Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush narrows Supreme Court selection to 2, sources say(great picks IMHO!!!)
Mercury News ^ | Sat, Oct. 29, 2005 | JAN CRAWFORD GREENBURG

Posted on 10/29/2005 5:23:51 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

WASHINGTON - Rebounding from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, President Bush is poised to select between two of the nation's leading conservative federal appeals court judges - both experienced jurists with deep backgrounds in constitutional law - for what promises to be a bruising Senate confirmation battle.

With an announcement expected Sunday or Monday, administration officials have narrowed the focus to Judges Samuel Alito of New Jersey and Michael Luttig of Virginia, sources involved in the process said. Both have sterling legal qualifications and solid conservative credentials, and both would set off an explosive fight with Senate Democrats, who are demanding a more moderate nominee to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: New Jersey; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: alito; conservative; constitution; fourthcircuit; judicialnominees; luttig; michaelluttig; miers; nomoresouters; originalist; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-264 last
To: hillary's_fat_a**

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lost+liberty+hotel+%22atlas+shrugged%22&btnG=Google+Search


261 posted on 10/30/2005 5:59:56 AM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: chet_in_ny

Only the good half right????????


262 posted on 10/30/2005 6:07:37 AM PST by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
OK, the full sentence, starting off his opinion, was:

"I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), to be a decision of super-stare decisis with respect to a woman's fundamental right to choose whether or not to proceed with a pregnancy."

In the context of what was going on, that's a little better than what was quoted in the Slate piece. So I guess he's off the hook. For now.

Thanks for the link, by the way.

263 posted on 10/30/2005 9:44:57 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

You sure got that right!!! That is the way President Bush thinks - he is a gentleman - considering all the hateful things people have accused him of and called him!! And thoughtful concern of Harriet Miers would be a part of his next decision...


264 posted on 10/30/2005 2:11:04 PM PST by Anita1 (You can't argue against the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-264 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson