Skip to comments.
Patrick Fitzgerald Ignored Witnesses Who Contradicted Wilson
NewsMax ^
| 11/9/05
Posted on 11/09/2005 9:07:53 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: areafiftyone
2
posted on
11/09/2005 9:08:59 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(urbanites don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm:NRABenefactor)
To: areafiftyone
surprise surprise surprise.
Fitz wanted to be finished for the 2004 election. schmuck.
3
posted on
11/09/2005 9:09:12 AM PST
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: areafiftyone
Fitzmas is quickly turning into the exit polls on election day 2004 for the LIBS...
4
posted on
11/09/2005 9:11:54 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
To: fooman; All
These people if they are not interviewed by Fitzgerald they need to go on the MSM Television.
5
posted on
11/09/2005 9:11:57 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: areafiftyone
I picture a lot of moth holes in the fabric of Fitzgerald's story.
6
posted on
11/09/2005 9:12:03 AM PST
by
syriacus
(The cold-heartedness of libs, toward the Iraqis's attempts for a better life, takes my breath away.)
To: areafiftyone
As interesting as this stuff is, do I have to remind everyone that Fitzgerald
didn't indict anyone for leaking classified information? So none of this contradicts the actual charges he made.
It does, of course, contradict the story he wove around the charges, including the claim that Valerie Plame's employment status was classified.
7
posted on
11/09/2005 9:13:00 AM PST
by
mcg1969
To: areafiftyone
It's time for Bush to do a bunch of payback on the Democrats who keep leaking our secrets to our foreign enemies.
Many Democrats in leadership positions are know traitors to their own country.
8
posted on
11/09/2005 9:13:07 AM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: areafiftyone
This whole thing is a joke. You want scandal? Let's talk about dead cabinet members, raped and molested interns, stolen FBI files, corrupt land deals, pardoning cocaine traffickers, (takes a breath), and on and on. If Clinton had an (R) after his name, he would have been impeached and convicted by year two.
9
posted on
11/09/2005 9:13:15 AM PST
by
Flightdeck
(Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
To: areafiftyone
Well imagine this. I wonder if the prosecutor is going to be reprimanded for this?
To: areafiftyone
These people if they are not interviewed by Fitzgerald they need to go on the MSM Television.Even if they have been interviewed by Fitzpatrick (or testified before the GJ), there is no law stopping them from talking about it on TV.
11
posted on
11/09/2005 9:15:06 AM PST
by
Maceman
(Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
To: frogjerk
12
posted on
11/09/2005 9:15:22 AM PST
by
cvq3842
To: syriacus
How does one get "un" indited I wonder? Libby could still get 30 years in jail for something he didn't do.
To: areafiftyone
darn, seems I was about the only person to not know Ms. Plame was CIA...
14
posted on
11/09/2005 9:16:55 AM PST
by
VOA
To: areafiftyone
Ms. Mitchell has been mum since her "widely known" comment resurfaced last week, offering no indication whether Fitzgerald has bothered to check her story out. Note that Ms. Mitchell's boss is Mr. Russert. Did Russert know, too? If not, why not? Is he that disconnected from the people who work under him? Or did he just "forget"?
15
posted on
11/09/2005 9:17:33 AM PST
by
Pete
To: Flightdeck
I guess Fitzy is bucking for AG in 2008.
Fitzy Earle might more likely be bucking for a disbarment.
16
posted on
11/09/2005 9:18:27 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
To: areafiftyone
Someone please help me understand more clearly....
My understanding is that, in effect, Libby is now facing a trial for having supposedly lied under oath to cover-up something that is obviously not a crime (as in a violation of the statute of "outing" undercover CIA agents)...?
So what am I missing in this puzzle..?
17
posted on
11/09/2005 9:18:47 AM PST
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: areafiftyone
18
posted on
11/09/2005 9:19:46 AM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: areafiftyone
I'm beginning to think Libby won't have much of a problem beating what looks more and more like a purely political prosecution.
The prosecutor's prosecutor took millions from the taxpayers over two years to fund his large operation, he had to charge somebody. Plus he will be bilking the public for anoither year or two.
19
posted on
11/09/2005 9:20:29 AM PST
by
citizen
(History shows Muslims are Jihadists....The real radical Muslims are the live-and-let-live moderates.)
To: mcg1969
As interesting as this stuff is, do I have to remind everyone that Fitzgerald didn't indict anyone for leaking classified information? So none of this contradicts the actual charges he made. This bears repeating. Fitzy doesn't have to talk to these people, because he isn't charging anyone with leaking her name. Just the "cover up" about it.
Newsmax is a lousy news service. A Joke.
20
posted on
11/09/2005 9:21:35 AM PST
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson