Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Women Judges Likely Top President Bush's Supreme Court List
LifeNews.com ^ | 16 September 2005 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/15/2005 6:33:45 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Another couple of pro-life Justices would not go astray!
1 posted on 09/15/2005 6:33:45 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I could care less if a judge is "pro-life," I want a pro-states' rights judge.


2 posted on 09/15/2005 6:35:51 PM PDT by chet_in_ny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The dems are hoping for someone they can openly challenge. Was Roberts on anyone's prediction list?
3 posted on 09/15/2005 6:36:18 PM PDT by Ruth A.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

No mention of my candidate: Janice Rogers Brown.

But the others sound excellent as well. I know that Priscilla Owen & Edith Jones would be awesome. I've never heard of Karen Williams, but if she's the most conservative, she'd be excellent.


4 posted on 09/15/2005 6:40:25 PM PDT by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chet_in_ny

I want a judge that carries a big axe; for the sake of chopping the Federal Govt. back down to size.


5 posted on 09/15/2005 6:42:02 PM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I always get a flame or two when I post this link (It's the "feminist" part that alarms many FReepers) but I'm going to post it anyway: http://www.feministsforlife.org . Judge Roberts wife has served on the FFL board. I know that every FFL board member I've known, myself included, is a solid Republican. (Ann Coulter should take comfort in this fact, re Judge Roberts.)


6 posted on 09/15/2005 6:42:22 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.

Roberts was on some pundits' long lists, but I don't think he was ever listed as among the most likely. He was something of a surprise.


7 posted on 09/15/2005 6:42:52 PM PDT by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

She's mine, too.
Her verbal skills will make Biden cry.
I'm begging to see that.


8 posted on 09/15/2005 6:46:27 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Lurk forever, but once you post, your newbness shines like a new pair of shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ruth A.
The dems are hoping for someone they can openly challenge. Was Roberts on anyone's prediction list?

I agree completely.

As much as I would like to have some of the already-suggested people appointed, I wonder if GW doesn't have some surprise "trick up his sleeve."

Is there anyone who wants another repeat of the bloodthirsty Thomas or Bork hearings?

Talk about throwing red meat to hungry wolves (the Dems).

9 posted on 09/15/2005 6:47:59 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

It's been eleven years or so since I went to an FFL board meeting, but I wouldn't have described them then as solid Republican. I still give the organization money but I think they are morally conservative (and rather shy about it) but politically liberal - all carrot and no stick. A society just won't work that way - it's against human nature.


10 posted on 09/15/2005 6:49:02 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

Feminists for Life--one of my all-time favorite groups, right up there with Second Amendment Sisters. ;)

It's fun to turn the tables on the opposition once in a while. :)


11 posted on 09/15/2005 6:50:10 PM PDT by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: heartwood
I wouldn't say they are "shy" about their "moral conservatism," but stealth. Effectively so.
12 posted on 09/15/2005 7:01:56 PM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher; newsgatherer

Getting an outspokenly pro-Life Nominee through the Congressional gauntlet into the Supreme Court to fill O'Connor's seat will be like getting butter out of a wildcat's rump with a red-hot poker.

RINOS who might grudgingly accept Roberts will, I predict, turn on us in a heartbeat if that ever happens.

Count on a fillibuster, and the "Gang of 14" voting against cloture.

Borking has worked for the Commiocraps in the past - so why should they ever give up on it?


13 posted on 09/15/2005 7:05:50 PM PDT by Uncle Jaque (Vigilance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chet_in_ny
I could care less if a judge is "pro-life," I want a pro-states' rights judge.

aka a pro-Constitution judge.....

14 posted on 09/15/2005 7:06:15 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher; chet_in_ny
Doesn't matter if you are "pro life" or not. Roe v Wade was a flawed decision because it was predicated on the basis of "right to privacy." If abortion is a private matter, then one need not have a medical license to perform one or should be publicly funded as a nonprofit ie Planned Parenthood.
15 posted on 09/15/2005 7:11:29 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Life, liberty, etc., isn't it?


16 posted on 09/15/2005 7:12:30 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
Talk about throwing red meat to hungry wolves (the Dems)

Yeah, but didn't the Dems controls the action then?

I mean, now that the Pubs control the Senate, the House, and the committee chairs, they hold the upper hand now, and all of this Democratic gnashing of teeth is just PR.

Unless they filibuster, they won't prevail, and if they do, it's very likely that they would be nuked.

17 posted on 09/15/2005 7:13:13 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

My point exactly. Unfortunately sheeple have framed this issue as "pro-choice" and "pro-life"


18 posted on 09/15/2005 7:14:55 PM PDT by chet_in_ny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

Born 1951 in Orangeburg, SC

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on January 27, 1992, to a seat vacated by Robert Foster Chapman; Confirmed by the Senate on February 27, 1992, and received commission on March 2, 1992.

Education:
Columbia College, B.A., 1972

University of South Carolina Law Center, J.D., 1980

Professional Career:
Private practice, Orangeburg, South Carolina, 1980-1992


Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Female


19 posted on 09/15/2005 7:15:20 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

OOps 19 is Karren Williams.


20 posted on 09/15/2005 7:16:47 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson