Posted on 09/30/2005 9:02:28 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
"Shell shocked," "confused," "stumbling," "full of doubt." These are all words I have heard used to describe the current White House effort to find Sandra Day O'Connor's replacement. Batchelder, Williams, and Owen have all been interviewed, but the process continues to sputter along. Several have told me not to buy into the Miers trial balloon. It is, I'm told, just that -- a trial balloon. Another tells me, "The President wants Gonzales. That's what is dragging this thing out. They're sending out people to say he is conservative as if by telling us that enough we will say, 'sure, he really is one of us.' That is not going to happen."
The process is still moving. Those I have talked to in the past twenty-four hours tell me we should expect a minority or woman. The odds are that it will be a woman. Sykes's name has gotten little play in the past twenty-four hours and Luttig's name has gotten none. Larry Thompson's name continues to surface. One person disputes all my sources and tells me that Thompson, not Clement, was the almost pick last time.
The jury is still out on the nominee. Says one from a phone call this morning, "The White House has gone into second guess mode. They want another Roberts, an enigma who will slip through and turn out to be a conservative. They are second guessing their picks. That, I would think, increases the chances of a Thompson or a Gonzales -- someone the President's gut tells him is conservative. My gut tells me we have to keep the pressure on or we're [screwed]."
Just as I was finishing, a friend close to the White House called to say that we may hear an announcement soon. My own suspicion is that we may see the White House attempt to take attention away from Judith Miller's testimony by making an announcement. If it is rushed, I think we will wind up with a Gonzales, a Miers, or a Thompson.
The situation is fluid, very fluid. The White House source does say that Batchelder and Williams are in play.
It'll be Gonzales. I'm resigned to that. He is a close friend of W, and he is nothing if not loyal, to his friends........
Roberts was a great pick....I am not worried.
This directly contradicts the story that Roberts had been vetted and groomed by the White House to replace Rehnquist many months ago. They were simply caught off-guard when O'Connor retired first.
Darn. I'm still holdin' out for JRB.
Hopefully Gonzales will be good on the court, if it comes to that. However, there will certainly be a huge battle over his confirmation.
And if he leaves Justice, who will the new AG be? That will be another brouhaha.
I'm against choosing on the basis of gender. I hope President Bush withstands the pressure.
Personally, I want Janice Rodgers Brown.
Randy Moss.
Most people are going to spend the first few hours after the announcement trying to figure out what kind of track record the nominee has, and the media will spend days talking about how "surprised" everyone was about the nomination.
I don't think there was a single prominent media source out there who correctly predicted that John Roberts would be named to succeed O'Connor.
Gonzales would probably be easier to confirm than most would think.................Fear of Latino backlash is the key.........
"Shell shocked," "confused," "stumbling," "full of doubt."
Sounds like redstate.org.
Please. The President doesn't second guess his decisions. Anyone that states otherwise doesn't know the man. He has his name, no one else knows who it is. Certainly not redstate.org.
Wish he would nominate Buckhead.
I don't think gender will be an issue on this one. He has well-qualified--very well-qualifed--people from whom to chose from both genders.
Me too, but I think the powers that be are going to Latino......:^(
Can I be your clerk? Or atleast gavel warmer?
Forgot to PING you on that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.