Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All About Iraq (WSJ Editorial Calling on Fitzgeral to Close Shop)
WSJ ^

Posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:04 PM PDT by indianrightwinger

All About Iraq October 24, 2005

Rampant leaks notwithstanding, no one but Patrick Fitzgerald knows all of the criminal evidence the special prosecutor is considering against senior White House officials. Our hope is that he also understands that the job of a prosecutor is not to settle what at bottom is a political and policy fight over the war in Iraq.

Let's stipulate that the law is the law, and if Bush administration officials lied to a grand jury in the clear and obvious way that Bill Clinton did, they should be prosecuted. If Mr. Fitzgerald has evidence of a malicious attempt to expose a CIA undercover agent, as defined by the relevant statute, the same applies. But the fact that the prosecutor has waited as long as he has -- until the last days of his grand jury -- suggests that he considers this a less than obvious case. A close call deserves to be a no call.

All the more so because this entire probe began and has continued as a kind of proxy for the larger political war about the Iraq War. In July 2003, Joseph Wilson used his insider status as a former CIA consultant to accuse the Bush administration of lying about Iraq WMD as an excuse to go to war. A political furor erupted, and Mr. Wilson became an antiwar celebrity who joined the Kerry for President campaign.

Amid an election campaign and a war, Bush administration officials understandably fought back. One way they did so was to tell reporters that Mr. Wilson's wife, CIA analyst Valerie Plame, had been instrumental in getting him the CIA consulting job. This was true -- though Mr. Wilson denied it at the time -- as a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee documented in 2004.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: antiwar; bush; cia; cialeak; fitzgerald; iraq; libby; plame; plameleak; rove; valerieplame; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
This editorial lays out the issues at hand as clearly as I have seen. Close shop Mr. Fitzgerald!
1 posted on 10/23/2005 11:24:05 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Darn! The complete article is available only to subscribers!


2 posted on 10/23/2005 11:29:50 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Its about criminalizing policy differences. Those should be settled by voters not decided in the courts through questionable prosecutions.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

3 posted on 10/23/2005 11:31:02 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
Look up the editorial on the WSJ's sister site OpinionJournal.com. You can read the Journal's editorial content there every day for free.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

4 posted on 10/23/2005 11:32:29 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007447

Try this. You just need an e-mail address to sign/read.


5 posted on 10/23/2005 11:34:42 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Good read.

Fitz should act on the limited mandate of his appointment(if any action is required),and having done so,shut down.

In the end,whatever he does,it will define the quality of his integrity.

6 posted on 10/23/2005 11:36:39 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Yes, well written.

Here is the link for those who aren't suscribed to the WSJ:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007447




7 posted on 10/23/2005 11:37:15 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger; goldstategop

Thank you both for the helpful information and links. Good article; one of the few I've read recently that actually makes sense.


8 posted on 10/23/2005 11:51:24 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
If Mr. Fitzgerald has evidence of a malicious attempt to expose a CIA undercover agent .....

IF this is what the "investigation" is about, then Mr. Fitzgerald owes the American people their money back. It was ascertained a long time ago that Plame WAS NOT A CIA UNERCOVER AGENT.

9 posted on 10/23/2005 11:53:12 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ("The Constitution: It ain't long. It ain't complicated and only idiot lawyers can make it so." A D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

But, he requested and has apparently gotten authority to expand the probe to cover other aspects of the case, like obstruction blah blah blah.


10 posted on 10/23/2005 11:56:08 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
Exactly. Plame was a desk agent at the CIA. It has been established she was never a covert operative and her ties to Langley have been an open secret in Washington. There was no crime committed here even by a very strict reading of the law. If Rove and Libby are indicted, it certainly won't be for the alleged offense that had the MSM in such an uproar for the past year.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

11 posted on 10/23/2005 11:56:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

bttt


12 posted on 10/23/2005 11:57:26 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
I used to laugh at the French system where indicted politicians stay in power until they are convicted of a crime.

It is a shame, but the Democrats are forcing us towards the French model of governance, because Democrat justice officials seek to attack our elected Republican representatives (Delay and possibly Rove, etc)by forcing them to resign with bogus indictments.
13 posted on 10/24/2005 12:46:29 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody
IF this is what the "investigation" is about, then Mr. Fitzgerald owes the American people their money back. It was ascertained a long time ago that Plame WAS NOT A CIA UNDERCOVER AGENT.

For sure!

14 posted on 10/24/2005 12:47:39 AM PDT by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If Rove and Libby are indicted, it certainly won't be for the alleged offense that had the MSM in such an uproar for the past year.

It will be for fame and fortune.

15 posted on 10/24/2005 1:14:38 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

The WSJ gets it nearly exactly right.


16 posted on 10/24/2005 1:18:17 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

I think that enough money has been wasted by this group for the benefit of the Democrats in this nation.

As a taxpayer I am disgusted with the whole deal. Only Democrats can get away with rampant corruption.


17 posted on 10/24/2005 1:22:05 AM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Looks like tying the obvious partisan attack on Delay to Fitz' actions could be used to discredit both as a 'Rat/MSM planned attack.


18 posted on 10/24/2005 1:30:23 AM PDT by Paladin2 (MSM rioted over Katrina and looted the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
This paragraph from the editorial is PERFECT:
Mr. Wilson's original claims about what he found on a CIA trip to Africa, what he told the CIA about it, and even why he was sent on the mission have since been discredited. What a bizarre irony it would be if what began as a politically motivated lie by Mr. Wilson nonetheless leads to indictments of Bush Administration officials for telling reporters the truth.

19 posted on 10/24/2005 1:42:33 AM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger; All

"As for Mr. Bush, we hope he realizes that anyone who is indicted was defending his policy and his Presidency. He should consider carefully the nature of the charges and the evidence before he dismisses his most loyal advisers."

This concluding paragraph gives me a bad feeling.

And, this is off-topic, but I must say it, Bush has picked a darn poor time to alienate so many of his base with the bizarre nomination of Harriet Meirs for SCOTUS.


20 posted on 10/24/2005 2:05:51 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson