Why is it real documented voter fraud is never found or covered by the MSN? Could it be because the (alleged)fraud was committed by Democrats?
1 posted on
10/29/2005 6:32:55 PM PDT by
LowNslow
To: LowNslow
Send it to Drudge, then you'll really get ignored...
2 posted on
10/29/2005 6:39:10 PM PDT by
xcamel
(No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
To: LowNslow
Oooooohhhhh......Someone is going to do some jailtime over this one. Probably the bureaucrat that failed to destroy the evidence...
3 posted on
10/29/2005 6:40:59 PM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: LowNslow
Democrats cannot, by law, commit voter fraud.
/sarcasm
4 posted on
10/29/2005 6:42:22 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: LowNslow
Voter fraud? Wahington State was nothing less than a coup d'etat by the King County machine.
To: LowNslow
[deep sigh] The mess in King county seems endless
To: LowNslow
This really is a big story. I just wish I could cite a source other than the one that published this story. A place that called Democrats "Dimocrats" is so biased source it would be immediately discarded. Is there somewhere in the mainstream media where this stuff is being published, and I can point to it as a reliable source?
9 posted on
10/29/2005 7:13:24 PM PDT by
CometBaby
(You can twist perceptions .. reality won't budge!)
To: LowNslow
![](http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/pentagram/casablanca/claude02.jpg)
do I REALLY have to say it???
10 posted on
10/29/2005 7:14:36 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: LowNslow; sweetliberty; nicmarlo
Can't have the MSM uncovering the truth about their Democrat buddies, now can we?
11 posted on
10/29/2005 7:17:26 PM PDT by
TheLion
To: LowNslow
And they get away with it. Over and over and over.......
12 posted on
10/29/2005 7:25:14 PM PDT by
Just Lori
(Tony Schaeffer, Curt Weldon, Able Danger....... PAY ATTENTION.)
To: LowNslow
To: LowNslow
Maybe they can get Fitzgerald to look into this. According to the MSM he's the toughest prosecutor since Hammurabi. Of course, if he starts looking into this Democrat you can bet that his I.Q. will drop 20 points, and we'll find out that he has a boyfriend named Bruce.
To: LowNslow
Sorry to say, but this should be filed under "what happens when a tree falls in the desert".
20 posted on
10/30/2005 5:27:43 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Everything points to it so why not call them the Whigs?)
To: LowNslow
Why is it real documented voter fraud is never found or covered by the MSN? For one thing, the MSM is often referred to the lame stream media -- they are proving how really lame they are.
For another thing, pretty faces are more a requirement to be in the lame stream media -- not intelligence.
The conservative movement has quite a bit of intelligence on their side -- in terms of those who provide coverage of things. Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin may be pretty faces, but they are also have much more intelligence that their liberal counterparts. I consider this to be the norm for the conservatives who are involved in the media -- though there are exceptions...
Also be careful about talking MSN versus MSM when talking about Seattle -- someone might think you are talking about Microsoft...
21 posted on
10/30/2005 5:30:20 AM PST by
topher
(Please let Old-Fashioned moral values return to the United States!)
To: LowNslow
Too bad the WA Republican Party gave up, turned tail and ran right after they lost Round 1 to Judge Earring.
All anybody will remember now is that "Judge Earring said she won" - nobody will remember the 1,678 certified illegal votes.
So we go three more years without a governor, stuck with some fraudulent bitch bothering us, while Rossi puts out silly books.
26 posted on
10/30/2005 9:20:59 AM PST by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: LowNslow
If there is a real sharp Republican Congressman or Senator out there he or she will figure out a way to amend the next extension of the voting rights act to extend coverage to this type of crap. Conspiring to disenfranchise voters should be a crime when committed by Democrats in the 1970's South and in the turn of the century Northwest (or Chicago or anywhere else). Time to quit being a door mat for Democrat political corruption.
To: LowNslow
Why is it real documented voter fraud is never found or covered by the MSN? Could it be because the (alleged)fraud was committed by Democrats?Ding, ding, ding, we have a winnah!!!
37 posted on
11/01/2005 5:36:56 AM PST by
GOPJ
(Is every democrat a bent kneed Monica?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson