Posted on 10/05/2005 10:29:24 AM PDT by new yorker 77
She's polite. Shy. Smart. Modest. Hard-working. Goes to church. Helps the poor. She immediately won the praise of the leader of the Democrats in the Senate. And yet she may end up making Justices Scalia and Thomas look like a couple of card carrying lefties.
I'm exaggerating for effect, of course, but the point is that despite the dramatic tearing of flesh that has gone on in some conservative quarters over the last 48 hours, the indications are that Bush has chosen someone who is extremely culturally conservative. Based on what little we know at this point, he's also chosen someone who favors the Patriot Act, wider presidential authority and an aggressive national security posture.
I understand the disappointment on the right. Conservatives wanted a first-rate legal and ideological gladiator to go do battle with liberals in the Senate. Instead, Bush gave them the Church Lady.
But gladiators don't receive - nor should they expect to be given - any mercy from their opponents. A humble, accomplished, God-fearing woman is a different proposition. Those who know this process understand that the first few hours and days are absolutely critical in shaping the image of the nominee for the public. Thus far, aside from the griping of conservatives, Miers' public image is developing rather favorably and isn't being radically influenced by attacks from left-wing interest groups the way other nominations would have been.
George Will argues this morning that these types of political considerations are unimportant. Qualifications are all that matter and, according to Will, Miers isn't remotely qualified:
The wisdom of presumptive opposition to Miers's confirmation flows from the fact that constitutional reasoning is a talent -- a skill acquired, as intellectual skills are, by years of practice sustained by intense interest. It is not usually acquired in the normal course of even a fine lawyer's career.
I find this line of reasoning deeply elitist and unpersuasive. Will is setting a standard (years of practice of constitutional reasoning sustained by intense interest) that would exclude a vast number of people who would make perfectly fine justices (including Senators like Orrin Hatch) as well as a number of those who've served ably on the court (including William Rehnquist who spent 16 years in private practice in Arizona and then only 3 years in the Nixon administration before being nominated to the Court).
I also find Will's complete and total deference to constitutional scholarship unsettling. Yes, we want talented, high-caliber appointments to the Court which represents, we should remind ourselves, a co-equal branch of government. It's not at all convincing to say, if you follow Will's logic, that a court made up of nine of the country's most eminent, ivy-league pedigreed constitutional scholars is going to be any better for America than a Court composed of justices who have demonstrable talent of varying legal backgrounds and perspectives. And it is undeniable that Harriet Miers is an accomplished lawyer.
So where does all this leave us? I suspect most Republicans and conservatives will become more comfortable with Miers as we move forward and most Democrats, including Harry Reid, are going to find themselves with an increasing urge to sink her nomination.
One way of doing that is to attack her religious convictions and to imply they make her unfit to serve. This is a very perilous strategy. The other way for the Democrats to derail Miers is to argue that she is unqualified due to a lack of experience and/or intellectual-horsepower. Still a tough case for the Democrats, in my opinion, though certainly a lot easier to make when conservatives are already out there doing it for them.
fortunately that little rule is written right into the constitution isn't it.
for years it has been used as a way to get non-God fearing justices, now it is time to use the same constitutional edict to turn the tables.
(hoping)
maybe... ;)
Id sleep like a baby at night with a couple more Scalia and Thomas clones on the court.
At least not for the foreseeable future.
The one thing this process has actually done, believe it or not, is make me look more favorably upon a potential Giuliani presidential candidacy.
Oh, excellent quote. That is so on the money. Can't wait for the hearings--I believe W has snookered them once again.
I do believe what? In gnomes and fairies?
"she has run a business"
is going to make a huge difference to millions of Americans trying to do the same... even liberals.
it is very difficult to keep ever rule, regulation, and tax in line trying to run a small business or be self employed.
lawmakers get this to some degree with things like the FEC but no where near the impact of the rules they've place on us.
I like Rice, but I'm not she is ready to run for president, or would even want the job, in 2008.
Imagine Borking this lady based on her faith. What will the RATS do? Obviously she is very pro life.
This article is a lot of wishful thinking. It seems that George Bush puts conservatives in this position a lot, where we bend over backwards to rationalize how his seemingly crappy decisions are actually secretly brilliant.
Show ads with her dressed up like someone's maiden aunt, teaching Sunday School and baking cookies, oh wait, that's what she does in real life. The RATS are Skrewed.
Give it time the RAT's puppet masters haven't come out with their talking points yet. They should be ready by the Sunday shows.
One of the problems with an elitist court is sooner or later they will convice themselves that they know how to run the country. Better to have smart people who know the place of the court within the three branches of government. I don't want people re-writing the laws or thinking they can learn something about the US constitution from the europeans. I want someone who says "it's not in here, there is no way it could be interpreted as being in here therefore it is not a federal matter".
You stole my objections! LOL.
The evidence is that she has been the managing partner of a very large law firm.
She should be able to take this group of eggheads in hand with out too much trouble.
You don't have to be defensive with the old curmudgeon.
BTW ~ sniveling and snivelling are both appropriate ~ being succinct by nature I prefer sniveling. ;)
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill.
To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence."
~ Sun Tzu ~
You are terrible!
At some point, people are going to catch on that President Bush's schtick works for him...
Presidency of George W. Bush -- the first 48 months
|
![]() President Bush signing a federal ban on Partial Birth Abortion
|
U.S. Forces In Baghdad
Broke the Chinese Yuan to Dollar currency peg
CAFTA - President Bush signing CAFTA
Bolton to the UN
Has CONSTRUCTION in process on the second group of eight ABM silos in Alaska and California so that America has a land-based defense (in addition to our sea-based SM-3 and AEGIS systems) of 18 ABM's against North Korean nukes (note: China itself currently only has 24 -out of several hundred- nuclear ICBM's capable of reaching the U.S.)
Energy Bill (new tax cuts...after 5 years of opposition)
Immunity For Gun Manufacturers From Crime-Related Lawsuits
5% unemployment
3.4% annual (after inflation, 5.5% actual) reported GDP Growth
Syrian Troops forced to withdraw from Lebanon
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/07/933f746d-c5d8-491a-bd7c-566de1b66135.html Russians Troops Peacefully Withdraw From Georgia
Disarmed North Korea's Nuclear Weapons Program
Why should they, when some on the right are doing it for them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.