Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: freedomdefender
And whether the GOP will use the Democrat filibuster on national center stage to publicly destroy that party once and for all.
2 posted on
10/31/2005 10:19:51 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Ninety-nine Republican Arlen Specters aren’t worth one Democratic Zell Miller)
To: freedomdefender
They (Scalia and Alito) will have to make a race to the right, but I think it will be by a nose, if at all. …
Wow, to hear this is a real pick-me-up on a Monday morning!
To: freedomdefender
So he is a strict constructionist in every since of the word? I know President Bush is looking for a conservative jurist, so he fits the bill in terms of someone who will interpret the Constitution literally Thank you, Katie.
4 posted on
10/31/2005 10:20:59 AM PST by
dangus
To: freedomdefender
KATIE COURIC: So he is a strict constructionist in every since of the word? I know President Bush is looking for a conservative jurist, so he fits the bill in terms of someone who will interpret the Constitution literally and may disagree with the right to privacy, which is the foundation of Roe v. Wade?So, Katie admits that the right to privacy isn't in the Constitution. Well, that's progress of a sort, I guess.
To: freedomdefender
The question is whether they can weather this storm that will be coming, I think, and whether there will be a filibuster.
Hey lefties, oddballs and other assorted liberal nut-job's?
Don't sing it, BRING IT.
6 posted on
10/31/2005 10:21:56 AM PST by
trubluolyguy
(Is it more stupid believe in God, or to be offended by that which you don't believe exists?)
To: freedomdefender
7 posted on
10/31/2005 10:21:56 AM PST by
governsleastgovernsbest
(read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
To: freedomdefender
Senator Frist is already exploring ways on how to surrender to the democrats on this appointment.
8 posted on
10/31/2005 10:23:02 AM PST by
cynicom
To: freedomdefender
Significantly, the left is relying less and less on the threat of the loss of "abortion rights" to scare people - it's the "right to privacy" supposedly at stake.
9 posted on
10/31/2005 10:23:11 AM PST by
Heatseeker
("I sort of like liberals now. They’re kind of cute when they’re shivering and afraid." - Ann Coulter)
To: freedomdefender
Sounds good. The same conservatives who opposed Miers had better get ready to fight like hell for Alito.
To: freedomdefender
No one is more conservative than my favorite Justice, Clarence Thomas.
11 posted on
10/31/2005 10:23:55 AM PST by
NeoCaveman
(Confirm Judge Alito now)
To: freedomdefender
We need Alito, and two more like him.
To: freedomdefender
the top choice for particularly pro-life people. . . . likely narrowing Roe and possibly voting to overturn Roe. . . . a strict constructionist. . . . a conservative jurist . . . someone who will interpret the Constitution literally. . . . Last week Chicago wins the World Series, now this.
Life is good.
To: freedomdefender
Sam Alito. Looks pretty good from here
17 posted on
10/31/2005 10:25:58 AM PST by
Old Seadog
(Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
To: freedomdefender
Good choice. We need to assume a filibuster. The real question is are there 51 votes (including Cheney) to invoke the constitutional option? I'm betting yes.
To: freedomdefender
Works for me.........my kinda guy.
21 posted on
10/31/2005 10:27:49 AM PST by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: freedomdefender
Turley and al-Khouriq?
Ideology over substance.
25 posted on
10/31/2005 10:28:47 AM PST by
Petronski
(Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
To: freedomdefender
They got their Ruth, we got our Sam.
26 posted on
10/31/2005 10:29:04 AM PST by
Pylot
To: freedomdefender
COURIC: So it could be said that Mr Alito wont make up law from the bench? Hmm... It should be stated that Mr Alito wont be uniting the country then...(aka. Not a flaming liberal judge)"
30 posted on
10/31/2005 10:31:02 AM PST by
smith288
(Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
To: freedomdefender
And ideology trumped gender in this case, right? Maybe qualfifcations trumped it as well, Katie.
This notion that there are not seats on the court 'reserved' for certain types of people is false and dangerous.
Would Katie agree that 'Thomas's' seat was reserved for another black conservative when he goes? I think not.
31 posted on
10/31/2005 10:33:15 AM PST by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: freedomdefender
JRB would have been easier to get through, though I pray Alito is confirmed.
32 posted on
10/31/2005 10:33:31 AM PST by
TAdams8591
(It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson