Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain vows torture ban in (all) Senate bills
The Blade ^ | Nov. 5, 2005

Posted on 11/05/2005 1:26:35 PM PST by jmc1969

WASHINGTON - Girding for a potential fight with the Bush administration, supporters of a ban on torturing prisoners of war by U.S. interrogators threatened Friday to include the prohibition in nearly every bill the Senate considers until it becomes law.

The no-torture wording, which proponents say is supported by majorities in both houses of Congress, was included last month in the Senate's version of a defense spending bill. The measure's final form is being negotiated with the House, and the White House is pushing for either a rewording or deletion of the torture ban.

On Friday, at the urging of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, the Senate by a voice vote added the ban to a related defense bill as a backup.

Speaking from the Senate floor, McCain said, "If necessary - and I sincerely hope it is not - I and the co-sponsors of this amendment will seek to add it to every piece of important legislation voted on in the Senate until the will of a substantial bipartisan majority in both houses of Congress prevails. Let no one doubt our determination."

(Excerpt) Read more at toledoblade.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 109th; cia; mccain; torturebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: jmc1969

"Let no one doubt our determination."

It's not your determination that's in doubt, John.


21 posted on 11/05/2005 1:44:48 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
(A FEW YEARS BACK. IN AN OPERATING ROOM)

Doctor 1: Uh oh, we are going to have to take a good chunk of his temple out.

Doctor 2: This guy is a Senator. I hope he retires because this may mess his head up.

McCain (regaining consciousness): I would have had them if not....

Doctor 1 (snapping fingers): Senator McCain! Hello. Can you see me?

McCain: For the strawberries! I would have had them but for the strawberries.

Doctor 2 (screaming): Eiiiiii!!!!!!!!!

Doctor 1: Gads! He's grabbed your crotched and is playing with your privates! He' trying to roll them around in his hand!

McCain: They laughed at me and made jokes, but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt, and with, with geometric logic, that, that a duplicate key to the Senate wardroom icebox did exist......

Doctor 1: Run!!!!!

22 posted on 11/05/2005 1:47:09 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Eternity? Smoking or nonsmoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"Bipartisan" (under McCain's Law of Senate Privilege) means 1 repubbie (HIM) and 45 democrats + 1 socialist.
23 posted on 11/05/2005 1:47:33 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Do you mean Hilary Bottom Clinton?


24 posted on 11/05/2005 1:47:52 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
Not a McCain fan, but he's right on this one. Torture is against Geneva conventions. Close the "enemy combatant" loophole. We are America, and we are above treating POWs like that.

Never thought I'd agree with McCain on anything, especially after his anti-tobacco boondoggle in the late 90s that led to a regressive "settlement" tax on lower income smokers. But when you are right, you're right, and any form of torture should not have the American stamp on it.

I know I disagree with most of you on this, and I do so respectfully.
25 posted on 11/05/2005 1:49:02 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

If the bill doesn't closely define what is considered torture, then I'm against it. We don't need another statute with vague phrases in it that any lawyer can play with. I'm opposed to most forms of torture, but this is ridiculous.


26 posted on 11/05/2005 1:49:52 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

"Taxation and loss of personal freedom then apparently isn't a concern for Senator MCain."

Ditto. Also add that terrorism is not a concern of his.


27 posted on 11/05/2005 1:51:02 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: DTogo
Johnny "Jackass" "Manchurian Candidate" McCain needs to shut his mouth. What's he doing, trying for another "spot" in the Democrats' Presidential campaign ads for '08? Sounds like it to me. I was OUTRAGED when NewsMax ran an umpteen page story entitled "Inside McCain's Head" (paraphrased). If there IS a thought there, it must be rattling around, all by itself------in the dark!
29 posted on 11/05/2005 1:52:12 PM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anselma

The result of a bill like this will be to put a president or anyone in the chain of command in jeopardy if 'torture' is ever discovered. The Democrats will have a great time with this one. It will work better for them than the Plame affair.


30 posted on 11/05/2005 1:52:32 PM PST by carola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Watch McCain go overboard on this issue. He is receiving little or no support for his presidential run. They blame it on his age but he bears grudges and can't handle his wish for some sort of cheap revenge.


31 posted on 11/05/2005 1:52:37 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

"When will people really wakeup and smell the threat of terrorism?"

Well, there's a list floating around FR somewhere that shows every terrorist attack from the 70's forward.

Even 9/11 didn't shake us from our slumber and apathy.

I'm thinking it'll take an attack on our Capitol in DC, or The White House...one of which was just thwarted yesterday by British intelligence, so looks like we can just continue to ignore this problem for now. /sarcasm


32 posted on 11/05/2005 1:54:22 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: river rat

'SOMETHING must explain McCain's and Kerry's despicable behavior during the hearings on Vietnam's POW/MIA Senate "Hearing"...'

Yah. Manchurian Candidates.


33 posted on 11/05/2005 1:55:11 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
McCain's the flower of the Senate....






He's a blooming idiot!

34 posted on 11/05/2005 1:59:49 PM PST by GloriaJane (http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
The Geneva Convention only applies to legitimate soldiers of national armies, not to the enemies we're fighting at this time.

They should be tortured at all times until they're put up against a wall and shot. The fact that we don't do that is a matter of concern.

35 posted on 11/05/2005 2:00:46 PM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

McCain's brain is in la la land. I understand how he suffered - and why he cannot forget it. But, he must understand that torture can be a real effective tool in war and other situations. His brain has turned to mush.
Tell you what, if I thought I could save 100 people by making somebody hurt a bit in order to find out how to help, I would do it in a minute.


36 posted on 11/05/2005 2:02:09 PM PST by Virginia Queen (Virginia Queen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

Have you read the law? It's language is so vague as to be interpreted by the likes of the 9th Circuit to free any prisoner in any war because merely being captured can be humiliating or degrading. It's not just a bad idea, it's bad law.


37 posted on 11/05/2005 2:02:22 PM PST by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: carola

"The result of a bill like this will be to put a president or anyone in the chain of command in jeopardy if 'torture' is ever discovered. The Democrats will have a great time with this one. It will work better for them than the Plame affair."

Exactly so. And just whose side is McCain on? Why, his own, of course. And to H##L with the rest of us.



38 posted on 11/05/2005 2:02:28 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Interesting that McCain identifies with the terrorists.


39 posted on 11/05/2005 2:04:53 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

McCain is a nitwit, but- a nitwit with a "conscience." Not a good combination.


40 posted on 11/05/2005 2:06:37 PM PST by Anselma (MSM: leaders in Whirled News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson