Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Positions on the Environment (Vanity)

Posted on 09/23/2005 8:36:54 PM PDT by maui_hawaii

Everyone knows republicans get hammered on the environment in every single election cycle...

I just thought it would be interesting to hear freeper opinions about it.

On one thread I made the following post:

Now that I think about it many surfers are environmentally friendly...if that says anything. They want to protect the ocean.

Me, I think thats a legit thing to do.

If you see what washes up on the shores of Hawaii sometimes you will think people shouldn't litter the oceans either...

If your neighbors threw all their garbage in your yard you would have a fit...

Not to mention that if you are a sportsman (hunter/fisherman etc) you want to protect what you do right? Its in the self interest of the sportsmen (and even some industries) to protect the enviroment and to manage game. Given I am no kook about it, but I think it needs to be done. Otherwise my grandbabies will never have the thrill of catching a nice fish or shooting bambi.

Its just in Hawaii the ocean is in your face, and in Nebraska and 90% of America, its not close enough to home to worry about. The average joe doesn't see it...

Anyway I just thought this is as good of time as any to hear everyone's two cents on something conservatives get hammered on all the time...

I guess my position is that hunters, fishermen, the tourism industry, and basic citizens have a vested interest in protecting the environment to some extent.

While I am no tree hugger and I think bambi taste good fried...I think there needs to be a common sense approach to protecting the environment.

What if you are a bass fisherman but you go to the lake and see all the fish floating belly up? It happened down the road from where I am... someone poured their excess chemicals in the river and viola... no more fish.

We talk about gun rights all the time here...but what about this? Doves, quail, deer, rabbits, etc are going to have to live somewhere...

Add your two cents. I think it will be interesting...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: wagglebee

As a side note, volcanoes spew out more greenhouse gases than all of our cars and coal plants. We haven't gotten Venus' atmosphere yet, so that must mean the Earth is tougher than environmentalists think.

Their radicalism makes true environmentalists look bad.


21 posted on 09/23/2005 8:53:49 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (We DARE Defend Our Rights [Alabama State Motto])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig
LoL!!!!!!

I think catching one would be a pain... and he might bite you in the @ss....

22 posted on 09/23/2005 8:54:09 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Earth First! Make Mars Our Bitch!


23 posted on 09/23/2005 8:54:35 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
People sue each other too damn much.

Hence the last sentence of my post.

24 posted on 09/23/2005 8:54:44 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Excellent post.


25 posted on 09/23/2005 8:55:35 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
The so-called scientists and self-serving enviormentalists claimed that Prince William Sound in Alaska would never support wildlife after the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in 1989. It only took a few years for the area to recover.
26 posted on 09/23/2005 8:57:00 PM PDT by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

My position is simple: The government only needs to act when property rights clash, and where the act is either grossly negligent or malicious.

Intentionally dumping harmful (and really harmful, not just 'it upsets environmentalists' harmful) chemicals into a public waterway? Yes, the government needs to act.

Private businesses being fined for 'runoff' - which is nothing more than rain water running off their property and into rivers and streams? Assinine, and the government should get a grip on itself.

The sad fact is government is often the biggest polluter, and nothing is done, because they're the government.

Now, if you own 100 acres of pristine forest and wetlands, and you want to cut down every damn tree and pave it all with cement, that should be your right, too. The government should not be able to come in and control what you do with your property just because a few square yards have standing water once every three years and they decided to call it a 'wetland'.


27 posted on 09/23/2005 9:00:49 PM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
Here is a question for you...

I agree whole heartedly about the resilience of the environment...

BUT what IF we could use technology to burn cleaner and run cheaper than at present?

In the long term I mean...

We could come up with a whole lot more efficient ways of energy management and in the process create a whole new industry...and our national security situation could change drastically....

Thats not against conservatism... thats just using technology.

Their radicalism makes true environmentalists look bad.

BAM! You nailed it.

28 posted on 09/23/2005 9:01:19 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Many Freepers are Outdoor Sportsmen and as such have a keen desire to keep the waters clean and animal habitat available so they can enjoy the outdoors with their children and grandchildren.

However, most freepers would object to closing off lands merely for the purposes of preserving marginal species and subspecies.

It has always been my opinion that land should be open for recreational purposes and oil and mineral exploitation. However whoever uses the land must leave it as they found it.

As to environmental subjects such as global warming and sustainability, I have always believed that the world has been here a lot of years, many bigger and fiercer critters than I have come and gone and the world is better for their having been here. The earth is a forgiving planet and she will forgive man's transgressions as well.
29 posted on 09/23/2005 9:04:41 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

i say pave it all, that way we don't have to worry about those pesky trees growing up through the sidewalks and pavement. picture it, sea to shining sea of nothing but beautiful pavement. mmmm....pavement...


30 posted on 09/23/2005 9:07:30 PM PDT by Andonius_99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

EARTH: Use it up...move on.


31 posted on 09/23/2005 9:09:20 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

or a plastic bag...they're easier to catch, too.


32 posted on 09/23/2005 9:09:39 PM PDT by Andonius_99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

I admit it, I don't think about this very much! I think the earth can sort of take care of herself. I don't go around deliberately destroying anything, and I don't litter etc. But I think the earth people are mostly wackos.


33 posted on 09/23/2005 9:09:50 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Why ask for two cents when you can get thirty bucks worth?

See tagline.

34 posted on 09/23/2005 9:11:44 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

I don't think you want me to get started on this subject. Our trees are dying from Bark Beetle, not so much from the drought as from environmentalism -- environmentalists (Sierra Club) don't want to stop illegal immigration into the Southwest, but they DO want to tear down all out dams so the river runners can have a free flowing river all the way to the sea... that is a warmup!


35 posted on 09/23/2005 9:13:21 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
I truly believe the leftist environmentalists aren't really interested in ecology. They are more interested in reducing our nation's economic power. Kyoto, ANWAR, etc. I think they go to bed each night and pray that our nation will collapse.

I on the other hand am concerned about my land and I would never pollute it or abuse it knowingly. My farm will be my children's someday. It is in my best interest to keep it healthy.

36 posted on 09/23/2005 9:13:49 PM PDT by Aznar5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
However, most freepers would object to closing off lands merely for the purposes of preserving marginal species and subspecies.

Exactly. Most conservatives are also conservationists, but our definition of conservation does not preclude responsible use.

Yet the watermellons (green on outside red on inside) think the only solution is to lock it up, exclude people all together (or only allow their own tree-hugger walking tours).

We see this in Alaska all the time. Down south whackos come up here and attempt to exclude all use (except their own) of vast tracts of land. Of course they all run little wilderness tour companies, charging huge fees to take people from Chicago (etc.) on enviro-tours while excluding hunters, camper, fisherman, and snowmobilers.

37 posted on 09/23/2005 9:13:52 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Earth First! Make Mars Our Bitch!

This is why the President is correct in kicking NASA into new directions.

The cost?

Just think of all our tax resources wasted every year defending some godless ACLU lawsuit or some inane environazi lawsuit. I shudder to think the figure could be in the billions of dollars. Billions of dollars that could be diverted to space exploration or technological advancement

The left and among them the ACLU and Environazis are the real danger to our survival on this planet.

38 posted on 09/23/2005 9:15:25 PM PDT by A message (The Democrat party platform is NOT in the mainstream. It is just foolish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
I'm very pro-renewable energy to the extent it is cost-effectively developed and operated. Most modern day "environmentalists" care more about undermining capitalism than protecting the environment: socialism masquerading as a tree. For example, my earlier post on Enviro-whackos vs. Limousine Liberals.
39 posted on 09/23/2005 9:15:51 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andonius_99

A bit of a Perelandra preview, huh ? :)


40 posted on 09/23/2005 9:18:35 PM PDT by A message (The Democrat party platform is NOT in the mainstream. It is just foolish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson