Skip to comments.
ACLU allied with porn industry?
Worldnet Daily ^
| October 22, 2005
| James L. Lambert
Posted on 10/22/2005 4:00:46 PM PDT by Jay777
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Prime Choice
ACLU is a truly perverted organization. Bill O'Reilly and Wendy Murphy are among the relatively few people in the media who I have heard speak out against it.
21
posted on
10/22/2005 4:36:52 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Jay777
ACLU also goes into frenzy over religion - they sure hate prayer of any kind and the Ten Commandments.
22
posted on
10/22/2005 4:44:32 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Jay777
how many times have AMERICANS raised hell im public about this-is it not time to keep our children from becoming prey-is it not time to say enough is enough-DAMN THOSE THAT ABUSE AND USE SEX AS AN EXCUSE-AMERICA THE POLICE WILL NEVER STOP IT THE JUDGES AND LAWYERS WILL DO NOTHING-is it time to start kicking ass and taking names-if we do nothing we are damned to loose a generation-like we have already lost in the past-
23
posted on
10/22/2005 4:44:46 PM PDT
by
catmanblack.
(he is the great I AM-)
To: indianrightwinger
24
posted on
10/22/2005 4:46:35 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: mlc9852
Situation normal , just...
AFU!
25
posted on
10/22/2005 4:50:48 PM PDT
by
pointsal
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Stingy Dog
27
posted on
10/22/2005 5:17:49 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Jay777
EXCLUSIVE ACLU AREA IN HELL NEARLY COMPLETE
Preparations for an ACLU-only area in Hell are nearly complete, underground construction sources said yesterday. The area, more than 3 square miles of "hotter than usual" turf, will hold members of the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization whose sole objective has become the elimination of Christmas.
"There's a mini-volcano there burping up hot lava and everything," said an anonymous representative of Otherwordly Construction, Inc. The company recently sold its soul to the devil for the exclusive, no-bid offer of expanding Hell. A feature story in an upcoming issue of Architectural Digest will reveal the exclusive area of Hell for ACLU members.
The construction project is believed to be the first known addition to Hell since the 1940s, when Nazi and Japanese war criminals headed for their eternal damnation en masse. An anonymous spokesman for the construction company worried that "Hell may too good for these folks. When they move down here property values are just going to hit rock bottom. And when their neighbors find out 40,000 lawyers are living next door, this place is really going to explode. It's going to get pretty hot, let me tell you."
Analysts estimate the ACLU expansion of Hell increases 10 square feet for every nativity scene protested and 5 square feet for every time someone is forced to say "Happy Winter Solstice" instead of "Merry Christmas."
ACLU members working on removing "God" from the Pledge of Allegiance and U.S. coinage can expect their own separate inferno.
Otherworldly Construction says their next project will be the judges' condominium, Endless Torment Terrace. Nothing special, according to the builders, just the regulation fiery pit accomodations.
28
posted on
10/22/2005 5:19:47 PM PDT
by
Liberty Wins
(Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
To: Jay777
29
posted on
10/22/2005 5:21:42 PM PDT
by
Burlem
To: Stingy Dog
The ACLU has always been abuser-protective......!
30
posted on
10/22/2005 5:22:06 PM PDT
by
katya8
To: Jay777
Thanks for the link I was wondering if there was an agency that has a campiagn against the ACLU.
To: coconutt2000
Say someone hires two hookers to have sex with one another...
How about this scenario: For a hundred bucks you can enroll in our "acting class". You can even perform in one of our "plays". If you are the shy type, we have "modern operas", but you will have to wear a mask.
32
posted on
10/22/2005 5:34:00 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: Jay777
Nope! Came across it here on FR and saved it off for later use.
33
posted on
10/22/2005 5:41:39 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Jay777
May the "God of all flesh" reward the organization as a whole and its' individual membership accordingly.
34
posted on
10/22/2005 5:58:57 PM PDT
by
Spirited
To: Jay777
"I get so freakin' mad..."
35
posted on
10/22/2005 6:09:37 PM PDT
by
Old Seadog
(Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
To: Old Seadog
AND WE DO LITTLE OR NOTHING TO STOP THEM.
36
posted on
10/22/2005 6:46:02 PM PDT
by
calrighty
(Taglines for sale or let......1 liners 50 cents! C'mon troops, finish em off!!)
To: coconutt2000
"Say someone hires two hookers to have sex with each other.
Is that prostitution or art?
Neither. It's commerce. It's precisely the modus operandi of a producer of porn films.
37
posted on
10/22/2005 8:01:53 PM PDT
by
willyboyishere
("When the superficial wearies me, it wearies me so much that I need an abyss in order to rest".....)
To: Jay777
There used to be a time when the feminist crowd was against porn...until Larry Flynt came to the defense of the sexual harasser and rapist.
38
posted on
10/22/2005 8:03:32 PM PDT
by
Panic in the Streets
("Mayor, I've confirmed the data: the hippies ARE planning a massive jam band concert!"- Eric Cartman)
To: All
Now let's look at the facts instead:
In 1982, the ACLU became involved in a case involving the distribution of child pornography (New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 [15].) In a controversial amicus brief, the ACLU argued that the New York State law in question "has criminalized the dissemination, sale or display of constitutionally protected non-obscene materials which portray juveniles in sexually related roles", while arguing that child pornography deemed obscene under the Miller test deserved no constitutional protection and could be banned [16]. The ACLU's stance on this case has drawn great criticism from conservatives [17]. In a 2002 letter, the ACLU stated that it "opposes child pornography that uses real children in its depictions" [18]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Now what is the Miller test:
The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California. It has three parts: *Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, *Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law, *Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
The third condition is also known as the SLAPS test. The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.
So the truth content of Reisman's claim that the ACLU "legalized simulated intercourse, real intercourse, lewd conduct ... with children" is just about zero and the WND article just another rightwing attack at the ACLU.
39
posted on
10/24/2005 8:52:10 AM PDT
by
Simon666
(Think for yourself instead of letting people do it for you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson