Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80% of Potential SCOTUS Nominees on W's List Decline His Offer
Fox News | 10-11-05 | freedom4me

Posted on 10/11/2005 9:08:44 PM PDT by freedom4me

During the 11:00 p.m. (CST) newsbreak, Donna Fuducia reported that Karl Rove told James Dobson that 80% of the potential SCOTUS nominees on the President's list declined his offer because of they didn't want to undergo the grueling confirmation process. Perhaps this sheds new light on the reason why W chose Miers.


TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush43; judicialnominees; miers; nothanks; rove; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 761-770 next last
To: nerdgirl

I have only gone on maybe 8 threads since this started, and after reading some of this horrible stuff about a decent christian lady, I got sick. I am so heartsick by this behavior, I can never ever forgive those horrible people for the things they said. I though I had accidentally got criss crossed with DU. A lot of the trolls from Du teamed up with the freepers that were in a frenzy of anger and hate and they were working together to slime her and the President. Go through some of the threads and you will see what I mean, but beware you may feel sick enough to throw up.


661 posted on 10/12/2005 12:35:47 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
"She may not be RBG herself, but there's no guarantee that she won't vote like her and adopt her half-baked, pseudo-Constitutional theories."

There is also no guarantee Ginsburg won't show up at the next Supreme Court hearing wearing pink pasties and a tutu. What kind of "guarantee" are you looking for?

662 posted on 10/12/2005 12:38:18 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Since the goal of the confirmation hearing for the candidate is to reveal as little as possible about oneself in order to get confirmed, and as John Fund has shown with his research Harriet Miers has learned this skill particularly well (the reason so little about her is known), it is doubtful at that time, we will learn much more about her.


663 posted on 10/12/2005 12:38:57 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: samantha
"Not only are they making these horrid remarks, but they keep posting and reposting the same lies and accusations that have been debunked time and again"

Where's the evidence proving the above? Find it and post it.

664 posted on 10/12/2005 12:44:09 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
There is also no guarantee Ginsburg won't show up at the next Supreme Court hearing wearing pink pasties and a tutu. What kind of "guarantee" are you looking for?

:-)

Remember, Do not dub me shapka broham requires that elusively compelling evidence nobody seems willing or able to provide.

665 posted on 10/12/2005 12:45:40 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: samantha
"A lot of the trolls from Du teamed up with the freepers that were in a frenzy of anger and hate and they were working together to slime her and the President"

That's a boldfaced lie.

Don't post to me again.

666 posted on 10/12/2005 12:51:06 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Thomas Sowell-and seemingly everyone else under the Sun, even those who have been critical of this nomination-have claimed that-and I'm paraphrasing here-"at least she won't be as bad as Sandra Day O'Connor."

There's no reason to believe that.

In fact, there are many to believe she might actually be worse.

O'Connor, whatever her faults-and they were manifold-was at the very least a committed federalist.

Can we say the same of Miers?

667 posted on 10/12/2005 12:52:48 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I have met Ann Coulter in person two years ago and she was delightful, signed my book and was very cute,funny,personable and accomodating. She was also very smart, and she was quick witted and up on everything. She was a star, past tense. Fast forward two years, she is totally the opposite and when she is not screeching and calling George Bush a drunk she is hanging out with Bill maher. she has become a caricature of herself. She sometimes loses her train of thought and then goes off on another rant. This is typical of women in their forties who are chain smokers. It is called early Menopause, and for some it is not pleasant and believe me I know what I am talking about. Any woman that has been through it knows when someone else is going through it. She has gone off the deep end many times lately, and says whatever is on her mind with no tact at all. those that really loved her hope she gets on hormones to break this self destructive behavior. She is an elitist and resents the fact that she busted her butt for a degree at Cornell fighting the commie pinko professors all along the way and she is not a Supreme Ct appointee, she never even practiced law. She appears on Hannity and Colmes and does lectures and writes books. What in the hell good is her degree to her now? Annie we love you, hormones,hormones I say. Mainline them and help us bring the Good Annie back.


668 posted on 10/12/2005 12:53:11 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
"That's a boldfaced lie."

Two questions...

1. How do you know?

2. Why do you think that post was directed at you?

669 posted on 10/12/2005 12:53:16 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

It is not a small group, go read the threads before you comment further. Seeing is believing.


670 posted on 10/12/2005 12:57:02 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
"There's no reason to believe that."

You hypocrite. You demand "compelling evidence" to refute your conjectures and assumptions, but rely on a complete lack of evidence to support those assumptions and conjectures.

671 posted on 10/12/2005 12:57:21 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
I know, I was on the threads.

And I don't think it was directed at me.

If it's so true, Samantha should post the proof.

672 posted on 10/12/2005 12:57:23 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: samantha
Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.

After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.

A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.

Give me one item from the resume of Harriet Miers as-or more-impressive than the accomplishments I have just enumerated.

I'm only asking for one.

673 posted on 10/12/2005 1:00:19 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I have heard nobody on the "let her have her hearing side" behave this way. If you do not want to be judged by that crowd of lunatics then tell them to stay away or shut up because you are getting lumped with them. We cannot blame Du for this, they are maybe a quarter of the slimers. I am proud of the Miers "Hearing" crowd,and glad to be linked with them. I love freepers, but cannot stand that fringe element that drags everyone down with them into the gutter.


674 posted on 10/12/2005 1:04:44 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Are you kidding with the Coulter post? You list her experience as a law clerk, private practice lawyer and her work for a Senator from Michigan. Have you somehow missed the fact that Miers served as the Counsel to the President of the United States. To put that in perspective, Roberts, for all his considerable experience, would have worked for her if they had served in the Whitehouse during the same period.
675 posted on 10/12/2005 1:12:26 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: nerdgirl

it is not crude, it is the truth and the woman is suffering and you can hear it in her voice. She needs help, and you do her no favors by telling her she is fine. She is not fine, and she is losing listeners because of her change of personality. I feel bad for her, and I know what it is like to go through Cancer, it is scary and you freak out sometimes, that loving mate is very important to get you through. Her situation is complicated by her ticking biological clock and a very emotional loss. She needs to take time off and get better before she loses all her listeners and gets sicker as a result. I hope you care enough for her to want her to heal.


676 posted on 10/12/2005 1:13:42 AM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
White House Counsel=The President's consigliere.

I suppose you were high on John Dean as well.

677 posted on 10/12/2005 1:14:27 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Even Scalia said he wouldn't want to have to go through it today.


678 posted on 10/12/2005 1:15:24 AM PDT by bethtopaz (Even a fool is considered wise when he is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: samantha

I have to agree with you here. Ann Coulter's presence these days elicits no excitement or interest from me -- I just change the channel or turn off the t.v.


679 posted on 10/12/2005 1:17:43 AM PDT by bethtopaz (Even a fool is considered wise when he is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
"I suppose you were high on John Dean as well."

John Dean was a criminal. And Bill Clinton is a perjurer. But neither the actions of Dean nor Clinton lower the importance of the offices they held. And you asked for only one thing on Miers' resume that was more impressive than what you listed from Coulter. Frankly, that isn't much of a challenge.

680 posted on 10/12/2005 1:18:31 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 761-770 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson