Skip to comments.
Casey 54%, Santorun 34% (Rasmussen Reports) - Ouch!!!
Rasmussen Reports ^
| 11-10-05
| Rasmussen Reports
Posted on 11/10/2005 12:35:37 PM PST by TitansAFC
The latest Rasmussen Reports survey shows that Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum is continuing to lose ground in his battle for re-election. Santorum trails Democrat Bob Casey, Jr by twenty percentage points, 54% to 34%.
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; bobcasey; casey; caseyschumer; dadscoattails; demhackcasey; election; juniorcasey; santorum; schumercasey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 381-393 next last
To: edcoil
>>>But would not Casey vote FOR all of these as well?<<<
I did not vote for Casey. I voted for Santorum on the belief that he was conservative.
141
posted on
11/10/2005 1:26:21 PM PST
by
PhilipFreneau
("The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle.")
To: irons_player
I'm here in Ohio and I can tell you DeWine has no chance of losing, period. None.
142
posted on
11/10/2005 1:26:44 PM PST
by
LS
To: Diddle E. Squat
mostly his own stupid statements (such as during hurricane season trying to restrict public access to Nat'l Weather Service data.) That was a political payoff to AccuWeather in exchange for their bribes campaign contributions. It's a textbook example of the corrupt "crony capitalism" that has screwed up the post-Communist transitions of some of the old Soviet Empire states (most notably Russia itself).
143
posted on
11/10/2005 1:26:49 PM PST
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: Tarpon
I agree with you....he should be going about his biz, but sidetracked by being pummeled about.
Iraq,
Katrina,
Scooter and Rove,
Jordan bombings
weak election results...
tons of bad PR and even some conservatives are wondering why he is not fighting back
To: Dane
Heck no, but to be on the safe side I am going to stay out of traffic for a while.
145
posted on
11/10/2005 1:27:02 PM PST
by
asp1
To: LanaTurnerOverdrive
Hey, I am damn sick and tired watching Bush play the role of punching bag. Someone has to conduct an intervention and get Bush back on track.
There is no reason for the lack of leadership -- for instance, where is the President on drilling in the Arctic wasteland?
146
posted on
11/10/2005 1:27:02 PM PST
by
Tarpon
To: TitansAFC
I'm starting to think all the Rino Republicans just shot everyone in the foot and ALL the Republicans are in trouble in '06, even Conservatives. I hope I'm wrong but I am worried.
147
posted on
11/10/2005 1:27:10 PM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: Palladin
I'm trying to share your optimism, but after Tuesday, I'm not sure Rick can do it. Our only hope is that Casey opens his mouth early and often.
148
posted on
11/10/2005 1:27:24 PM PST
by
stevio
(Red-Blooded American Male (NRA))
To: Cindy_Cin
My husband and I call him the invisible president. Well gee, kinda of hard to be a positive President when you have a proven liberal biased MSM, reporting, and some people on FR sucking up the MSM "news" like mother's milk.
149
posted on
11/10/2005 1:27:27 PM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: RobbyS
How realistic is it was it for the junior senator not to know howe many people he alienated by NOT supporting Toomey? Of course he knew. I think he overestimated how many people would understand that he had no choice in the matter. You don't have success in politics while trying to unseat senior members of your own party.
People don't want to live in reality and want to punish Rick for doing what he had to do.
IAC, he needs to go full bore to win them back. His argument must be that Casey WILL vote down the line with a very liberal party, or be treated like a pariah as his father was.
Of course he needs to win them back. But they have to start seeing things more clearly. Put themselves in Rick's shoes and honestly look at his choices. If he had bucked Bush and Specter, and Specter still won, he would be a pariah in the Senate and in his party.
SD
To: asp1
I just bought two copies of Santorum's book on Amazon to give as gifts and I encourage all Freepers to do likewise.
Read it. And then tell me this isn't exactly the kind of man we want in the senate.
I think I'm going to post this on every "Santorum sucks" thread. The pro-death ghouls are definitely trying to abort Rick.
151
posted on
11/10/2005 1:28:18 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Hillary smiles whenever a Freeper trashes Santorum)
To: Antoninus
Aggg. Bad link. Let's try that again:
152
posted on
11/10/2005 1:29:34 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Hillary smiles whenever a Freeper trashes Santorum)
To: Shermy
was unaware people who take their religious faith seriously take home their miscarried fetuses to cuddle and show it to their other children Allowing your children to see their baby sibling before burial is a reasonable choice for a person to make.
Only an disgusting anti-religious liberal would scoff atband denigrate a family's decision in such a matter.
153
posted on
11/10/2005 1:30:19 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
("She was appointed by a conservative. That ought to have been enough for us." -- NotBrilliant)
To: My2Cents
Maybe the Dems will get a clue here....topple the GOP majority by nominating pro-life Democrats.
Put gun control on the back burner, hit hard at the immigration issue and we could be in a world of hurt come '06 & '08.
To: Antoninus
"...Listening to all you defeatist losers here on FR is really charging me up. Though I'm a Jerseyite, I think I'm going to work for Rick in 2006. I'd rather go down supporting a good man like Santorum--whom the gays and democrats publicly DESPISE--than supporting some RINO lackey."
Amen, brother. I live a long way from PA. What can we do to help?
To: SandyInSeattle
Don't they have to hold primaries first? Or is Santorum "the" candidate for the republicans? Yes and yes. There will be no opposition to his getting the nomination. If those whining here really wanted things to change, they would have a candidate in the primary. Instead, they want to punish Santorum and give the seat to the democrats.
SD
To: madprof98
I agree it seems when I have posted what I consider legitimate criticisms of the Bush leadership & the weak appease the Democrats GOP majority in DC, I usually get a lot of nasty responses.
Maybe the so called "right wing" is not welcome in the Republican Party I see today. The party of who?
John McCain?
To: Antoninus
LOL, I keep cking in to see if the thread evolves into anything constructive, like maybe, plans to defeat our leftwing enemy, and help a conservative.
I guess I'll come back later.
To: RayBob
All well and good, but Patty Toomey is NOT the nominee and won't be the nominee, so that's beating a dead horse. Man! Some people never get over their "dream" candidates and get in the real world.
I'd like to have better than DeWin in OH, but HE'S THE CANDIDATE.
159
posted on
11/10/2005 1:31:56 PM PST
by
LS
To: HOYA97; TitansAFC; All
"In a word? Philadelphia!"
In another two words: voter fraud (in Philadelphia).
[FYI: President Bush lost PA by a mere 144,248 votes; he lost Philadelphia by 412,106 votes -- remove Philadelphia from the equation and the President (Santorum) wins PA easily!!]
Lots of excellent 2004 PA election data at
http://www.uselectionatlas.org/USPRESIDENT/state.php?year=2004&fips=42&f=0
160
posted on
11/10/2005 1:32:04 PM PST
by
DrDeb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 381-393 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson