Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather: Bush Guard Memo Story "Accurate," Never Proven Not So
http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2005/cyb20050927.asp#1 ^

Posted on 09/27/2005 5:10:42 PM PDT by NCjim

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: NCjim
Holy moly! When he's without a script to read, Rather certainly can blather. In all that drivel, there's hardly a coherent thought or grammatically proper sentence to be found.

Not to mention that he's a pompous, self-righteous blowhard: "There are bloggers who have as much integrity as I, or the most integrity-filled people I know have..." (implied, "I am the most integrity-filled person I know, so my opinion should reign as fact"). What a maroon.

Funny how he keeps trying to defend the indefensible. I like Rand Simberg's observations as Mary Mapes tried to defend the authenticity of the fake memos: "My irony meter just shattered the glass, and bent its needle into a pretzel."

41 posted on 09/27/2005 5:42:20 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Stop taxing me to support NPR and PBS. Why not just broadcast WIRAQ?


42 posted on 09/27/2005 5:42:34 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

It is true because Dan Rather says it is true!
It is true because Dan Rather wants it to be true.


43 posted on 09/27/2005 5:44:27 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: Izzy Dunne

In most cases I feel sympathy and compassion for a person showing signs of dementia but in this case I'll make an exception. This guy is a LOSER big time and an idiot to boot.


45 posted on 09/27/2005 5:55:42 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

This is the e-mail I sent buttboy Kalb...




You made a lot of glaring errors in your interview with Dan Rather.

Is this the level of accuracy that you teach your students?

Or is accuracy not as important as the message?


46 posted on 09/27/2005 5:57:45 PM PDT by rollinginmybuggy (The Electric Amish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
One supporting pillar of the story, albeit an important one, one supporting pillar was brought into question.

Nice try Dan.
Without the phony memos what you had was 5 years worth of trying to catch a puff of smoke.Nothing.
It was the story and it was fake.That makes the story fake.
To continue with this charade that the story has not been proven wrong does prove one thing,that Dan is a corrupt,dishonest,wreck of a man.

47 posted on 09/27/2005 5:58:51 PM PDT by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

So does Mapes:

http://iraqnow.blogspot.com/2005/09/mary-mapes-has-book-coming-out.html


48 posted on 09/27/2005 6:08:05 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Sure, Dan. Explain this away.
49 posted on 09/27/2005 6:08:26 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
"they understood that what we reported as the central facts of the story and there were new insights into the President's, were correct and to this day, by the way have not been denied which is always the test of whether,"

No, Dan, that was the Clinton White House "test of whether" - how quickly Mike McCurry could get out there with an aggresive denial. What the Bush White House was practicing with regard to your fairy tale was the refusal to dignify a scurrilous charge with a response, a gentlemanly form of behavior that you would do well to study in your dotage. ;)

50 posted on 09/27/2005 6:13:35 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Speaking several languages is an asset; keeping your mouth shut in one is priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
OK Dan, the story is true; so what?? Nobody cared anyway except a few whackos in the Stone Age Press. You think that what he did or didn't do when he was 20 something makes any difference whatsoever??? Go get a life you disgrace to your "profession".

Pray for W and Our Feedom Fighters

51 posted on 09/27/2005 6:17:39 PM PDT by bray (Pray for the Freedom of the Iraqis from Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

"And never more than what this last year has said to me that the public at large did not, as you put it, 'feast' on us. The public at large, they got it. They knew exactly what happened."

I love this part. Rather continues to look through the wrong end of the telescope. The public "got it" all right, Dan, and that's why CBS's ratings, never very high, dropped like a rock, you had to "retire," and Pres. Bush's National Guard service never, ever came up again.


52 posted on 09/27/2005 6:19:48 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

A friend just sent me this link to a hilarious Rather "Guard Memo" parody:

http://www.joking.com/videos.asp?video=rather.swf


53 posted on 09/27/2005 6:21:14 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
Why can't these people just enjoy their zillions of dollars quitely and envision their irrelevance however they like....but in silence?

Were I Rather, Streisand, Redford, Midler, Belafonte or any of dozens of other over-the-hills, I think I might learn to also retire my damned ego, become unrecognized and either vacation quietly and anonymously at fabulous resorts or maybe - just maybe - walk quietly amongst the 'little people' they apparently scorn.

54 posted on 09/27/2005 6:24:26 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Cindy, ya shoulda stuck with "offshore drilling" as your cause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite are homosexual lovers. Unless Dan can prove me wrong, it's true.


55 posted on 09/27/2005 6:28:43 PM PDT by freedomcrusader (Proudly wearing the politically incorrect label "crusader" since 1/29/2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Why can't these people just enjoy their zillions of dollars quitely and envision their irrelevance however they like....but in silence?

For the same reason that the Bent One can't keep his mouth shut - they can't stand the fact that they are no longer relevant.

56 posted on 09/27/2005 6:32:41 PM PDT by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

When I was young, I wanted to be famous...which is a young person's misplaced belief that to be famous is to be loved and respected. Now, I just want to be rich, which is an old person's misplaced search for stability and predictability.

The people you mentioned had the fame and the money early...so they never grew up and still want to be loved and respected. There are lots of celebrities who have quietly gone on their way...even leftist ones. But every single one of them were grown ups. Johnny Carson comes to mind. Kathrine Hepburn comes to mind. There are lots more.

IMO, that is the difference.


57 posted on 09/27/2005 6:33:14 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I've come to believe that exposure to TV cameras makes you crazy (correlation proves causation!). Examples:
1. Dan Rather
2. Cindy Sheehan
3. Joe Scarborough
4. Bill O'Reilly


58 posted on 09/27/2005 6:33:59 PM PDT by etcetera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Let's face it. The bitter old fool will never admit that he was on a crusade to do to President Bush what he claims he did to Nixon.

The best thing that could happen to CBS now that Blather is being shoved off into the sunset is for Perky Katie Couric to get evening news anchor job. That would kill the news department and free up the time for something that would bring in a little revenue.


59 posted on 09/27/2005 6:36:21 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

What an imbecile.


60 posted on 09/27/2005 6:39:58 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson