Skip to comments.
CNN: HARRIET MIERS HAS WITHDRAWN!
Posted on 10/27/2005 5:54:48 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
just breaking!!!!!!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0; 00000000000000000000; 00000nosantorum; 000sorryfirstkeyword; 0notsofast1stkeyword; 0real1stkeyword; 1firstkeyword; alangreenspan; alito; alltogethernow; angieharmon; borked; botsuicidewatch; bradpitt; brown; bushsquagmier; dealwithit; edithbrownclement; faves; fredthompson; harrietemiers; harrietmiers; harrietthemere; hightechlynching; humphreybogart; janicerbrown; janicerogersbrown; jellopudding; jrb; judgeclement; judicialnominees; luttig; marklevinforscotus; miers; noloyaltytopresident; noricksantorum; rightsviolated; rino; sadday; santorumdogcatcher08; scotus; snugasabuginarug; sorrybushbots; spinelessrinos; stupidsenatetricks; traitorrepubs; unjustandunfair; victory; withdrawal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
To: Liberty Valance
If she's not nominated it could only be because there are things about her we don't know. If it's something she did, and regrets, and overcame, then I do not care. It'll just be a part of her backstory.
681
posted on
10/27/2005 6:39:52 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: conservativecorner
This crap that he won, and he picks with no consensus is ludicrous, and you really need to read some history History? I see many people here who can't seem to recall the last 12-24 months and countless filibusters. I want to know what the all those who erroneously claim to represent the entire base, led by Bork, Kristol, Coulter, etc. are going to do to tame the Senate...and why they didn't do it earlier?
682
posted on
10/27/2005 6:39:54 AM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: conservativecorner
Obviously the conservative movement made their case against Miers and obviously did a good job of it.
I would argue that a "true conservative" at least in the mold you appear to espouse, would never win an election as President. Witness Buchanan, Falwell, and even McCain in 2000. That's history. Bush ran as a compasionate Conservative, he won. It's a big tent, but Miers was very much towards the outside of the tent. Bush failed to recognize this.
To: RushCrush
I am serious. A brief reading from
Wikipedia has me concerned about
Kasler v. Lockyer, but much is dependent on how the decision reads since there is no right to firearm ownership guaranteed by the California Constitution.
684
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:00 AM PDT
by
Tree of Liberty
(requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
To: bonfire
"Amen" on a 666 post. LOL I saw that too....
685
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:03 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: ALWAYSWELDING
I wonder if this was planned. I know I'm silly.
686
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:11 AM PDT
by
angcat
To: tiki
"I think Bush is loyal but he hasn't shown signs of being extremely vindictive."
Since the President has not been vindictive toward Bill Clinton there is no reason to think he would he be vidictive toward conservatives.
To: Homer1
Bush's limo driverBill Kristol says NO. Or he will go back on his hunger strike. :-)
688
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:17 AM PDT
by
auboy
("Don't get stuck on whiny")
To: areafiftyone
Did you know that a Conservative Christian group took a whole full blown ad out yesterday in a paper asking Bush to withdraw Miers? How pathetic is that when they don't even know what she is like? And that stuff is going to be trumpeted to the hills by the Dems for anyone remotely conservative Bush sends up next.
Opposing Miers and defeating her nomination may have been the right thing to do. But the manner in which it was done is going to come back and bite us big-time. Conservatives who are crowing about this and demanding to be given "credit" are playing right into the hands of the Dems and RINO's.
To: JesseJane
Let's hope we see Brown or Owens sent up. I like this guy:
Senator John Kyl - a strong conservative who would breeze through the Senate confirmation process.
690
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:19 AM PDT
by
TonyInOhio
("Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants.")
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
From your response, I'm not sure if you agree or don't. If you think the democrats won here, I'd have to disagree.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I THINK THIS WAS A WELL PLAYED POKER HAND TO BEGIN WITH- THEY COMPLAINED MIERS DIDNT HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS, NOW THEY CANT COMPLAIN THAT BROWN DOESN'T
YAHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
692
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:23 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: Ramcat
The Miers disaster was the handiwork of Andy Card, a house of mush. If Bush wants to get back on his game, he had better look to Karen Williams or Edith Jones or Michael Luttig etc.
I don't believe it will be Owen or Rogers-Brown.
693
posted on
10/27/2005 6:40:28 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: JesseJane
As I've said, I think Miers was a decoy to draw the heavy fire from the dems. Now, Bush nominates Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown. It's hard for dems to oppose the second nominaton, especially of someone they already confirmed for the court of appeals.
To: GraniteStateConservative
695
posted on
10/27/2005 6:41:12 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Take two - this time, nominate a conservative, not someone who would be at least as bad as O'Connor.)
To: sinkspur
The good news is that, hopefully, the ubers will now support whomever Bush puts forward. That's entirely up to Bush. He can cough up another mediocrity, and be abandoned by his base, or he can give his followers a nominee worth fighting for.
696
posted on
10/27/2005 6:41:12 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: buckeyeblogger
Will President Bush now nominate a verifiable judicial conservative or will he be angry at "us" (the base that didn't support Miers) and start meeting with Chuck Schumer and whoever to get their insight on whom to nominate? Just something to ponder..
Nothing to ponder at all...it really quite simple...if he's "angry at us", he and the Republican party can just be considered impotent till '08 and hurt in the wallet come election time in '06 and in '08. It would be an extremely DUMB move on his part.
697
posted on
10/27/2005 6:41:19 AM PDT
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
To: SoFloFreeper; Java Guy; All
Bush will commit political suicied if he nominates anything less than a solid conservative originalist after the conservative backlash.
698
posted on
10/27/2005 6:41:19 AM PDT
by
tame
(Are you willing to be as SHAMELESS for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
To: TonyInOhio
a strong conservative who would breeze through the Senate confirmation process.Sorry...oxymoron.
699
posted on
10/27/2005 6:41:33 AM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: kjam22
Who got the closest: Guess time/date of Miers withdrawal???
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680, 681-700, 701-720 ... 3,421-3,436 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson