Skip to comments.
Paper Calls Clarence Thomas 'Black Man With An Asterisk' (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
NewsMax.com ^
| Nov. 1, 2005
| Staff
Posted on 11/02/2005 7:16:38 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
An editorial in the Tuesday edition of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinal ssems to call into question the content and character behind the color of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' skin.
The newspaper - openly liberal by value of this opinion piece - is chock full of buzzwords straight out of the Democrat Party talking-points used to dsecribe the nomination of Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Saying the Alito nomination "lessens the nation's rich diversity," the editors argue that Alito's mere presence as a man should disqualify him from the opportunity to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the High Court.
Apparently, the Journal-Sentinel editors view the "O'Connor seat" as a female entitlement.
Most troubling, however, is the degrading, racil slap the editors make at Thomas:
"In losing a woman, the court with Alito would feature seven white men, one white woman, and a black man, who deserves an asterisk because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America."
Will the Journal-Sentinel editors be given a free pass by their media colleagues for using such derogatory and disrepectful language - not only to Thomas, but to all blacks and all Americans?
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: alito; demracism; leftistdeciet; leftistlies; liberalmedia; liberalracism; milwaukee; newspapers; racism; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: All
I bet that if this were a newspaper with even a slight conservative slant that the media would be all over it.
2
posted on
11/02/2005 7:18:06 PM PST
by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Petronski; cyborg; Howlin; mhking; rdb3
3
posted on
11/02/2005 7:20:19 PM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America.
I don't think Thomas does represent the views of mainstream black America.....which is a good thing....he represents high class black America......
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
6
posted on
11/02/2005 7:22:50 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Thomas should tell them to kiss his asterisk.
7
posted on
11/02/2005 7:23:12 PM PST
by
sourcery
(Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
This is the first time that I have every heard of anyone being excluded from an ethnic group because of what they think. I'm not black, but I would be deeply insulted by some lily white editor telling me what "your people" are supposed to think. Is there any other ethnic group that is required to think in a certain way? Why doesn't the black community rise up in anger against such suggestions?
To: There You Go Again
You've got to understand, if African-americans figure out that the Republican party isn't a party of "RACISTS" but actually empowers them to succeed, the Democrats are finished. They need to keep the myth alive to sustain their power.
9
posted on
11/02/2005 7:23:50 PM PST
by
ChrisFelice1
(Chrisfelice1)
To: There You Go Again
"because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America."
I don't think he represents the views of any color, he represents good in the human race.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The real insult in this is that for Justice Thomas to be considered a real black man he has to believe in:
Affirmative Action (racial discrimination)
Abortion (something that has decimated the black community)
Gun Control (something used to keep blacks defenseless in the Klan era)
The need for government to be responsible for people's lives
To behave like a house Negro for all the white folk who made him what he is.......
Yuck
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The Milwaukee Urinal ranks right up there with the best Communist rags in America.
12
posted on
11/02/2005 7:25:26 PM PST
by
Whitewasher
(Would u like America to be a goat nation in the millennium to come? Keep pushing the "Roadmap" bull!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Thats all right. The ACLU and the NAACP will be along to protect his rights any minute now.
*crickets chirping*
14
posted on
11/02/2005 7:27:45 PM PST
by
libs_kma
(USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Liberals think that "real blacks" are only those who live down to their expectations.
16
posted on
11/02/2005 7:32:01 PM PST
by
MikeHu
To: There You Go Again
I disagree. I think he represents AMERICA, one and all of us.
17
posted on
11/02/2005 7:32:07 PM PST
by
asp1
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America."
Good.
He is not supposed to.
He is supposed to represent the Constitution of the United States. They really do think the court is there to impose a liberal version of law on society. One that Thomas should have only because he is black. Do they want Scallia to represent his heritage? Would they have wanted Renquist to represent his background? One sided liberal bigots.
18
posted on
11/02/2005 7:38:50 PM PST
by
calljack
(Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
To: King Prout
I can hardly believe that some of the things I am hearing and seeing are being said by citizens of the United States and/or their mouthpieces.
19
posted on
11/02/2005 7:40:51 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It appears that the liberal media are the politically correct KKK these days.
20
posted on
11/02/2005 7:42:37 PM PST
by
DocRock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson