Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Same-Sex Marriage to “Usher in Era of Intolerance and Discrimination Never Seen Before” Calg. Bishop
LifeSite ^ | September 29, 2005

Posted on 09/29/2005 1:52:37 PM PDT by NYer

CALGARY, September 29, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Calgary’s Bishop Fred Henry has come out swinging again, this time warning that the normalization of same-sex “marriage” will “usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before.”

In a pastoral letter published in the Calgary Sun on September 11, Bishop Henry warned that “Same-sex marriage proponents use the language of openness, tolerance and diversity, yet the foreseeable effect of their success will be to usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before.”

He warned that same-sex “marriage” and relations will be considered the norm, and that any school, for example, that fails to incorporate homosexual relations into their curricula, will be deemed discriminatory. “The impact of the social re-engineering is bound to filter down to school classrooms,” he wrote. “The educational impact of laws on attitudes is undeniable. Ordinary words such as ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ will be replaced by ‘partner’ and ‘spouse.’ Children will have to be taught about homosexual acts. Every person and every religion that disagrees will be labelled as bigoted and openly discriminated against and dragged before Human Rights Commissions. Parents who complain will be branded as homophobes and their children will suffer.”

The bishop illustrates his point with the example of a same-sex BC couple who initiated a human rights suit alleging that their provincial ministry of education does not adequately “address issues of sexual orientation,” claiming that “there is systemic discrimination through omission and suppression of queer issues in the whole of the curriculum.” The complainants want the so-called queer studies to be mandatory, stripping parents of the right to pull children from the offending classes.

“Traditionally only those matters on which there was a large measure of consensus in society would be taught in the public school system,” Bishop Henry explained. “The rest was left to the home, to the church or to other institutions. The adoption of a new constitutional norm means that, in respect of homosexuality at least, this strategy is to be abandoned and students are to be confronted on the issues.”

Bishop Henry adds the example of Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, where the Supreme Court refused a school board’s attempt to deny use of a kindergarten text that included positive portrayals of same-sex families. “The refusal was on the basis that a significant number of parents and others in the school district would consider them to be incompatible or inconsistent with their moral and religious beliefs on same-sex relationships,” the bishop explained. “The case marked a significant moment in the debate about parental rights in education.”

BC Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin wrote in her opinion, “Parental views, however, important, cannot override the imperative placed upon the British Columbia public schools to mirror the diversity of the community and teach tolerance and understanding of difference.”

Read the bishop’s letter in its entirety at:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/sep/050929a.html

See also
“Man and Woman”, “Wife”, “Husband”, “Widow”, “Widower” Banished From all Ontario Law
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/feb/05022511.html


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: canada; culturewar; downourthroats; freedomofreligion; gaymarriage; gayunions; homosexual; homosexualagenda; inourfaces; pc; politicalcorrectness; politicallycorrect; samesexmarriage; sexualizingchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Bishop Frederick Henry
1 posted on 09/29/2005 1:52:39 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; ...
Catholic Ping - Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 09/29/2005 1:53:40 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I hope Canada's Catholic's put up a good fight. Bishop Henry is a brave man.


3 posted on 09/29/2005 1:55:53 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Its a good thing Bishop Henry is not a nominee for the SCOTUS. He would be labelled as an "out of the mainstream, hard right homophobe".


4 posted on 09/29/2005 1:56:53 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (All I want for tomorrow is to make it better than today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Fight it Bishop Henry!


5 posted on 09/29/2005 1:58:43 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
“Parental views, however, important, cannot override the imperative placed upon the British Columbia public schools to mirror the diversity of the community and teach tolerance and understanding of difference.”

Yeah right, Canadian democracy can no longer permit independant thought. Government indoctrination programs must be given the force of law.

6 posted on 09/29/2005 1:59:47 PM PDT by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Obviously the man is guilty of hate speech under Canadian law, wonder when they arrest him?


7 posted on 09/29/2005 2:00:43 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

He's probably going to be arrested for a hate crime. You can't say that about gays up there.


8 posted on 09/29/2005 2:00:50 PM PDT by Crazieman (6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
BC Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin wrote in her opinion, “Parental views, however, important, cannot override the imperative placed upon the British Columbia public schools to mirror the diversity of the community and teach tolerance and understanding of difference.”

TRANSLATION: "You will think our way or you won't think at all".

9 posted on 09/29/2005 2:02:20 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I must say im very proud of Catholics in Spain, Canada and the Holy Father for saying it how it is. Viva Il Papa!


10 posted on 09/29/2005 2:02:43 PM PDT by HHKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer; saradippity

Prayers for the Catholics of Canada. They have a good man in Bishop Frederick Henry!


11 posted on 09/29/2005 2:35:44 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Good for him. Brave man!


12 posted on 09/29/2005 2:36:41 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past ("Let the wicked man forsake his way and the evil man his thoughts. Let him turn to the Lord" Is 55:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

You know, I used to scoff at pervs who accused normal people of wanting to round them up and put them in concentration camps.

Now I wonder if it wasn't just that they knew they were going to get obnoxious enough that people would want to.


13 posted on 09/29/2005 2:40:24 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
“Same-sex marriage proponents use the language of openness, tolerance and diversity, yet the foreseeable effect of their success will be to usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before.”

Bears repeating and reprinting! There are also clear precedents for this, but it's become politically incorrect to cite them even here.

14 posted on 09/29/2005 2:41:08 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"The complainants want the so-called queer studies to be mandatory, stripping parents of the right to pull children from the offending classes."

40 years ago when I was a teenager there were "Chicken-Hawks" that preyed on teenage boys -- first with gifts and favors -- and then tried to convert/rape teenage boys.

Today they are called "Gay Activists" pushing the same Chicken-Hawk agenda. Things haven't changed too much in 40 years.


15 posted on 09/29/2005 2:47:58 PM PDT by BeAllYouCanBe (No French Person Was Injured In The Writing Of This Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
In a pastoral letter published in the Calgary Sun on September 11, Bishop Henry warned that “Same-sex marriage proponents use the language of openness, tolerance and diversity, yet the foreseeable effect of their success will be to usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before.”

The PC movement has already done this to a great degree, and this will just make it worse.

"This is intolerable!"


16 posted on 09/29/2005 3:02:35 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I am about to lose it. How much of the population do the fags and lesbos make up? The way things are going in that God-forsaken country I would thinkg it would be over 50%. Just unbelievable.

I realize I should be more Christian in my discussion of these perverts, but this in-your-face crap is getting really old, really quick


17 posted on 09/29/2005 3:14:25 PM PDT by SaintDismas (Jest becuz you put yer boots in the oven, don't make it bread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
On a related note, did anyone else happen to catch what the esteemed Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler said when a Conservative presented a private members bill to raise the age of sexual consent to 16 for its current 14? He said something to the effect that 'boosting the age of consent would result in scores of innocent teens being convicted - it would be the end of puppy love as we know it'. By the way, the age of consent for boys being in a relationship of any type where anal sex is involved is 18 - instituted to protect boys against perverted homo sexual predators. Now there is a move afoot to reduce that age to 14 as well - all things have to be equal when homo and hetero are given equal moral and legal status, yuh know.
18 posted on 09/29/2005 3:19:48 PM PDT by Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Ping!


19 posted on 09/29/2005 3:38:01 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Political correctness has no fangs if it cannot stifle dissent with threat of legal action.

The despots have already decided all of the issues, we are only postponing the inevitable. Unless we are willing to rout them from our educational centers, courts, and political offices.


20 posted on 09/29/2005 4:26:04 PM PDT by weegee (The lesson from New Orleans? Smart Growth kills. You can't evacuate dense populations easily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson