Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: All
I bet that if this were a newspaper with even a slight conservative slant that the media would be all over it.
2 posted on
11/02/2005 7:18:06 PM PST by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: Petronski; cyborg; Howlin; mhking; rdb3
3 posted on
11/02/2005 7:20:19 PM PST by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America.
I don't think Thomas does represent the views of mainstream black America.....which is a good thing....he represents high class black America......
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
6 posted on
11/02/2005 7:22:50 PM PST by
RockinRight
(It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Thomas should tell them to kiss his asterisk.
7 posted on
11/02/2005 7:23:12 PM PST by
sourcery
(Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The Milwaukee Urinal ranks right up there with the best Communist rags in America.
12 posted on
11/02/2005 7:25:26 PM PST by
Whitewasher
(Would u like America to be a goat nation in the millennium to come? Keep pushing the "Roadmap" bull!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Thats all right. The ACLU and the NAACP will be along to protect his rights any minute now.
*crickets chirping*
14 posted on
11/02/2005 7:27:45 PM PST by
libs_kma
(USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Liberals think that "real blacks" are only those who live down to their expectations.
16 posted on
11/02/2005 7:32:01 PM PST by
MikeHu
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America."
Good.
He is not supposed to.
He is supposed to represent the Constitution of the United States. They really do think the court is there to impose a liberal version of law on society. One that Thomas should have only because he is black. Do they want Scallia to represent his heritage? Would they have wanted Renquist to represent his background? One sided liberal bigots.
18 posted on
11/02/2005 7:38:50 PM PST by
calljack
(Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It appears that the liberal media are the politically correct KKK these days.
20 posted on
11/02/2005 7:42:37 PM PST by
DocRock
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
21 posted on
11/02/2005 7:44:34 PM PST by
UB355
(Slower traffic keep right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
So by virtue of one's "blackness," independent thinking is forbidden?
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It appears Newsmax doesn't have a spell checker any more.
24 posted on
11/02/2005 7:48:40 PM PST by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"lessens the nation's rich diversity,"
Any policy, law, regulation, or political appointment made that runs counter to maintaining the culture and value system that made this country great is the moral equivalent of national suicide. That includes judicial appointments having the primary purpose of representing our country's diversity. It is absurd to award, recognize and/ or perpetuate any cultural characteristic or philosophy that is clearly inferior to those ideals and values that created the magnet that draws these people to our country.
26 posted on
11/02/2005 7:59:06 PM PST by
RatRipper
(just call me an American nationalist with a closed mind)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"In losing a woman, the court with Alito would feature seven white men, one white woman, and a black man, who deserves an asterisk because he arguably does not represent the views of mainstream black America."By their own logic then, all the white dudes on the Supreme Court SHOULD represent the views of mainstream white America.
Right?
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I guess that makes the Journal-Sentinel a newspaper*
*Does not represent facts.
28 posted on
11/02/2005 8:16:18 PM PST by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I am proud to state I dropped my subscription many years ago.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
So, if President Bush nominated a white conservative female would they label her a White Woman with an * ???
32 posted on
11/02/2005 8:33:09 PM PST by
Enterprise
(The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson