1 posted on
09/13/2005 5:05:01 AM PDT by
jmc1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: jmc1969
The site, which tends to publish unreliable biased news reports No kidding.
2 posted on
09/13/2005 5:06:14 AM PDT by
livius
To: jmc1969
But there are/were no WMDs in Iraq ...
Pelosi said so.
3 posted on
09/13/2005 5:06:49 AM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: jmc1969
The knuckleheads have been making this threat as of late. Hopefuly untrue, but if it turns out to have substance, the response should be drastic.
5 posted on
09/13/2005 5:08:57 AM PDT by
M1911A1
To: jmc1969
Prayers for the good guys should this happen to be true.
7 posted on
09/13/2005 5:12:25 AM PDT by
Quilla
To: jmc1969
I can't picture our military allowing a mortar attack to go on for 1 1/2 hrs. After the first round the source would have been targeted and fired on.
9 posted on
09/13/2005 5:14:17 AM PDT by
Flint
To: jmc1969
Breaking news from an unreliable site?..Hmmmm
13 posted on
09/13/2005 5:21:32 AM PDT by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: jmc1969
What do these Arabs consider a chemical weapon. A foreign substance that irritates the skin.. hmm powdered soap?
14 posted on
09/13/2005 5:22:28 AM PDT by
badpacifist
(grumpy comments always directed at post not the person posting info)
To: jmc1969
What if you threw a chemical weapons attack and nobody was there to notice? Would it still cause skin blisters?
To: jmc1969
A dozen Mohammeds eating beans and cabbage and then farting loudly in unison hardly constitutes a chemical attack.
24 posted on
09/13/2005 5:41:38 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: jmc1969
The mortar shells did contain some chemicals...the explosives that injured no one.
25 posted on
09/13/2005 5:41:38 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: jmc1969
The site, which tends to publish unreliable biased news reports, celebrates it as the first chemical attack in Iraq."Really!? What about Saddam and his henchmen Chemical Ali ... who were killing innocent civilians with chemical agents 20 years ago?
26 posted on
09/13/2005 5:44:35 AM PDT by
BluH2o
To: jmc1969
Iraq: Jihadist Group uses gullible and willing Media to spread it's pathetic Lies.
28 posted on
09/13/2005 5:45:23 AM PDT by
pissant
To: jmc1969
I hope the story is WRONG. This would be unfortunate news. My thoughts are with our troops and the Iraqis.
30 posted on
09/13/2005 6:04:59 AM PDT by
newzjunkey
(CA Freepers, HELP Enforce Our Border: http://www.CaliforniaBorderPolice.com/)
To: jmc1969
WMD? They should have remained mum about such toys.
They had useful idiots in America believing that Saddam really did destroy all he had and that no rogue nation would sponsor their production or storage.
32 posted on
09/13/2005 6:20:29 AM PDT by
weegee
(The lesson from New Orleans? Smart Growth kills. You can't evacuate dense populations easily.)
To: jmc1969
This is impossible. There were no WMD's in Iraq. It was all a lie. Remember?
To: jmc1969
If these weasels have any chem weapons, they will use them on unsuspecting civilians. In that respect, a Baghdad attack makes sense.
To: jmc1969
Wouldn't it be a gas if we announce that the only direct hit was on Saddam's cell?
To: jmc1969
A few cans of RAID and a potato gun hardly constitutes a chemical attack.
43 posted on
09/13/2005 10:05:12 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(Proud member of the 21st century Christian Crusaders)
To: jmc1969
Meanwhile, in another development in the Middle East, the Muslim propaganda outlet, al Jazeera, announced the sudden, complete disappearance of Damascus, Syria. According to al Jazeera, "We're not sure what happened, it just seems to have vaporized, replaced by shiny, black glass"...
44 posted on
09/13/2005 10:51:26 AM PDT by
astounded
(We don't need no stinkin' rules of engagement...)
To: Allegra
49 posted on
09/13/2005 2:19:56 PM PDT by
BagCamAddict
(Prayers for the victims of Katrina)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson