Posted on 10/24/2005 11:49:49 AM PDT by AliVeritas
All welcome. Come and discuss.
(Excerpt) Read more at wabcradio.com ...
Thank you. 8)
I also believe the same crooks at the CIA are somehow related to the Able Danger cover-up, although the DIA is the actual agency that pulled Lt. Col Schaeffer's job and pay! Seems to me that there are way too many RATS scurrying about in our gov't agencies. We need PEST Control in DC right away!
And that most of these investigations usually lead to something totally different than what they started out to do. Especially when they have these people in front of the grand jury more than once, you can easily get conflicting stories about items because of the time frames.
Many people don't remember who or what they talked about 2 1/2 years ago, and if they do, it might be foggy, or it might not be the same as they said 6 months prior to that. Both dems and republicans dislike the special prosecuter for those and a host of other reasons.....
I agree, and I think Sean just voiced a speculation that many of us have had for a good while - somebody is leaking from within the WH.
So Brit figures it's not even the CIA leak thing anymore. It's obstruction or some other charge. And that it'll be a shame to lose Rove on W's team since he has such a great political sense about him, though his possible resigning won't totally cripple W, it'll hurt for a bit.
somebody is leaking from within the WH.
Andrea Mitchell slipped on Hardball one night and said it was Colin Powell.
I asked you to post the thread on Friday and I need you to do it again this Friday! :)
But conflicting stories are just that. Couched in terms of IIRC, to the best of my knowledge, etc. it would be hard to get a perjury conviction.
You're right. But the indictment alone would be damaging big time, no?
I'd be surprised if he was the only one.
Might just be enough to wake up the adults in the Democrat party that they need to take their party back from the Mike Moore and the Moveon.org kiddies. If they lose badly in 2006 they really will have no way to rationalize their defeat like they have after every election since 1994.
That actually would be a good thing. An effective Dem party is needed to keep the Repbs from getting complacent in power.
"TWO Senate majority leaders"
We know you meant Senate minority leaders.
These presstitutes are always carping on Bush using "un-named" or "anonymous" sources, the DUmocrats dirty laundry needs to air to the public each time a DUmocrat or LIEberal RINO is up for election. The GOP needs to realize that the DUmocrats can't get elected without slanderous scandal-mongering and vote fraud and take the gloves off.
Remember the news conference Chucky had with Wilson
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/14/AR2005071402023.html)?
Now, who is Chucky close to? And who was Miller so afraid to name that she did time? Who are all the girlfriends and wives of certain MSM figures who knew ahead of time connected to? Remember when it was said Schumer was Wilson's "handler"?
Flashbacks:
With Schumer
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/cnn_lt_schumer_wilson_press_conf_050714-01.wmv
Wilson on the Today Show
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/nbc_today_wilson_interview_050714-01.wmv
Peter King goes off on the media:
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Scarborough_King_shoot%20_Russert.wmv
Flashbacks:
http://www.mishalov.com/Clinton_IndefensiblePardon.html
Our list:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a94a2736a14.htm
I know, I go to the store and that's the first thing I see. I just shook my head...
Okay, NOW I'm up to speed on that. Good for Doug!!! Thanks for posting those! 8) One more reason to despise susan estrich. She's just a liberal hack who is more concerned with propping up any liberal, even if they're a rapist. Shows her real priorities. She's a liberal first, and a rape survivor second. She is a total joke.
If there was any indication that Rove or Libby did something wrong, I'd be worried. But as DeLay has proven, in this day and age of out of power desperate liberals, an indictment does not a guilty person make. You don't have to be guilty to be indicted when you're a powerful Republican. Why are there no lower level less important Republicans who have been found to have done things wrong? Why is it only the leadership and the most pivotal conservatives that have been "discovered" to have broken laws? That is pretty conspicuous to me. There have been no laws broken by DeLay, or Frist, or Rove, or Libby. But democrats are out of power and every two years more and more of them are out of power, and in the far off distant cold world of Liberal Utopia, defeating democrats IS a crime. And they're behaving as such in the real world.
The Hatch Act? Haven't heard that angle before.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.