So depressing (CATS: HOW ARE YOU GEBRICMEN !!)

[ab army of won]

Take a look at these polling numbers of the gebric congressional voting preference:

Newsweek:

Democrats 50 GOP 38

Pew:

Democrats 52 GOP 40

Fox News:

Democrats 38 GOP 35

Not even Fox News could manufactire a GOP lead. Is there any way the Democrats won't take back Congress? I don't see how.

Do you think we can protest the Democratic government or something?

[WinOne4TheGipper]

Ahh, poor troll is going to be soooooooooo disappointed.

[Ladysmith]

WOOHOO!!

ZOT!!!

[Dog Gone]

[Pipe Dog]

[Rebelbase]

If my parents had raised me based on wanting high poll ratings from myself and siblings we would have turned out like you and your liberal ilk.

[Spruce]

In Before Zod!

[manic4organic]

Heh heh.

[Siouxz]

Am I logged on?

[HoustonCurmudgeon]

I will try to explain this to you before you are zotted.

1) This type poll is crap.

2) You are a troll.

3) People are always mad at Congress and think they are doing a bad job. That however does NOT relate to their congressman who they think is doing a good to great job.

4)If you intend to run with the big dogs, get a clue first.

[ShandaLear]

Yup, it's interesting how all these stories that seemed to be deep alseep are starting to rear their little heads again.

[Cicero]

Having troubing manufactiring your message?

[LikeLight]

Funny little troll.

[Knitting A Conundrum]

for your information/amusement/sniffing/playing/paving...

[txroadkill]

[hombre_sincero]

There are a LOT of DUmmies on FR that signed on in mass around the LAST elections.

I can read a post - then check on the sign on date - and voila! All the more 'liberal minded' replies are submitted by those who joined right around the LAST presidential elections when J F'n Kerry was decimated by the truth from here.

I would almost venture to say, there is about 20% of all posts since have been by leftist infiltrators.

< snip >

...C. Gradual revolution through infiltration & subversion by revolutionaries
......1. Infiltrate the State: elective & appointed office; judgeships
......2. Infiltrate the military: enlist & subvert from within
......3. Infiltrate justice: undermine and discredit state constitutions
......4. Infiltrate education: professors & administrators
......5. Infiltrate & discredit religion: scoundrels as clergymen
......6. Register, then license, then confiscate all privately held weapons

...D. Form or infiltrate international organizations to promote goals such as "global understanding," "economic development," "transfer of resources"

< snip >

Antonio Gramsci.

[manwiththehands]

[Paul_Denton]

YOU SHALL PAY FOR YOUR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE!

[dynachrome]

It is still moving. Play with it some more

[Ladysmith]

[Wombat101]

Good rule of thumb:

Automatically assume that 40% (on both ends of the spectrum)of the population will vote republican or democrat reliably. This means that 20% of the population is up for grabs at any given time.

Assume that this 20% is genuinely uninterested in politics and the political process and will merely react to events and policies that directly affect their lives and can be expected to effect their votes. This is the 20% that is normally classified as "swing voters".

The process of election, then, breaks down to being able to either affect events or implement policies so that you can grab the attention of as many of the disinterested as possible, at a key moment (within a few days of election day). To this group, perception is everything.

And that's how elections are won and lost in America: by catering to the least interested and philosophically-motivated amongst us.

A sad commentary.

And a reason to never believe poll numbers, regardless of the source.