Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House warns holdouts
U.S.News.com ^ | 10/13/05 | Kenneth T. Walsh

Posted on 10/13/2005 5:47:35 PM PDT by baystaterebel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 621-633 next last
To: WOSG
"And in a couple of years, when it turns out she is a scalia or thomas,

How do you know that? Please tell me!

What will she say that? When will she say it? What cases will this pertain to?? Don't go south on me ya hear? Tell me!

301 posted on 10/13/2005 8:45:18 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Presidential nominations are the product of voting him in. There are no consultations with the Ultra Ultras required by the Constitution to make them.

Originalists believe in sticking to what the Founders intended and they did not want the electorate involved. They placed the choice carefully and deliberately in the hands of the Executive with approval in the Senate.


302 posted on 10/13/2005 8:45:22 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: falpro; Cboldt

One Point: Cboldt


303 posted on 10/13/2005 8:45:31 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Most people on the thread are not trashing her. It is a relatively small handful of whiny malcontents. Treason is as treason does.


304 posted on 10/13/2005 8:45:41 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

The only thing that would be REALLY galling would be a Senator who voted FOR Ginsburg to come out against Miers and try to explain the higher scrutiny needed for a Bush pick over a Clinton pick.



You are asolutely correct. Two wrongs DO make a right.


305 posted on 10/13/2005 8:46:06 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (Dude seriously, if you don't quit being so poor I'm gonna start huckin' rocks at ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Purely politically speaking, it would be foolish of the voters in PA to vote out Santorum. He would be the next Majority Whip, a very powerful position with great clout. In addition to that, if the GOP lost the majority as a result, their other Senator would lose his powerful committee chairmanships.

Not to mention the fact that Santorum has stuck his neck out for conservatives and taken the beatings from the press numerous times. Amazingly there are people on this forum that call him a liberal. Those people are simply too dishonest and/or too stupid to be listened to.


306 posted on 10/13/2005 8:46:23 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

justshutupupandtakeit------Tellthemtheyallsuck!


307 posted on 10/13/2005 8:46:44 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
I prefer this one ya big dope.

title or description

308 posted on 10/13/2005 8:48:13 PM PDT by falpro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

If Santorum is goofy enough to vote against this woman he doesn't deserve to be in the Senate. We need people there who will SUPPORT the President not undermine him kowtowing to a tiny minority. The Nation must prevail in this war and those who undermine our leader in this fight are acting against the National interest.

But he won't he is a smart guy and a true conservative.


309 posted on 10/13/2005 8:48:27 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Originalists believe in sticking to what the Founders intended and they did not want the electorate involved. They placed the choice carefully and deliberately in the hands of the Executive with approval in the Senate.

Agreed. And I don't hear anyone here suggesting we overthrow the Constitution or even amend it to make democratically elected justices.

But we can express our disapproval when the Executive does something stupid.

310 posted on 10/13/2005 8:48:27 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Yep, even were our nominee defeated, we could have run the entire 2006 election on those grounds. I saw nominate the entire list of conservatives and force the Dems and RINOs to vote them down. We'd have turned the entire base out in passionate, firey intensity on a unifying principle. It worked like gangbusters in limited use in 04 (Thune anyone?). Now we get to run on current policy and Miers. As you can see, the base is pumped about it. Sigh.


311 posted on 10/13/2005 8:48:30 PM PDT by empirekin768
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: falpro

Cool picture. That says it all!


312 posted on 10/13/2005 8:48:51 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Those people are simply too dishonest and/or too stupid to be listened to.

Or too hard headed.

Great passion can cloud good judgement.

Save Rick!

313 posted on 10/13/2005 8:49:01 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (you call me a right wing extremist and a Rushbot like it's a bad thing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: falpro

No sense of humor, I see.


314 posted on 10/13/2005 8:49:19 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: falpro

Hey, keep posting those real cool pictures!


315 posted on 10/13/2005 8:50:17 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Well you know how genteel those GOP mutinies are. A raised eyebrow is serious disagreement.


316 posted on 10/13/2005 8:51:40 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: empirekin768
Yep, even were our nominee defeated, we could have run the entire 2006 election on those grounds. I saw nominate the entire list of conservatives and force the Dems and RINOs to vote them down. We'd have turned the entire base out in passionate, firey intensity on a unifying principle. It worked like gangbusters in limited use in 04 (Thune anyone?). Now we get to run on current policy and Miers. As you can see, the base is pumped about it. Sigh.

Yep...but at least I didn't expect any better from this president. He's given plenty of warning that he's not a conservative, so I didn't have much hope.

317 posted on 10/13/2005 8:52:18 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Well mon..as I said the other day....

The confirmation would appear to be a done deal...they counted the votes...WH knows shes in. They can afford to be cocky and confrontational...Harry and his boys will make sure she gets enough democrat votes to put her over the top.

After all...the dems want her on the court now more than ever...shes damaged goods. And they'll use her down the road when the time is right.

I doubt they even need Coburn, Brownback, or Santorum as votes...but I guess they dont want it to look too arranged.

Yes sir...the 'coming out party' has begun.

Next up....IMMIGRATION.
318 posted on 10/13/2005 8:52:33 PM PDT by Dat Mon (still lookin for a good one....tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

See #7 for a view of the Real world.


319 posted on 10/13/2005 8:52:54 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; All
Most people on the thread are not trashing her. It is a relatively small handful of whiny malcontents. Treason is as treason does.

Cute. I will repeat what I said to you in my earlier post. And then that is the last time I will communicate with you as you are annoying and somewhat crazy:

"Honestly, your posts on this thread are so over the line that I suspect you think you are being funny. On the other hand, I fear you are not."

320 posted on 10/13/2005 8:53:33 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 621-633 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson