Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schweitzer discusses coal conversion
Billings Gazette ^ | Nov 3, 2005

Posted on 11/03/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Brian328i

TULSA, Okla. -- Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer visited a demonstration plant that converts natural gas into synthetic diesel fuel and said the process could help wean the country off foreign oil.

This technology could also be used to make diesel fuel from coal, which is in abundance in Montana.

"The country has two options for energy until we build a bridge to a hydrogen economy," Schweitzer said in a visit Wednesday to the Syntroleum Corp. plant. "We can either continue to give money to dictators who want to destroy our way of life, or we can provide tens of thousands of jobs in America's heartland."

Montana contains about 120 billion tons of easily recoverable coal, Schweitzer said.

Syntroleum President and Chief Executive Officer Jack Holmes said his company's process could diversify the country's fuel sources.

"The biggest cost of getting coal is physically transporting it," Holmes said. "Governor Schweitzer realizes we can build our plants at the mine mouths and provide good jobs for Montana citizens. We can make the finished product right there and supply the local demand. It's a win-win for everybody."

Schweitzer and Holmes said the synthetic diesel is affordable at current prices, costing about $35 to $40 a barrel, well below Wednesday's New York Mercantile Exchange price of $59.70 for a barrel of crude oil, but significantly higher than the product has netted for much of the past 20 years.

Over the past two years, the company has moved its processes from research and development to implementation. Syntroleum operates a 70 barrel-per-day demonstration plant, but no commercially viable plants are operational.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Montana; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: alternativeenergy; coaltodiesel; energy; schweitzer; syntroleum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Didn't see this in a search so here it is. He's a Democrat, but at least he's actively pursuing energy options so I give him credit for that.
1 posted on 11/03/2005 6:32:42 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper


2 posted on 11/03/2005 6:36:10 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i

Pardon me, but what advantage is there in consuming more natural gas, which is supposedly in short supply this winter, and converting it to diesel?


3 posted on 11/03/2005 6:38:35 PM PST by Obadiah ( Deuteronomy 6:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Alot of natural gas is already burned off as it is. Schweitzer has been lobbying for the coal to diesel method instead of NG.


4 posted on 11/03/2005 6:40:48 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Its coal to diesel, I believe. Gas to diesel would be crazy.


5 posted on 11/03/2005 6:41:45 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i
"The country has two options for energy until we build a bridge to a hydrogen economy," Schweitzer said in a visit Wednesday to the Syntroleum Corp. plant. "We can either continue to give money to dictators who want to destroy our way of life, or we can provide tens of thousands of jobs in America's heartland."

I could not have said it better myself. Drilling in ANWR, coal, ethanol, bio diesel, whatever it takes.

6 posted on 11/03/2005 6:42:15 PM PST by kerryusama04 (The UN wants our guns so they can rape our children and steal our money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; All

crazy you say

A Middle Eastern country in the heart of the world’s largest oil-producing region is embarking on what may be one of the largest alternative fuel experiments in history.

The Wall Street Journal reported Feb. 15 that Qatar – a tiny nation on a peninsula between Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf – is building a massive plant to turn the country’s natural gas into diesel fuel.

The process Qatar plans to use is not new. It is the same process used by South Africa and World War II-era Germany to turn coal into diesel. During the Apartheid era, many oil-producing countries would not do business with South Africa, and it depended on gasified coal for much of its diesel fuel needs.

John Rich Jr., president of Pennsylvania company WMPI, recently described the process to Land Line: Carbon-based substances are passed through an entrained flow gasifier to produce a synthesis gas. That synthesis gas then goes through a second process that liquefies it. The final product is a highly refined diesel that will run in existing diesel engines.

While Rich’s company uses the process to create diesel from coal waste, the Qatar plant would use it to convert natural gas into a liquid diesel fuel. Like’s Rich’s facilities, the Qatar process – called gas-to-liquid, or GTL – will produce a diesel that is free of many of the pollutants normally found in diesel fuel.

The Qatar project has caught the attention of some of the world’s oil giants, including ChevronTexaco, Royal Dutch/Shell Group and Exxon Mobil. The Journal reported that Exxon Mobil expects to spend between $15 billion and $17 billion to build facilities in the industrial park where Qatar plans to liquefy natural gas. A large part of that – $7 billion – will go to a gas-to-liquid plant, which The Journal said was the largest single investment in the history of the company.

Qatar has 14 percent of the world’s natural gas reserves.


7 posted on 11/03/2005 6:43:46 PM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

The process was developed by the Germans in WWII. It is expensive to do, but if you can produce diesel for $40 per 55 gallon barrel, then what are we waiting for?


8 posted on 11/03/2005 6:45:41 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i
Would like to see SYNM (Syntroleum Corp) get going with some viable projects. I think it has potential and I have made a few bucks on trading its stock in the past...but the drilling of an unusable well in its offshore Nigerian project has caused the stock to fall over 50% in recent days from the $15 area to the $7 area.

Right now, I have not figured out if I should be buying or watching....so I am still watching.
9 posted on 11/03/2005 6:52:26 PM PST by Guilliamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
but if you can produce diesel for $40 per 55 gallon barrel, then what are we waiting for?

A "barrel" of petroleum is only 42 gallons.
(Barrels (US) to Gallons (US) conversion calculator)

10 posted on 11/03/2005 7:00:13 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
You got to understand what kind of projects Syntroleum is doing...

It is drilling wells in a low BTU gas area in Kansas that no one wanted to drill because is was low BTU....its process makes these wells viable.

Its process is great for stranded gas wells...where there is no pipeline to take the gas to market.

Its Nigerian project is trying to put its process on a huge barge fifty miles off shore to convert gas to liquid that can then be shipped to market.
11 posted on 11/03/2005 7:00:38 PM PST by Guilliamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i

He's been pushing this position for several months, which I agree is good.

I don't think we need any federal bucks going into it, though. Record oil industry profits mean they have plenty of cash to take advantage of the research that's already been done. If his figures are right, they'd be making big bucks off the investment in a couple of years. They don't need our help to do that.


12 posted on 11/03/2005 7:00:40 PM PST by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i

We need fewer people sucking away at our scarce resources. Enforcing the deportation laws would help, if anyone is interested.


13 posted on 11/03/2005 7:07:35 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian328i
...at least he's actively pursuing energy options so I give him credit for that.

I've also read where Schweitzer and North Dakota Governor John Hoeven (Republican), have been actively using their Governorships to work together to find alternative energy solutions. Hoeven has been pushing ethanol-based fuel for automobiles, and North Dakota has plans to build 2 ethanol fuel generating plants in the state.

14 posted on 11/03/2005 7:07:38 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Still a buck a gallon...very expensive when the tech was invented (by the nazi war machine)...but VERY cheap for today...

Not doing this borders on criminality or at the very least colusion with those who would strangle our economy...a buck a gallon diesle can move a lot of products and services cheaper and lighten the burden on OUR wallets a bit too......

Let the bottom fall out from under Oil and let the arabs eat sand...

Plus building those plants would be good paying *Union* jobs...

(just had to throw the last in as a construction Electrician...*Grin*)


15 posted on 11/03/2005 7:09:56 PM PST by Crim (I may be a Mr "know it all"....but I'm also a Mr "forgot most of it"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
A "barrel" of petroleum is only 42 gallons.

True, but how many gallons of diesel do you get from a barrel of crude oil?

16 posted on 11/03/2005 7:11:36 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

"...record oil profits mean they have plenty of cash..."

Yes, I hope they know that they're really in the fuel business, not the oil busieness.

Otherwise they will make the same mistake the railroads did when they ignored the fact that they were in the transportation business and let the airlines be developed by someone else.


17 posted on 11/03/2005 7:12:27 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

ethanol SUCKS for most cars allready on the road........I wouldnt burn it in any vehicle not specificly designed for it...

Like my 73' Pontiac lemans.


18 posted on 11/03/2005 7:12:48 PM PST by Crim (I may be a Mr "know it all"....but I'm also a Mr "forgot most of it"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Crim
Like my 73' Pontiac lemans.

Of course. Ethanol is compatible with cars, pickup trucks, RV's, and motorcycles made within the last 15 years.

19 posted on 11/03/2005 7:17:55 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Heh..and those same vehicles wont run after an EMF pulse...

Not that I'm that paranoid...but it is nice knowing I can "get out of dodge" before the fallout hits....Heh heh


20 posted on 11/03/2005 7:22:09 PM PST by Crim (I may be a Mr "know it all"....but I'm also a Mr "forgot most of it"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson