Posted on 11/09/2005 7:05:39 PM PST by SLB
"Civilization is hideously fragile," argued C. P. Snow. "There's not much between us and the horrors underneath, just about a coat of varnish."
Snow's statement takes on ominous overtones in light of the raging riots in and around Paris. Over the past nearly two weeks, demonstrations, rioting, car burnings, and various other acts of violence have spread throughout the suburban enclaves where the city's ethnic minorities--mostly immigrants from North Africa--are congregated. The violence is not limited to France. Similar violence has erupted in Brussels and other European cities. Clearly, something has gone horribly wrong.
Even as many in the Western media attempt to downplay the extent and nature of this violence, the smoke is spreading, and the debris is mounting. The world has watched as France has been thrown into a state of emergency, with riots, street fighting, and arson enveloping entire neighborhoods. The weak, slow, and confused response of the French government has only exacerbated the problem. Even as the government declared a state of emergency, French authorities still deny the extent of the disorder.
For years now, observers have warned that Europe has put itself in a position of tremendous vulnerability. Even as European birth rates have fallen below population replacement levels, immigrants, largely from Muslim lands, have been eagerly received and put to work. In one sense, many Western European nations built the economic expansions they experienced during the 1960s and 1970s on a base of immigrant labor.
Now, France and its neighboring countries are reaping what they have sown. The economic growth of the 1960s and 1970s has been replaced with economic stagnation and rampant unemployment. The young men now rioting in the streets of Paris represent the second generation of immigrants, and they face a bleak future with little hope of gaining jobs or a chance to obtain the European vision of happiness and prosperity.
Furthermore, they don't want to embrace that European worldview in the first place. To a far greater extent than their parents, these second-generation inhabitants of minority enclaves want to reassert their Islamic identity and force their agenda upon the nation.
France is now home to an estimated six million Muslims, most of African descent. This Muslim population, the largest in Europe, represents almost one tenth of the total population of France. "The government hasn't really realized we're facing a major political crisis," said Patrick Lozes, president of the Circle for the Promotion of Diversity in France told The Washington Post. "The French social model is exploding."
Indeed, as The Wall Street Journal noted, "France is the main testing ground of the continent's ability to bring this rapidly growing minority into the fold." It's not going well.
The Europeans have prided themselves on rejecting America's concept of the "melting pot." Instead of assimilating immigrants into the larger national culture, France (along with most other Western European nations) has encouraged immigrants to maintain their own identity, language, and culture and has created a "salad bowl" model that now contributes to this civil strife.
Without doubt, the protests are linked to economic realities. Young men who have little opportunity for jobs and economic power can easily opt-out of the entire cultural project--especially when they were never invited to join in the first place. Unemployment among French citizens in their twenties now stands at twenty percent, and the unemployment rate for members of the country's minority population of the same age is forty percent. This alone is a recipe for disaster.
Nevertheless, the economic explanation is woefully insufficient. The rioters, often identified in the press as "youths," are agents of violent rage and social anarchy. As observer Mark Steyn comments, the riot is now taking on the shape of "a rather shrewd and disciplined campaign."
The urban terrorists who are rioting in France have taken their cues from terrorists in the Middle East, where car burnings and similar demonstrations of violence have become a means of routine political protest.
Paul Belien, writing from Belgium, suggests that France is no longer able to defend itself against the forces of barbarism. "Unlike their fathers, who came to France from Muslim countries, accepting that, whilst remaining Muslims themselves, they had come to live in a non-Muslim country, the rioters see France as their country," he explains. "They were born here. This land is their land. And since they are Muslims, this land, or at least a part of it, is Muslim as well."
Furthermore, Belien argues that the rioters are not driven by anger, but by hatred. These young agents of disorder do not merely hate their limited economic prospects, but the very civilization that has harbored them. "It is hatred," Belien insists. "Hatred caused not by injustice suffered, but stemming from a sense of superiority. The 'youths' do not blame the French, they despise them."
Steyn suggests that the widespread outbreak of violence in Paris and beyond represents "the start of a long Eurabian civil war." Steyn, along with other concerned observers, understands that Europe is heading for a Muslim future. After all, the Muslims are having babies at a rate that far exceeds native Europeans. Furthermore, they are driven by a clear political agenda, deep Islamic conviction, and a clear and coherent concept of what they want the culture to be--an Islamic state.
The French, on the other hand, while possessed of an enormous sense of cultural superiority, no longer possess a clear or coherent concept of what it means to be French. They stress tolerance, but have embraced forces of radical intolerance.
As Thomas Sowell explains, "In the name of tolerance, these countries have imported intolerance, of which growing antisemitism in Europe is just one example. In the name of respecting all cultures, Western nations have welcomed people who respect neither the cultures nor the rights of the population among whom they have settled."
Steyn's concept of "Eurabia" also points to the links between the violence in France and the simmering hatreds of the Middle East. For the last several decades, France has attempted to appease its Muslim citizens by supporting Arab governments, criticizing Israel, and offering financial assistance to radical groups such as Hamas. Presumably, the frustrated Muslim youth of France were to be thankful for the French government's support of Muslim extremism in the Middle East. What possessed the French to think that the extremism would remain outside its own borders?
The unrest in France should serve to underline the deep cultural commitments that are fundamental to civilization. No society can withstand the threat of rampant anarchy from within. Civilization is always an achievement--a work and project embraced and supported by the vast majority of citizens, who enter into a social compact for the common good.
France has struggled with these ideals ever since the French Revolution. Unlike the American Revolution, which was established upon an inherited Christian worldview and the conservative streams of the Enlightenment, the French Revolution was radical, violent, anarchic, and highly secular.
Indeed, secularism has been an official French project for most of the last two centuries. Even as the French revolutionaries replaced the cross on the altar of the Cathedral of Notre Dame with a likeness of the goddess Reason, the French have prided themselves on the highly secular nature of their cultural experiment.
From one angle, this experiment appears to be a radical success. After all, only a small minority of French citizens consider themselves active Christians. Christianity plays almost no public role in the nation and its public culture. On the other hand, it is now apparent that this secularism, so eagerly embraced as a national project, has left a huge vacuum in the soul of French civilization. Even as nature abhors a vacuum, a secular vacuum will not long survive. The Muslim youths now rampaging through the streets of Paris want to fill that vacuum with Muslim rage.
Writer Theodore Dalrymple speaks of "barbarians at the gates of Paris." Those who honor civilization and understand, like C. P. Snow, that civilization is "hideously fragile," must look to France with concern and soberness. Will European civilization soon be a thing of the past?
Sometimes I have to wonder how far behind them we are.
The barbarians are burning Rome again.
Yep
France and "Rome" are hardly in the same category.
From the Religion of Peace?
What are the differences? (other than language)
While our elected Neros fiddle! This situation has been brought about by eager capitalists hungry for cheap labor, politicians raised on marxist utopian ideas, and complacent, happy populations voting the rascals into office. 12-20 million muzzies in Europe, up from 250,000 50 years ago? Have we been asleep?! Have we been totally ignorant of the history of this religion?
Looks like France is quickly becoming the next Israel.
A school is burning right now in Belfort and there is still a lot of violence around the country.
The media and wires have stopped covering it... You have to learn about it from French blogs.
"France and "Rome" are hardly in the same category."
No, the Roman Empire that extended throughout Europe was brought to its knees over time by barbarians from within its borders. The same can be said about France and Europe in general, though I'm not saying the Chirac's government is about to be toppled any time soon.
In 538 AD the Western Roman Empire went down for the last time. The Dark Ages began that spring, and lasted, more or less, for another millenium. The Eastern Roman Empire stayed in business.
We, Americans, can take a clue from the events in France, Germany and Belgium and maybe the whole of EU.
Read my lips: The 5 million dissidents referred to or whatever they are calling them tonight, are mostly the children and relatives of "guest-workers" who were working in these EU countries in the past.
Now if you think in 10 or 20 years the same thing can't happen to us but on a larger and grander scale where we, ourselves will be supporting people who have an axe to grind...
Have to read it more carefully, looks like a well written piece on first glance.
The French have been seeking to recover their glory in the Middle East ever since.
"Social scientists" have long blamed crime on low self esteem.
The reality is that criminals have entirely too damn much self esteem, and a sense of entitlement that allows them to justify crime as "taking what's theirs" and "sticking it to the man that's keeping me down"
Muslims are fed a steady diet of how superior they are to the infidel. Then the must reconcile their economic and social reality. The only way out for their egos, is to decide that they are being kept down by evil-doers. Hence the rage and violence. They are essentially psychotic, and there's only one solution for mad dogs
Makes you think, don't it? It should make the Frogs think hard.
In a sense, this is worst than an Al Qaeda attack. The latter is usually a single event of large proportions, which by its nature can't be repeated frequently without the perps getting caught. What's going on in France is a level higher in violence, pure anarchy that can't be contained and is infinitely repeatable. I'm not sure the French have a large enough military to pacify 300 cities.
France has had it's filthy hands in many wars that would not have been fought, were it not for French dreams of power.
Let France burn this time!
The EU concept might have worked, but for French involvement.
France is just a useless "shitty little country".
If humanity ever gets a chance to "vote" the worst troublemaker off the island, I have no doubt France would win!
France (Gaul - the land of the Franks) is where in 732AD invading Islamic armies suffered their greatest defeat by Charles Martel's Frankish army, pushing the defeated Muslims back over the Pyrenees mountains saving Europe from Islamic rule.
Today's Islamic enemy has been infiltrating Western nations for over 25 years waiting for the orders of jihad, one country after the other.
The leaders of anti-Western jihadism unlike the invading Muslim hordes throughout history, have vast oil profits and know how to use the Internet to spread hate and recruit new, expendable jihadists, more than willing to self detonate, as in Jordan, Iraq and Afghanistan & elsewhere.
France appeased Saddam and is now paying the price - whose next?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.