Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/07/2005 2:34:38 AM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: pookie18

Definately needs more cowbell...

2 posted on 10/07/2005 2:38:19 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Tony Snow always gets the "DUH! Mr. Obvious!" Award from me...hyuk, hyuk!!!


3 posted on 10/07/2005 2:41:12 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Elites hate the nomination

Interesting article and take on the political savvy of the President. I would like point out that many Conservatives who dislike this nomination are not elites.
I would support Tony for the SCOTUS.

4 posted on 10/07/2005 2:46:18 AM PDT by msnimje (If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Dubya the gambler will enjoy the last laugh

Yes --- remember this:

****

GWB: HBS MBA

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1070924/posts

The American Thinker February 3, 2004 | Thomas Lifson

*****

One final note on George W. Bush’s management style and his Harvard Business School background does not derive from the classroom, per se. One feature of life there is that a subculture of poker players exists. Poker is a natural fit with the inclinations, talents, and skills of many future entrepreneurs. A close reading of the odds, combined with the ability to out-psych the opposition, leads to capital accumulation in many fields, aside from the poker table.

By reputation, the President was a very avid and skillful poker player when he was an MBA student. One of the secrets of a successful poker player is to encourage your opponent to bet a lot of chips on a losing hand. This is a pattern of behavior one sees repeatedly in George W. Bush’s political career. He is not one to loudly proclaim his strengths at the beginning of a campaign. Instead, he bides his time, does not respond forcefully, at least at first, to critiques from his enemies, no matter how loud and annoying they get. If anything, this apparent passivity only goads them into making their case more emphatically.

6 posted on 10/07/2005 2:47:18 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
The Supreme Court possesses unparalleled power for seducing those who don the black robes. No other officials in America can issue irreversible decrees. What the Supremes say, goes. Harriet Miers, the president suggested, won't get her head turned by such blandishments because she has principles. She'll remain true to conservative precepts and won't "grow" in office, regardless of what The New York Times says about her.

*****

Yep.

8 posted on 10/07/2005 2:53:50 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

As mad as I was about the pick of Ms. Miers, I'm starting to think that President Bush has roped the dopes again.

So what! She will be nothing but a VOTE when it comes down to it. She can be just as dumb as a rock but if, as GW says, "she has my judicial philosophy" and she has it for the next 20 years, who cares?!

She can sit and read comic books or do a good cross word puzzle and then ask some really good lawyer questions then VOTE Pro-life, Anti-Gay, Pro-business, Anti-envirowhackos and on and on and on...

A VOTE that will back the President and all of us on the Right.

I'm starting to think that this pick is nothing more than the dopes got roped again.


10 posted on 10/07/2005 3:02:40 AM PDT by ElephantinTexas (But IF the Islamofascists win their war, they have no PLAN. Kinda like the DemokRATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Bushbot article. I think a lot of these people overrate George W. Bush. Even as the Democrats underestimate him, I think many Republicans overestimate him.


11 posted on 10/07/2005 3:03:13 AM PDT by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Tony's pros/cons list was sort of interesting:

GW's pros:

Places high importance on character
Disdain for beltway culture

GW's cons:

Sometimes bows to political correctness
Unwilling to fight his political foes

12 posted on 10/07/2005 3:06:29 AM PDT by Huck ("I'm calling a moratorium on Miers/Bush/GOP bashing--but it won't be easy (thanks tex))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
From the article:

The upcoming confirmation hearings will determine her fate — and the president's. If she defies expectations, George Bush will look like a genius. If the Senate rejects her nomination, his presidency will come effectively to an end.

Good article but for that tidbit at the 'end'. The fact is this: W is the leader of the GOP, now, and will remain so for a long, long time. His stamp of approval for future nominees in future elections will be very eagerly sought. The Harriet nomination, whether it goes through or not will only strengthen W (primarily b/c of her Biblical World View).

Tony was right about the genius part, but if the nomination is torpedoed, the fault will solely rest w/ Rinos first, demonrats second. Harriet and Bush will have done their part to fantastically encourage or motivate the base. Either way, the Rinos/Demonrats are going to suffer b/c of Ms. Miers and her boss.

I'm considering taping the hearings it will be such a joy to watch....

17 posted on 10/07/2005 3:13:27 AM PDT by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1; doug from upland; Peach; Alamo-Girl; b4its2late; SweetCaroline; retrokitten; cripplecreek; ...

The latest from the Snow Man.


19 posted on 10/07/2005 3:20:20 AM PDT by Bahbah (Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Thanks Tony Snow. I don like you and respect you, but you worked for the Bush White House when this disaster happened.

Of all the people to talk about why we should not be worried, it should not be you.

21 posted on 10/07/2005 3:20:56 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Yeah duke it out with the back up of the gutless Republican Senators who passed the Terrorist Protection amendment yesterday as part of a Defense Appropriations bill 90-9. Good bleedin' luck on your "fight" Conservatives since your Senate has all ready surrendered.
35 posted on 10/07/2005 4:12:14 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Proud Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

I don't know what more the conservative critics want. As I read her qualifications and philosophy I perceive that Harriet Miers is the very candidate the Democrats feared most. She thinks like Dubya!

But they'll accept her. Ried even recommended her!


41 posted on 10/07/2005 4:32:52 AM PDT by RoadTest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Miers, in contrast to the polymath John Roberts, has little direct experience with constitutional law, and may know less about cases and precedents than such potential inquisitors as Sens. Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer. She hasn't spent time on the federal bench. She hasn't written sage articles for prestigious law reviews.

In short, she's an ignorant intellectual lightweight, a token, and a crony.

Somehow, that makes her a "superior" choice for the most important judicial body in America?

53 posted on 10/07/2005 5:28:26 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Great article.


54 posted on 10/07/2005 5:33:40 AM PDT by arjay (May God give President Bush strength and comfort in this time of struggle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
When critics yelped, White House aides panicked. For some reason, they failed to anticipate the conservative blowback, and when negative reviews began pouring in, presidential aides issued snarky retorts. (One pro-Miers website dismissed all the nominee's detractors as "naval gazers.")

I was a naval gazer when just a lad. Enjoyed watching all those ships come in the New York harbor... ;-)

56 posted on 10/07/2005 5:34:11 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18
Beltway "conservatives" gather to sink the Miers nomination.

"The name is 'Jackington.'"

66 posted on 10/07/2005 6:15:05 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Pretty good analysis. Of course, the referendum on the Iraqi constitution had better come out well for our side. Gambling is great so long as you win.


85 posted on 10/07/2005 8:27:15 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pookie18

Bump for later.


88 posted on 10/07/2005 8:30:57 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bttt


100 posted on 10/07/2005 9:49:40 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson