Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forest Service, bowing to court, embraces Scrooge
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | October 11, 2005 | By Audrey Hudson

Posted on 10/11/2005 11:14:53 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

A federal court ruling in favor of environmentalists is forcing the Forest Service to suspend more than 1,500 permits for activities ranging from fire prevention to Boy Scout meetings and also is threatening to delay cutting of the Capitol's Christmas tree until after the new year.

A Forest Service regulation that allowed projects determined as having minimal environmental impact to be exempt from environmental studies and reviews was challenged by the Earth Island Institute.

Judge James K. Singleton of the Eastern District Court of California ruled in July against a project to remove charred and damaged trees, which could kindle a future fire, in the Sequoia National Forest.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ecoping; environuts; forests; scroooged
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Earth remains in the balance! Environmentalists could ruin our planet even now!
1 posted on 10/11/2005 11:14:55 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

also is threatening to delay cutting of the Capitol's Christmas tree until after the new year.

And what is the real purpose of that?


2 posted on 10/11/2005 11:16:50 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Snottiness, one-upmanship, and a desire to flaunt their pathetically limited power!
3 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:49 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("They're thin and they were riding bicycles" - Ted Turner on NK malnutrition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
A federal court ruling in favor of environmentalists

The exact cause of the New Orleans flood of 2005!

4 posted on 10/11/2005 11:20:27 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Environmentalists don't care about black people!


5 posted on 10/11/2005 11:22:04 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper

ping


6 posted on 10/11/2005 11:23:17 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
How quickly the evirotwits forget the damage the BS policies cause...

The Rodeo-Chediski in 2002 and the Mt. Lemmon Fire in 2003 both here in Arizona were a perfect study in the damage their absurd policies cause. The forest service stated that both fires were harder to control, burned longer, and caused more damage. this was all due to the fact that The Sierra Club and its ilk sued to stop undergrowth clear out and sued to severely restrict controlled burns..

The envirotwits will end up doing more damage to the environment with the misguided science and policies then the will ever help.
7 posted on 10/11/2005 11:24:32 AM PDT by Americanwolf (I Served proudly.... how dare you tell me I have no convictions...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

The exact cause of the New Orleans flood of 2005!
---

I think they copied this from Front Page Mag. The story for those interested:
http://www.iconoclast.ca/MainPage.asp?page=/NewPage16.asp


8 posted on 10/11/2005 11:25:16 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

These crazy lawsuits are brought about by the fact that we just have too many laws. We need to repeal about half of them.


9 posted on 10/11/2005 11:26:17 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Exactly, what can a month or two possibly mean to a Christmas tree? I only hope there is someone in DC, that has the balls to just say that is a really stupid decision.


10 posted on 10/11/2005 11:28:28 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The proper solution to this problem is to sell the bulk of the land to private parties.

The federal government has no constitutional authority to own vast amounts of land.

11 posted on 10/11/2005 11:32:54 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

The government takes your land, forces you to pay taxes to maintain it and then ban's you from it.


12 posted on 10/11/2005 11:35:30 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Now there's an idea....

I'll bet the Sierra Club would give birth to kittens over that one.
13 posted on 10/11/2005 11:36:24 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("They're thin and they were riding bicycles" - Ted Turner on NK malnutrition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

That would be socialism! We need the ownership society to hurry up and get here.


14 posted on 10/11/2005 11:39:03 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("They're thin and they were riding bicycles" - Ted Turner on NK malnutrition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Whoever has control of environmental law controls the world.


15 posted on 10/11/2005 11:40:22 AM PDT by Maceman (Fake But Accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Google answers that question:

"Results 1 - 10 of about 74,000 English pages for environmentalism kills"

16 posted on 10/11/2005 11:41:29 AM PDT by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave; SLB; PoorMuttly; Eaker; wardaddy

OhhhhhhhhhhhhKay When these damn tree hugging socialists who support terrorism ban such as the Boy Scouts etc from the National Parks and BLM land then it Piracy vs environmentalism.........Time to cut these seditious little weeds from the crop.


17 posted on 10/11/2005 11:43:32 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

"I think they copied this from Front Page Mag. The story for those interested:"

No need to read it. I contracted to the Corps for years and participated in numerous conference calls where the main topic was how for the Corps to do it's job in NO while still appeasing the enviro-nazis. Far too often, the enviros flexed considerable legal and legislative muscle (read DEMOCRAT reps, and senators). We know now we can't have both.


18 posted on 10/11/2005 11:44:38 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Tagline fodder.....
19 posted on 10/11/2005 11:44:38 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Whoever has control of environmental law controls the world. - Maceman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Tagline fodder.....
20 posted on 10/11/2005 11:45:34 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Whoever has control of environmental law controls the world. - Maceman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson