:-)
Posted on 09/28/2005 8:42:11 AM PDT by Valin
Reuters is anti-American.
What do you call 66 Reuters journalists killed in a war zone crossfire?
A nice start.
Reuters has it backward: reporters have obstructed fighting in Iraq.
Considering how these jackasses have been misreporting the war and all, we can hardly blame the troops if their aim is off a little bit sometimes.
If I were king, Reuters wouldn't have a reporter within 1,000 miles of Iraq. This organization long ago forfeited any moral right to complain about the quality of the information being disseminated about the war or the American effort in Iraq.
Reuters - just another way to say Al Jazeera.
Guys, this is a war. Remember WWII? You went where you were told to go, and were grateful for the access. If you got your @$$ shot off, well, people die in war. You looked the other way when Kennedy was "dating" women in the White House, you did the same for Bubba (a president with even less to recommend him special treatment), and you ignored a crippled FDR because it would hurt the war effort. But a Republican is President now, and gee, you want to front page every little blip!
Please, STFU or get out.
I trust the US military a lot more than any so called "journalist" especially one from Reuters.
Perhaps one of the most dangerous jobs in Iraq is manning a checkpoint. If you approach it quickly and don't pay strict attention to the troopers you WILL BE SHOT. The first round is often a 50 cal burst into the grill. If you don't stop the second burst is into the windshield. The idea is to kill the terrorists before they can get close enough to detonate a car bomb at the check point. There are signs everywhere that say DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED. If you can't obey the signs expect gunfire. I'd rather lose the occasional journalist than see our soldiers getting blown up because they hog tied by political correctness. I'd like to see one of these cretins stand at a checkpoint, wearing body armor in 120 degrees, while worrying if the next car is going to vaporize them.
Cindy and croonies are harming our Troops. They are aiding the enemy with their hate of America.
God Be with our TROOPS and President.
AT LAST, an interesting question from Reuters:
How do we distinguish between people whom Reuters chooses to anoint as "professional journalists" and "insurgents"?
Hmmmmmmm.....
OK, I give up. I just don't see any difference.
I suspect their aim is not all that "off."
I remember this 1960's krap..I've often wondered what I would have done if the me "then" was the me of "now"..
Does anyone else wish to make up for being just a teen-ager, or a mislead young adult? SPEAK OUT!
We the People need to start demanding that traitors be silenced....this is not a freedom of speech issue. We can not allow the hateful anti-USA leftist get a stronghold..their foothold is already established.
"I'd rather lose the occasional journalist than see our soldiers getting blown up because they hog tied by political correctness."
Ditto to that!
Want to safeguard your "journalists?" Here's a tip: Stop hiring terrorists and stop embedding with the enemy.
First of all, I'd like a ruling on all of this. Is this simply Reuter's opinion, or is it fact?!
Secondly, hey, when you decide to stick yourself in a war between terrorists and the US Military, let's just say that you are either fully understanding of the risks or should be a nominee for a Darwin award!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.