Posted on 09/21/2005 4:54:29 PM PDT by goldstategop
Just to remind you CHILD, that this was your first post to me, completely and utterly misunderstanding the post you were responding to, and saying nasty things out of complete ignorance....
Making THIS statement.....
Try actually reading a post before you fire off a "clever" response
.......REALLY funny.
I have engaged in much serious discussion on this very thread, with respectable people with whom I differ. Have you?
And btw, I note by your tagline that you were drug or alcohol impaired during the '60's. SOME of us who were teenagers and twenty-somethings during the '60's were actually conservative and mature enough to stay away from hallucinogens and live productive, patriotic and conservative lives.
And WE are the ones that YOU are making fun of now.....
Thanks, rep!
Here! Here!
whizeup, if you don't stop this (unethical) assault behind my back, I will consult with the mods. Stop it.
Good morning to you too Professer Sunshine, sunshine, let the sunshine in...oops, bad news for you I forgot...have your blinds closed tightly and room completely dark? wouldn't want to lose an absolutely fair and balanced person...
(everything I have posted has been in the open btw.)
Ooooh, I'm shaking in my boots....
btw who are the mods. you have threatened me with for the third time?
If I misunderstood your post and over reacted, I offer my [sincere] apologies.
As far as my tagline, well, lighten up a little. I knew a surprising number of people that indulged a little that were politically conservative. I wouldn't/didn't recommend it to my kid, but, on the other hand, I am not [at all] ashamed of it either.
I asked you multiple times to ping me when you were doing so, and you refused, and continued to give a very one-sided account, which is, at the very least, misleading.
It's a matter of decency to other freepers, and you have been informed. There are too many posts and threads to assume that the one you are wrongly insulting (in this case, me) is reading it. I just happened to read your multiple misleading posts about me because I was scrolling through in my (rational) discussions with others here.
Now might I suggest that we start over? If you really are 50, you're not that much younger than I, so I would expect you would have the maturity to understand that we got off on the wrong foot, and need to wipe the slate clean.
But at the very least please ping me if you decide to insult me again so I can correct your erroneous comments?
I understand that a large group of my baby boomer peers did not have the self-discipline to control their behavior during the '60's, but your tagline is a comment that excuses it, and implies that there was something wrong with those of us who remained sober and moral.
I have never liked that..........nor have any of my many friends and family who also lived through the '60's and remember them well.
Actually.........the over indulgence of the self-absorbed baby boomers (not judging you.....I don't know you), is part of what has led to the mess we're in now with the anti-war, anti-morality, anti-personal responsibility "do whatever feels good" left.
As a conservative, I REALLY don't like what the '60's did to us as a country.
Seems to me that I have replied to everone of your insulting posts to me in the open. You have referred to me in other posts that I have read...I wrote you yesterday and said I thought it was a shame the way things had gone on because you would think basically we were on the same side.
You wrote back a very rude response,(I wrote and told you I was 50 with 13 grandchildren, you did not figure it out)in response to your earlier response that was rude to me last afternoon I offered to pray and said Amen..next thing I know later on in the evening you are attacking me and other people again...it is not fruitful and very "mean-spirited"(where have I heard that before? Does that mean I am DU? Phuuulease give me a break ...I would like once again to try to agree to disagree politely it would make for better discourse.
Btw..I am WOMAN...hear me roar?
Question: Has Ann Coulter jumped the shark? Discuss among yourselves.
Uh, because his JOB is to veto unconstitutional legislation, regardless of which party passes it.
Look, Donkey breath; I didn't say Bush was NO republican, I said he was a RINO.. all three of them(Bush's) are RINOs..
And we will not start over because you don't want to. That's fine if that's the way you like to deal with problems.
Now, moving along..........do you see the box with "To:" in it at the top when you reply to a post? Next time you talk about me to someone else and share with them how awful a person I am, add a semi-colon after the name already there, and then type in ohioWfan. That way I am informed that you are talking about me. Understand yet?
It is a FR courtesy. Just saying things 'in the open' and volunteering insults about me right and left as you have done, is not what I'm talking about. The courtesy is to inform the other person that you are insulting him or her, so he/she can defend him/herself, which you have not done.
Thank you for your consideration of this longstanding FR custom.
R-I-N-O = Republican-In-Name-Only.......ie, NOT a real Republican (like Hillary is a Wife in Name Only......you get that?).
If Bush is RINO, then by definition, he is NOT a real Republican. That's what the term means, sir.
(Nurse let you out of your room, did she? :)
I take back what I said about fair and balanced...mistake on spelling a few posts back..it was suppose to be UNbalanced...
Make sure you keep those curtains drawn tightly..the sun is out...you might consider taking your med's this morning..oops afternoon where you dwell in that deep dark cave of a mind...if you do not take med's I would give it some serious consideration...might need to double the dose, might make you rational...then again you wouldn't want to lose your superior rep.....my oh my....like I said earlier in a post let the sunshine in and do the world a favor....
Exactly.. And since most republicans are RINOs.. meaning ex-democrats.. its no wonder that most elected republican federal officials are too(RINOs).. Not all republicans are RINOs just most.. We have the republican government NOW that best represents the general republican constituency>> socialist.. Probably the ditz vote is factored in too.. meaning republican women.. not all but most are socialists..
Thats why reps. like Pence are so rare, there are a few like him, but very rare.. The democrats have brain washed(successfully) most republicans into being being big government malefactors.. because that is what a democrat IS.. a big government drone.. If Bush is not a big government drone.. then he IS stupid.. and manipulated by those that are..
Is Bush less conservative than Nixon? Is Bush less conservative than Ford? Is Bush less conservative than Eisenhower? Is Bush less conservative than (fill in the blank).........Reagan is the only past Republican President who might have been more conservative, and that is clearly debateable depending on the issue.
You keep saying that the Republican party has moved to the left, but that presumption can't be backed up with history.
All I care about are the facts, hosepipe, and your comments aren't backed up with them....
That is an entirely different discussion from whether or not any of us think Bush is as conservative as we would prefer.
Enjoy the day, son.........you have 3 hours more of it than I do (now you know that, thanks to my geography lesson the other day).
Make the most of it. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.