Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Reagan Do? (Ann Coulter Laments Bush Not Being More Like The Gipper Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 09/21/05 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/21/2005 4:54:29 PM PDT by goldstategop

Perhaps President Bush has inadvertently nominated a true conservative to the court with this Roberts fellow. I remain skeptical based on the following facts:

Anita Hill has not stepped forward to accuse Roberts of sexual harassment.

The Democrats did not accuse Roberts of having a secret life as a racist.

We have no idea what kind of videos he rents.

Also, I'm still steamed that Bush has now dashed my dreams of an all-black Supreme Court composed of eight more Clarence Thomases. Incidentally, eight more Clarence Thomases is the only form of human cloning I would ever support.

As liberal Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in the New Yorker, Roberts was a scared choice. After Hurricane Katrina, Bush was even more scared. So when he had to pick a chief justice, he renominated the Rorschach blot.

For Christians, it's "What Would Jesus Do?" For Republicans, it's "What Would Reagan Do?" Bush doesn't have to be Reagan; he just has to consult his WWRD bracelet. If Bush had followed the WWRD guidelines, he would have nominated Antonin Scalia for the chief justiceship.

As proof, I refer you to the evidence. When Reagan had an opening for chief justice, he nominated Associate Justice William Rehnquist. While liberals were preoccupied staging die-ins against Rehnquist and accusing him of chasing black people away from the polls with a stick – something they did not accuse Roberts of – Reagan slipped Scalia onto the court.

That's what Reaganesque presidents with a five-vote margin in the Senate typically do. Apart from toppling the Soviet Empire, Scalia remains Reagan's greatest triumph.

Scalia deserved the chief justiceship. He's the best man for the job. He has suffered lo these many years with Justices Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor. He believes in a sedentary judiciary. He's for judicial passivism. Scalia also would have been the first cigar-smoking, hot-blooded Italian chief justice, which I note the diversity crowd never mentions.

But most important, if Bush had nominated Scalia, liberals would have responded with their usual understated screams of genocide, and Bush could have nominated absolutely anyone to fill Justice O'Connor's seat. He also could have cut taxes, invaded Syria, and bombed North Korea and Cuba just for laughs. He could even have done something totally nuts, like enforce the immigration laws.

Even if Roberts turns out to be another Rehnquist (too much to hope for another Scalia!), we don't know that, Bush doesn't know that, and Bush has blown a golden opportunity to make Chuck Schumer the public face of the Democratic Party. A few weeks of Schumer as their spokesman, and normal Democrats would be clamoring for Howard Dean to get back on the stick. Teddy Kennedy would start showing up at hearings actually holding a double scotch.

Inasmuch as Bush must still choose a replacement for O'Connor, it's important to remember the "Sandra Day O'Connor bylaw" to the WWRD guidelines: Never appoint anyone like Sandra Day O'Connor to any court at any level.

Reagan had made a campaign promise to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. He didn't say anything about appointing a ninny. But back in 1981, it was slim pickings for experienced female judges. O'Connor was a terrible mistake and will forever mar Reagan's record, but at least he did it only once.

Bush has already fulfilled all his campaign promises to liberals – and then some! He said he'd be a "compassionate conservative," which liberals interpreted to mean that he would bend to their will, enact massive spending programs, and be nice to liberals. When Bush won the election, that sealed the deal. It meant the Democrats won.

Consequently, Bush has enacted massive new spending programs, obstinately refused to deal with illegal immigration, opposed all conservative Republicans in their primary races, and invited Teddy Kennedy over for movie night. He's even sent his own father to socialize with aging porn star Bill Clinton.

(Sidebar on the aging porn star: Idiot Republicans fraternizing with the Clintons has not harmed the decadent buffoon's reputation abroad. A Chinese condom manufacturer recently named one of its condoms the "Clinton," a fitting tribute to the man who had Monica Lewinsky perform oral sex on him in the Oval Office on Easter Sunday. Their advertising slogans are: "Always wear a 'Clinton' when you're getting a 'Lewinsky'!"; "I still believe in a place called the G-spot"; "Extra-thin skinned!"; "For when you really, really want to feel her pain." Note to Bush: This isn't Walter Mondale. How about sending Pops on the road with Joey Buttafuoco?)

According to my WWRD wristwatch, it's time for Bush to invade Grenada, bomb Libya, fire the air traffic controllers, and joke about launching a first strike against the Soviet Union. In lieu of that, how about nominating a conservative to O'Connor's seat on the court? It would be a bold gesture.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; bush43; coulter; coulterhaslostit; democrats; johnroberts; pornstarclinton; presidentbush; reagan; ronaldreagan; thomasclones; worldnutdaily; wwrd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 761-779 next last
To: Cautor; ohioWfan
Every time I sign in on FR, the message comes up: Welcome back Cautor. Always makes me thing of the old TV show which I never once watched. BTW, who was that guy who starred in the role? Gabe something or the other?

LOL! (Meanwhile, I've been enjoying your heated exchange with ohioWfan.)

381 posted on 09/22/2005 4:36:46 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: hoboken109; nopardons
It appears you have nothing better to do than to get personal here . I'm not here to go after people as you seem to be .Im interested in the political comments and discussion . I would never be so obnoxious as to claim I know a persons age and background by looking at what they typed on a discussion board over a 10 min period.

Well said, hoboken109. Some 'Oldies' around here do not want discussion but complete, unquestioning agreement with their views and opinions about the facts. (That's all they are---OPINIONS ABOUT the facts---it seems that when an Oldie cites FACTS you MUST agree with their interpretation or they'll use their little 'in crowd' connections to get you booted out of here.)

Here's a FACT for some FR Oldies: Our country was founded by rebellious-spirited men and women who didn't believe in 'whatever the King says, goes'.

382 posted on 09/22/2005 4:54:12 AM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Yes. George Bush is akin to God for some folks who place party affiliation over conservatism. To critisize him on anything damns you to eternal hellfire and bitter personal insults from those that ought to know better. Don't believe it, check out any anti-illegal immigration thread.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Worse than that, questioning the intellectual capabilities of sean hannity now gets you labelled a treasonous assassin. Lock-step is all the craze these days.

383 posted on 09/22/2005 4:54:22 AM PDT by wtc911 (see my profile for how to contribute to a pentagon heroes fund)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

So you say. Obviously you never check your facts. And other than sign a bill Congress finally passed (something Reagan never had the chance to do) remind me of what Bush has done besides jawbone.


384 posted on 09/22/2005 5:16:24 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: carton253

"That has not been proven... "

That shows you're clueless.


385 posted on 09/22/2005 5:17:14 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: arasina

Thank you for your LOL! I get a laugh out of that too. I have been one of Bush's strongest supporters, but it seems this term has become one disaster after another. When he decided to make an apology over the Federal Katrina response, I said enough is enough. The problems in LA were all to do with incompetence by Nagin and Blanco. The Federal response was probably one of the best ever, yet Bush let the MSM get away with pinning a bum rap on him. He needs to get his administration back under control.


386 posted on 09/22/2005 5:21:44 AM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: right way right
The column is all about trying to sway Bush to nominate a conservative.

My goodness, that's all he's nominated to the judiciary, including the SC, so far.

387 posted on 09/22/2005 5:54:31 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Actually, I am a child of the 50s, but came of age in the mid 60s. Which is neither here nor there.

My point still stands. And if you weren't working so hard to be snarky, you might see it.

I did not claim there were no trolls. Try actually reading a post before you fire off a "clever" response.

FYI, FR is a place of discussion and reasoned debate of ideas. Instead of being juvenile and insulting, why don't you try posting something that falls in that category?

Good bye.
388 posted on 09/22/2005 6:13:18 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I didn't say I was a child *in* the 60s, I said child *of* the 60s. I did my diaper filling over a decade earlier. And according to my mother, I did it very well. /nod & a wink

I admit that sometimes I forget FR is not solely populated by 20 & 30 somethings.


389 posted on 09/22/2005 6:18:39 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Calm down, read a lot of factual history, and then, THEN, you'll be able to understand that some of the things you want President Bush to do, just is NOT done!

This is PERFECT advice to a lot of FReepers who are NOT young as well. Thanks.

390 posted on 09/22/2005 7:07:04 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: whizeup
Wizenheimer, you really need to read FR rules. What you're doing in posting nasties about other people without pinging them is unethical. And giving advice to others about anyone else is particularly amusing for someone who knows absolutely nothing about any of us..

A touch of reality for a boy who doesn't know that Ohio is in a different time zone than the west coast.....

(Now I understand, though......you must have had a few too many 'cold ones.' ;)

391 posted on 09/22/2005 7:10:47 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Yeah...........right. I'm a RINO. LOL!!!!!!

I'm a very conservative Republican, hoser........and depending on your age, was accutely aware of my conservatism before you could say the word.

President Bush is less conservative than I, but he is still a conservative, and to say he's not a Republican is just silly.

392 posted on 09/22/2005 7:13:39 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
You will doubtless be smiling down on my situation.

LOL! I never smile at another's despair.......I mean another FReeper that is.

I must confess to a little Schadenfreude at the angst of the left, the diminishment of their power, and their writhing in grief and screams of desperation..........much of which, not incidentally, is due to their hatred for our good, conservative President who is destroying what was left of their power.

(I think that means that we are all bad people inside, and that only through the grace of God can we be otherwise....)

393 posted on 09/22/2005 7:19:17 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
All I want is a out of life is a chance to meet a hard-core conservative woman like Ann Coulter once.

It's not like Ms. Coutlter has a great body or anything, I just like her mind (well, her body aint bad either).

She's good looking enough, but I like her mind and her writing the most.

394 posted on 09/22/2005 7:29:07 AM PDT by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carton253

Go back and reread what I posted. I didn't say we shouldn't help fight AIDS in Africa. When PresBush signed off on the $15-billion Africa AIDS package, he "partly abandoned the Mexico City policy". That policy prohibited US aid being given to international family planning organizations that provided abortion counseling and access to abortions. Good politics, bad policy. Frankly, I don't agree with throwing money at problems, domestic or foreign.


395 posted on 09/22/2005 7:46:58 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: whizeup
Doing it again, I see.

I thought you were a kid because you were acting like one. (And I could tell in two posts that hoboken was sincere because he IS).

Finding out that you're 50 makes me respect your behavior even less.

I figured from your posts that you were about 19......21 tops. And it's true that my own kids were far more mature at 13 than you. And when I found out that you're fifty.......wow! Really sad......

(Of course, you still could be lying about everything.....who knows?).

396 posted on 09/22/2005 8:26:17 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Every time I sign in on FR, the message comes up: Welcome back Cautor.

Oh, that's funny! But you're right, it says "Welcome Back ohioWfan!"........so it would say "Welcome Back Cautor!"

I watched the show off and on, but I can't remember the guy's name. It was Gabe something. I can see his face and hear his voice in my head, but can't remember his name. Such is the aging process.........

397 posted on 09/22/2005 8:29:38 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
She's hoping that he'll make up some needed brownie points by nominating another Scalia.

See now.......that's where she's wrong. She should know by now that President Bush doesn't do things to get 'brownie points.' And she knows that he's been very conservative in the judiciary.

He'll do what's right. Wait and see.

This article is a rare weak moment for Ann. But she talks alot. She'll recover from this loser......

398 posted on 09/22/2005 8:32:29 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Good morning Ohio

Are we talking about Welcome back Kotter? If so that was Gabe Kaplan
399 posted on 09/22/2005 8:34:59 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Worse than that, questioning the intellectual capabilities of sean hannity now gets you labelled a treasonous assassin. Lock-step is all the craze these days.




I don't question Shawn's intellect, I just find his show boring.

Now I'll be ducking those lock-stepping name callers! See what you started? LOL


400 posted on 09/22/2005 8:40:40 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (I am conservative. That is NOT the same thing as Republican. Don't place party over ideology!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 761-779 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson