Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick Fitzgerald Ignored Witnesses Who Contradicted Wilson
NewsMax ^ | 11/9/05

Posted on 11/09/2005 9:07:53 AM PST by areafiftyone

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's Leakgate investigation is coming unraveled, as witness after witness steps forward to challenge a key premise of his controversial probe.

Was the identity of Joseph Wilson's wife Valerie Plame really a deep dark secret before she was "outed" by columnist Robert Novak in July 2003?

The number of witnesses now saying "No" has climbed to four - and none of them have apparently been interviewed by Fitzgerald's investigators.

On Wednesday, Wayne Simmons, a 27-year veteran at the CIA, told Fox News Radio: "As most people now know, [Plame] was traipsed all over Washington many years ago by Joe Wilson and introduced at embassies and other parties as 'my CIA wife.'

Last week, Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely told WABC Radio's John Batchelor that during a 2002 conversation with Wilson while the two waited to appear on a TV show, Wilson casually mentioned that his wife worked at "the Agency." In Oct. 2003, NBC's diplomatic correspondent, Andrea Mitchell, told CNBC that Plame's occupation "was widely known among those of us who cover the intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger."

Mitchell added: "So a number of us began to pick up on that."

And in Sept. 2003, NationalReviewOnline's Cliff May wrote that when Plame's CIA connection was mentioned in Novak's column - "That wasn't news to me."

"I had been told that [Plame was CIA] - but not by anyone working in the White House. Rather, I learned it from someone who formerly worked in the government and he mentioned it in an offhand manner, leading me to infer it was something that insiders were well aware of."

The day his report appeared, May told the Fox News Channel's John Gibson: "I knew this, and a lot of other people knew it."

In fact, rumors now swirl around Washington that Plame used to take her friends to lunch at the CIA's cafeteria.

So what has Mr.Fitzgerald - who was hailed as a "prosecutor's prosecutor" only weeks ago - done with the avalanche of testimony that contradicts his stated claim that Plame's job "was not widely known"?

Apparently nothing.

In the six days since he's gone public, Gen. Vallely says prosecutors have yet to contact him.

Ms. Mitchell has been mum since her "widely known" comment resurfaced last week, offering no indication whether Fitzgerald has bothered to check her story out.

If Mr. May has been interrogated, he's also keeping it to himself.

And Mr. Simmons has made no mention of any contact with Fitzgerald's team.

On the other hand, the prosecutor's prosecutor made a big show of interviewing two of the Wilsons neighbors just four days before he announced his indictment of Lewis Libby - in a bid to establish whether Ms. Plame's occupation was indeed secret.

It was, as far as her neighbors were concerned. But the revelation that Fitzgerald had waited till the last minute to confirm such a key aspect of his case raised more than a few eyebrows.

Now, with four witnesses on the record saying they knew what the Wilsons' neighbors didn't - and two of those witnesses coming forward even before the Leakgate investigation began - it's beginning to look like Mr. Fitzgerald deliberately ignored critical testimony that would have compelled him to close up shop well before he ever got to Mr. Libby.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2005 9:07:53 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

-b-


2 posted on 11/09/2005 9:08:59 AM PST by rellimpank (urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

surprise surprise surprise.

Fitz wanted to be finished for the 2004 election. schmuck.


3 posted on 11/09/2005 9:09:12 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Fitzmas is quickly turning into the exit polls on election day 2004 for the LIBS...
4 posted on 11/09/2005 9:11:54 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fooman; All

These people if they are not interviewed by Fitzgerald they need to go on the MSM Television.


5 posted on 11/09/2005 9:11:57 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I picture a lot of moth holes in the fabric of Fitzgerald's story.


6 posted on 11/09/2005 9:12:03 AM PST by syriacus (The cold-heartedness of libs, toward the Iraqis's attempts for a better life, takes my breath away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
As interesting as this stuff is, do I have to remind everyone that Fitzgerald didn't indict anyone for leaking classified information? So none of this contradicts the actual charges he made.

It does, of course, contradict the story he wove around the charges, including the claim that Valerie Plame's employment status was classified.

7 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:00 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

It's time for Bush to do a bunch of payback on the Democrats who keep leaking our secrets to our foreign enemies.

Many Democrats in leadership positions are know traitors to their own country.


8 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:07 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

This whole thing is a joke. You want scandal? Let's talk about dead cabinet members, raped and molested interns, stolen FBI files, corrupt land deals, pardoning cocaine traffickers, (takes a breath), and on and on. If Clinton had an (R) after his name, he would have been impeached and convicted by year two.


9 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:15 AM PST by Flightdeck (Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Well imagine this. I wonder if the prosecutor is going to be reprimanded for this?


10 posted on 11/09/2005 9:14:47 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
These people if they are not interviewed by Fitzgerald they need to go on the MSM Television.

Even if they have been interviewed by Fitzpatrick (or testified before the GJ), there is no law stopping them from talking about it on TV.

11 posted on 11/09/2005 9:15:06 AM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Right!


12 posted on 11/09/2005 9:15:22 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

How does one get "un" indited I wonder? Libby could still get 30 years in jail for something he didn't do.


13 posted on 11/09/2005 9:16:20 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

darn, seems I was about the only person to not know Ms. Plame was CIA...


14 posted on 11/09/2005 9:16:55 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Ms. Mitchell has been mum since her "widely known" comment resurfaced last week, offering no indication whether Fitzgerald has bothered to check her story out.

Note that Ms. Mitchell's boss is Mr. Russert. Did Russert know, too? If not, why not? Is he that disconnected from the people who work under him? Or did he just "forget"?

15 posted on 11/09/2005 9:17:33 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

I guess Fitzy is bucking for AG in 2008.

Fitzy Earle might more likely be bucking for a disbarment.


16 posted on 11/09/2005 9:18:27 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Someone please help me understand more clearly....

My understanding is that, in effect, Libby is now facing a trial for having supposedly lied under oath to cover-up something that is obviously not a crime (as in a violation of the statute of "outing" undercover CIA agents)...?

So what am I missing in this puzzle..?
17 posted on 11/09/2005 9:18:47 AM PST by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Hmmmm.


18 posted on 11/09/2005 9:19:46 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I'm beginning to think Libby won't have much of a problem beating what looks more and more like a purely political prosecution.

The prosecutor's prosecutor took millions from the taxpayers over two years to fund his large operation, he had to charge somebody. Plus he will be bilking the public for anoither year or two.


19 posted on 11/09/2005 9:20:29 AM PST by citizen (History shows Muslims are Jihadists....The real radical Muslims are the live-and-let-live moderates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
As interesting as this stuff is, do I have to remind everyone that Fitzgerald didn't indict anyone for leaking classified information? So none of this contradicts the actual charges he made.

This bears repeating. Fitzy doesn't have to talk to these people, because he isn't charging anyone with leaking her name. Just the "cover up" about it.

Newsmax is a lousy news service. A Joke.

20 posted on 11/09/2005 9:21:35 AM PST by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson