1 posted on
10/06/2005 2:53:03 PM PDT by
maryz
To: maryz
the time is fast approaching when such expressions should be muted until the Senate hearings begin. At that point, Ms. Miers will finally be able to speak for herself. And those on both sides of the political spectrum will be able to make a more informed judgment.Good advice.
2 posted on
10/06/2005 2:55:31 PM PDT by
Chuck54
(Free Tom DeLay)
To: maryz
Your opinion is not wanted, just your campaign donations and your votes. After the election is over, shut up and get in the back of the bus.
Message received loud and clear.
4 posted on
10/06/2005 2:57:08 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Corporatism is not conservatism - don't mistake this President for a conservative)
To: maryz
The Democrats don't need to say anything, they have the White House trying to push through a Michael Dukakis campaign contributor. You expect the Democrats to rally around the President in support of his nominee? That wouldn't help get Miers confirmed.
6 posted on
10/06/2005 3:02:38 PM PDT by
Jim_Curtis
(How do we prevent someone from torching his city if he will be rewarded as a lottery winner?)
To: maryz
the time is fast approaching when such expressions should be muted until the Senate hearings begin. At that point, Ms. Miers will finally be able to speak for herself. And those on both sides of the political spectrum will be able to make a more informed judgment.
The time is fast approaching when the Miers nomination be withdrawn and a suitable nominee be put forth.
We are not Democrats. We do not sit silently when our party or our President is wrong. Unlike the Democrats, we are and will remain free-thinkers. We get our talking points from no one.
To: maryz
And whose fault is this? Bush's for picking this woman in the first place. He could have picked a conservative whose credentials we have confidence in, and we could then go ahead and focus on the matter of beating back the Democrats and slapping the Rino's in line. But instead we are stuck trying to figure out if we have another Souter on our hands.
11 posted on
10/06/2005 3:12:59 PM PDT by
Dreagon
To: maryz
The "fighting among conservatives" that Fund refers to would be far less if the MSM were not taking sides and promoting exactly this result. It is utterly irrelevant. Confirmation of Miers as a Justice is a slam dunk. Click below.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "Harriet Miers and the 'Pigpen' Press"
19 posted on
10/06/2005 3:35:07 PM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(President Bush plays chess while his opponents are playing checkers.)
To: maryz
This sure doesn't seem like the John Fund on CSPAN this morning.
32 posted on
10/06/2005 4:55:12 PM PDT by
sefarkas
(why vote Democrat-lite???)
To: maryz
The Dems on the judiciary committee have such a strong need to bash Bush, that they won't be able to resist objecting to Miers' nomination (to some extent, at least.)
34 posted on
10/06/2005 5:14:27 PM PDT by
syriacus
(Estrada deserved a hearing and an up/down vote. Miers deserves a hearing and an up/down vote.)
To: maryz
I have looked for the proper thread to make these remarks and can not find it. So I am writing it here. Cut me some slack.
Did anyone see Gingrich on Hannity and Colmbs? He was asked about Freehs' book where Freeh is about to tell the world that Bill Clinton tried to shake down the leader of a foreign country. Did anyone hear it the way I heard it? This is astonishing. The Director of the FBI announcing that the President of the United States was shaking down a foreign leader for personal money? Good God. That is the biggest story of the century. Where is it? Did I dream it?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson