Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stealth Homosexual 'Hate Crimes' Bill Passes House Of Representatives
TraditionalValuesCoalition ^ | September 22, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 09/22/2005 7:54:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

While the nation's attention was focused on the Judge John Roberts confirmation hearing, pro-homosexual forces in the U.S. House of Representatives snuck through a pro-homosexual hate crimes bill by adding it to legislation designed to protect children from sexual predators.

...Pro-family groups had no prior notice that this was happening.

...We are urging you to contact your two U.S. Senators and ask that they oppose the inclusion of any hate crime language to this legislation. Capitol Hill switchboard number is 202-224-3121...

...the new hate crimes law will add "sexual orientation," "gender," and "gender identity" to federally protected categories. "Gender Identity" is code for transgenders (individuals who think they are the opposite sex, cross-dressers, or drag queens.)

If passed, this legislation will provide protection for homosexual behavior, placing anal intercourse on a par with race or religion. It will also be used to normalize drag queens, cross-dressers, transsexuals, and she/males (individuals who choose to remain female from the waist up and male from the waist down with the help of hormones.)

This legislation will "federalize" every crime involving homosexuals and so-called trangendered individuals.

...This bill will also deny individuals equal justice under law. An individual who commits a crime against an elderly woman will get a less serious prison sentence than if the victim is a cross-dresser or homosexual. This is unfair and denies all individuals equal protection under law.

...Every crime is an expression of hate against an individual. There is no such thing as a "love" crime of violence. Liberals call these "hate crimes," but what they really want to do is penalize people for their thoughts, which will ultimately prove dangerous to pastors, religious leaders, therapists, and many others....

(Excerpt) Read more at traditionalvalues.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; crimebill; donutwatch; fakehatecrimes; govwatch; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; libertarians; thoughtpolice; tvc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: trubluolyguy

Do we all know about it?


21 posted on 09/22/2005 9:39:19 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Freep the GOP Reps who voted "aye" on special rights for gays
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1484995/posts?page=67#67


22 posted on 09/22/2005 9:47:01 AM PDT by Coleus (What was Ted Kennedy and his nephew doing on Good Friday in 1991? Getting Drunk and Raping Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Do we all know about it?




Sorry, all those paying attention know about it.


There, that's better.


23 posted on 09/22/2005 10:01:06 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over ideology!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

In regards to our last debate about the murdered transvestite:

Looks like your soluton of punching the guy in the nose will now become a federal crime.

Now these perverts will basically get a free pass to trick drunken men into sodomy.




24 posted on 09/22/2005 10:11:18 AM PDT by bummerdude (Boycott Chevron-Texaco, buy Exxon-Mobil !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; aristeides; Askel5; ...

Get a load of this. Slimy Republicans strike again!


25 posted on 09/22/2005 10:29:56 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Looks like the LBJ/FDR view of the Commerce Clause is at work:

U.S. House backs hate crime measure protecting gays

SEC. 602. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(6) Such violence substantially affects interstate commerce in many ways, including--    

(A) by impeding the movement of members of targeted groups and forcing such members to move across State lines to escape the incidence or risk of such violence; and    

(B) by preventing members of targeted groups from purchasing goods and services, obtaining or sustaining employment, or participating in other commercial activity.    

(7) Perpetrators cross State lines to commit such violence.

(8) Channels, facilities, and instrumentalities of interstate commerce are used to facilitate the commission of such violence.

(9) Such violence is committed using articles that have traveled in interstate commerce.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1484654/posts?page=137#137

(includes a list of members' votes)

26 posted on 09/22/2005 10:41:54 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Congress can only regulate the commerce itself, not all the things that could affect it!

27 posted on 09/22/2005 10:50:54 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
That was before Wickard v. Filburn, the darling of Great Society liberals and big government pseudo-conservatives.
28 posted on 09/22/2005 11:15:50 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

bump for later


29 posted on 09/22/2005 11:21:26 AM PDT by NW Mike (Proud member of the VRWC since 1972 -- who the hell are you calling 'neo'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe; Laissez-faire capitalist

My Senators are Boxer and Feinstein.....argh!!!


30 posted on 09/22/2005 11:26:37 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Wrote Mikulski and Sarbanes on their web forms--No pro-homosexual amendments!


31 posted on 09/22/2005 11:39:34 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hey, Cindy Sheehan, grow up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Giant waste of time writing and calling senators. Didn't they pass this in the previous senate and house never took it up? If it has passed the house, it will sail through this senate. We can sit home in '06 and put the ones who voted for this out of a job, but there won't be anybody to vote for to replace them. Don't think they don't know it.


32 posted on 09/22/2005 11:45:02 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
33 posted on 09/22/2005 11:45:34 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

None of this makes sense to me - it is already illegal to kill or injure someone. I don't understand how these people think that their lives are worth more than their neighbors... This is a truly sad commentary on the world we live in.


34 posted on 09/22/2005 11:55:06 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Libs have no interest in punishing crime, only hate.


35 posted on 09/22/2005 11:59:22 AM PDT by Tabi Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tabi Katz
Libs have no interest in punishing crime, only hate.

Hate IS crime, if it's somebody ELSE'S hate.

36 posted on 09/22/2005 1:13:44 PM PDT by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

bttt


37 posted on 09/25/2005 6:31:00 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lejes Rimul
For this amendment to have passed, a bunch of Republicans had to have voted for it. I'm going to guess it wasn't a roll call vote

What I'd really like is a Constitutional amendment that all votes have to be on the record and public

38 posted on 09/25/2005 6:36:41 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Never try to teach a pig to sing -- it wastes your time and it annoys the pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson