"Judge Roberts, are you Gay?" (My big gay zot)

[Populus Vult Decipi]

I’m not a bigot but I believe this question must be asked. A closeted gay chief justice will be vulnerable to blackmail and may try to implement an insidious agenda to destroy the traditional family.

Here’s some of the evidence:

-he only married in his 40s.

-his children were all adopted.

-he has supported gay rights in pro bono work.

And I'm not even getting into all the stories about his high school years...

---

Then we have the pictures:

hmm how many guys here ever posed for a picture holding a dish?

I was googling about gay judges and found this article about an alleged gay blackmail against L.B.J.'s supreme court justice Abe Fortas. Something to think about…

I’ll admit that none of this is conclusive but I thought I’d throw it out there anyway. The consequences of his confirmation, if I’m right, I think warrants the question.

[onyx]

Read your posts, but still think you're wondering is off base.

The guy is solid.

Not a Souter.

[BruceysMom]

My point is that as a believer I don't hold the unbelievers to the same standards that I attempt to maintain. ( I'm a practicing Christian and I'm gonna practice til I get it right)

[onyx]

Well stated. Like the practice of medicine. Even the best doctors are still "practicing."

[BruceysMom]

Whoops sorry it's late and Ive got the flu. I thought your respose was aimed at me.

[nmh]

I think your partisan outlook is blinding you ... .

There's soemthing creepy about this guy and it's not as though Bush hasn't put openly gay men in positions of authority ... .

I believe Ann Coutler has a point ... a "atealth candidate" has NEVER been a good choice for genuine conservatives.

[nmh]

I hope you are right.

[nmh]

Well it's not as though ole Bush hasn't put gays in positions of authority, by CHOICE:

Bush Gay appointees

Scott Evertz: Director, White House Office of National

AIDS Policy Special Assistant to Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services

Michael Guest: U.S. ambassador to Romania

Donald Cappocia: U.S. Fine Arts Commission

Mark Groombridge: Special Assistant, Undersecretary for Arms Control & International Security, State Department

Steve Fong: Department of Transportation

Jim Wiggins: Department of Transportation

Joe O’Neil: Director, White House Office of National AIDS Policy Deputy Director, Global AIDS Office, State Department

Mark R. Dybul: Chief Medical Officer, Global AIDS Office, State Department

Christopher Bates: Acting Deputy Director, White House Office of National AIDS Policy

Surely you are not going to deny this.

There are MANY others but these come to mind quickly.

Yeah, you're right, I DO discriminate against the utterly perverted. This kindof heavy duty denial is scary. I would NEVER trust the judgement of someone that is this screwed - NEVER.

[BruceysMom]

If you carefully read my post I never expressed support of anyone. I simply will not base my judgment of someone who's sexual habits are private, on a suspicion of homosexuality. I'm sure his wife is grateful that at least someone doesn't consider her a "beard"

[nmh]

"If you carefully read my post I never expressed support of anyone. I simply will not base my judgment of someone who's sexual habits are private, on a suspicion of homosexuality. I'm sure his wife is grateful that at least someone doesn't consider her a "beard" "

Sigh ... .

"I simply will not base my judgment of someone who's sexual habits are private, on a suspicion of homosexuality. "

That's precisely where we disagree.

There is NOTHING normal about being a homosexual. Nothing. If they can be in such denial of what parts fit together, you really can't rust their judgment. There is no limits to what else is obvious that they will deny.

What makes them abnormal is what takes place IN their bedroom. OTOH, they don't want to talk about THAT, OTOH what goes on in THERE is what makes them ABNORMAL. You don't need to know the sorted details of their perverted sex life to understand that they are NOT normal. The fact they claim to be homosexuals is enough for me and most normal people.

Make this will make you feel better ... heterosexuals that cheat on their wives, like ole Bill is also someone I'd NEVER trust.

Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'm not going to argue it further. If compartMENTALization is you thingie and you haven't learned from what took place with ole Bill and how that ridiculous "thinking" failed ... then I'm not going to get through either.

[BruceysMom]

I''m sorry but you just haven't proved that Mr. Roberts is a homosexual. I might feel about him as you do if it is proved a fact. A man that I dated for five years is now 61, never married and has no children. There is a picture of him on his wall of him naked that was taken by a male friend of his. He is as hetero as the day is long. He's a commitment phobic sex addict that finds it impossable to stay faithful to one woman. I suppose that there is some obscure Freudian twisted logic that makes him a closet homosexual also. Homosexuality is to me a very serious charge that should never be leveled lightly.

[Irish_Thatcherite]

Here’s some of the evidence:

-he only married in his 40s.

Sounds like a red-blooded hetero to me!

-his children were all adopted.

And...?

-he has supported gay rights in pro bono work.

Doesn't prove he's gay.

And I'm not even getting into all the stories about his high school years...

And I suppose you were a choir boy?

Eetard.

[ShandaLear]

Rumor has you are gay.

[ShandaLear]

If these people are qualified, what's the problem?

[nmh]

"If these people are qualified, what's the problem?"

Their ABNORMAL behavior in a life style choice.

I expand that to liberals as well. Ruth Bader Ginsberg, she's "qualified" too but look what she has done to the U.S.S.C.. I don't see liberals as normal either.

One can only hope that after 8 years of terror with Clinton leading the charge ... that compartMENTALIZATION doesn't work. Never has and never will.

[wimpycat]

I believe it has already been definitively proven that Roberts is not gay--he doesn't cover his bald spot.

[ShandaLear]

You are a bigot and do not represent conservatism. Conservatism recognizes the rights of the individual. You are advocating discrimination which IMO, is an afront to everyting conservatives stand for.

[nmh]

"You are a bigot and do not represent conservatism. Conservatism recognizes the rights of the individual. You are advocating discrimination which IMO, is an afront to everyting conservatives stand for."

You're certainly entitled to your nonsensical opinion but the fact remains that homosexuality is NOT normal and it anything but a "conservative" ideal.

I DO discriminate between what is normal and what is NOT normal. There is NOTHING normal about being a homosexual. It's wrong and I DO discriminate against what is WRONG. Honestly speaking I find YOU to be an "an affront to everything conservatives stand for" because you do NOT discriminate between what is NORMAL and what is NOT normal, homosexuality.

I don't want a homosexual in the highest legal position in the land. All you can expect is WRONG rulings on abnormal behavior and the promoting of it. It's folks that attempt to "think" like YOU, that are destroying this country with your promoting of immorality - homosexuality - it's IMMORAL and WRONG for all who engage in and defend it - people like YOU.

[lbjgal]

Hey...the pictures mean nothing as well as the stories which means just about every guy in California is gay........you need more proof on Chief Roberts ...for example kissing or make love to male companion.

lbjgal