Posted on 09/10/2005 1:13:26 PM PDT by JRochelle
There's a growing outcry that one element of the newly chosen Flight 93 National Memorial represents Islam and is a slap in the face to the passengers and crew members who died on the hijacked plane four years ago. The winning design, announced Wednesday in Washington, D.C., includes what is called the "Crescent of Embrace."
(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...
However, the cross has a great significance to everybody. Ever wonder why they don't have the Red Cross in Muslim countries? They have the "Red Crescent."
(Still fed to the back teeth with hypocritical dhimmis.)
http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/12596768.htm
Posted on Fri, Sep. 09, 2005
"Preacher vows fight over Flight 93 memorial design"
Associated Press
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "SOMERSET, Pa. - A Somerset County preacher vowed to fight the design of the Flight 93 National Memorial, insisting that the crescent pathway used in the design is a symbol of Islam.
"This is a memorial to the terrorists who killed those people, not a memorial to the folks who died there innocently," said the Rev. Ron McRae, leader of the Bible Anabaptist Church near Jerome, about 55 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.
"The crescent is as much connected to Islam as the cross is to Christianity," said McRae of Conemaugh Township, also listed as director and founder on the Web site of the Lancaster-based Street Preachers Fellowship.
McRae said the group may go to court to try to block the "Crescent of Embrace" memorial designed by Paul Murdoch Associates of Los Angeles. The design centers around a mile-long semicircle of red maples surrounding the point of impact, where 40 passengers and crew were killed when the hijacked plane crashed near Shanksville on Sept. 11, 2001.
Though not accepted by all Muslims, the crescent moon and star is an internationally recognized symbol of Islam and appears on the flags of many Muslim nations."

Someone in the article said it would be a monument to the terrorists. He's right. Even if one were to argue that Islam isn't to blame for what happened, it's still what the terrorists were acting in the name of, and putting it there gives encouragement to Islamic terrorists.
Is he talking about Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari, Satam M.A. Al Suqami, Wail M. Alshehri, Waleed M. Alshehri, Marwan al-Shehhi, Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad, Ahmed Alghamdi, Hamza Alghamdi, Mohand Alshehri, Hani Hanjour, Nawaf Alhazmi, Majed Moqed, Khalid Almihdhar, Salem Alhazmi, Ziad Samir Jarrah, Saeed Alghamdi, Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi and Ahmed Alnami???
Guess he is right...some Muslims did die in the attacks.
How tragic! He was probably the only Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad on the entire planet.
(I wonder, when he was a child and misbehaved, did his mother address him by his full name in a stern manner?)
http://www.flight93memorialproject.org/contactus.asp
Let the National Park Service know how we feel about this outrage:
By Phone
Superintendent - Flight 93 National Memorial
(814) 443-4557
By Fax
(814)443-2180
Look like this is Teresa Heinz' doing...
http://www.flight93memorialproject.org/competition_overview.asp
The Flight 93 National Memorial Design Competition has been funded through the generous support of the Heinz Endowments and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.
We eradicated Nazism; we can eradicate Islam if we have the will to do so. It's time for Allah to die. Let's get on with it.
CAIR has already been outed as supporting terrorists. They serve as nothing but a front group to shield Islamonazis.
Persons interested in submitting written comments may do so via
mail, hand-delivery, facsimile or e-mail to Jeffrey P. Reinbold, Flight
93 NM Project Manager, at the following address:
Jeffrey P. Reinbold, Project Manager, National Park Service, 109
West Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501, Facsimile: (814)
443-2180, E-Mail: jeff_reinbold@nps.gov.
Burn it and then plow the beyatch under.
OPINION: MEDIA SLANT when it comes to Christians and Jews these days is very slanted. That's not a good thing and is not professional.
From a design jury member:
"Last year, our second class of the fall season happened to have been scheduled for 9/11, and so, of course, did not happen. The semester was foreshortened by the attacks on the World Trade Center. For a while the New School buildings served as staging areas for some emergency services. Several students came closer to the carnage than anyone should. Our academic world became more real as we talked about America's arrogant and profligate energy use, which was dramatically embedded in the twin towers, now turned to one big toxic pile of dust. The rubble was burning not far from where we sat. those who will give forms to our physical environment-my twenty-eight hopes for the future of a new design ethic-had a hard time ignoring this fact of their lives. The collapse shows, among other things, that our current American lifestyle is unsustainable."
http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=149
Another jury member was Donna Graves, a contributor to the Buddhist Peace Fellowship.
I fully acknowledge the horrendous grief the families have no doubt suffered and continue to suffer. This, however, isn't solely about them. ALL who love our country took a huge hit on 9/11, not just them. So while I agree that family opinion should be weighted, I don't see their lack of objection as the end-all of the criticism.
I'm not one who tries to read symbolism into everything I see, but the connection here is near impossible to miss and it's grossly inappropriate. I think it's a real stretch to believe this issue didn't come up when this design was being created.
MM
I somehow think they knew what they were doing. Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.