Posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:04 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
All About Iraq October 24, 2005
Rampant leaks notwithstanding, no one but Patrick Fitzgerald knows all of the criminal evidence the special prosecutor is considering against senior White House officials. Our hope is that he also understands that the job of a prosecutor is not to settle what at bottom is a political and policy fight over the war in Iraq.
Let's stipulate that the law is the law, and if Bush administration officials lied to a grand jury in the clear and obvious way that Bill Clinton did, they should be prosecuted. If Mr. Fitzgerald has evidence of a malicious attempt to expose a CIA undercover agent, as defined by the relevant statute, the same applies. But the fact that the prosecutor has waited as long as he has -- until the last days of his grand jury -- suggests that he considers this a less than obvious case. A close call deserves to be a no call.
All the more so because this entire probe began and has continued as a kind of proxy for the larger political war about the Iraq War. In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA consultant to accuse the Bush administration of lying about Iraq WMD as an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President campaign.
Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush administration officials understandably fought back. One way they did so was to tell reporters that Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true -- though Mr. Wilson denied it at the time -- as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee documented in 2004.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Darn! The complete article is available only to subscribers!
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007447
Try this. You just need an e-mail address to sign/read.
Fitz should act on the limited mandate of his appointment(if any action is required),and having done so,shut down.
In the end,whatever he does,it will define the quality of his integrity.
Yes, well written.
Here is the link for those who aren't suscribed to the WSJ:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007447
Thank you both for the helpful information and links. Good article; one of the few I've read recently that actually makes sense.
IF this is what the "investigation" is about, then Mr. Fitzgerald owes the American people their money back. It was ascertained a long time ago that Plame WAS NOT A CIA UNERCOVER AGENT.
But, he requested and has apparently gotten authority to expand the probe to cover other aspects of the case, like obstruction blah blah blah.
("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")
bttt
For sure!
It will be for fame and fortune.
The WSJ gets it nearly exactly right.
I think that enough money has been wasted by this group for the benefit of the Democrats in this nation.
As a taxpayer I am disgusted with the whole deal. Only Democrats can get away with rampant corruption.
Looks like tying the obvious partisan attack on Delay to Fitz' actions could be used to discredit both as a 'Rat/MSM planned attack.
Mr. Wilson's original claims about what he found on a CIA trip to Africa, what he told the CIA about it, and even why he was sent on the mission have since been discredited. What a bizarre irony it would be if what began as a politically motivated lie by Mr. Wilson nonetheless leads to indictments of Bush Administration officials for telling reporters the truth.
"As for Mr. Bush, we hope he realizes that anyone who is indicted was defending his policy and his Presidency. He should consider carefully the nature of the charges and the evidence before he dismisses his most loyal advisers."
This concluding paragraph gives me a bad feeling.
And, this is off-topic, but I must say it, Bush has picked a darn poor time to alienate so many of his base with the bizarre nomination of Harriet Meirs for SCOTUS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.