Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why take time to rally Parker again? (anti- David Parker editorial)
Lexington Minuteman ^ | September 8, 2005 | Editor

Posted on 09/09/2005 3:07:16 PM PDT by lexfreedom

Editorial: Why take time to rally Parker again?

Thursday, September 8, 2005

The staff of the Lexington Minuteman fully supports freedom of speech, the right to assemble and the right for everyone to have their own opinions.

But there is a time and place for everything.

This week, the time was neither the time for protesting the schools, nor supporting or opposing David Parker. This week it was for supporting those who have much bigger problems in this lifetime: the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

It may not have hit here physically. Though gasoline prices have skyrocketed, we still have streets paved with concrete, not water. We have houses to live in, schools to attend and lives to lead.

Those hit by Katrina have none of that. There are those helping out in Lexington: Judith Jameson is collecting items for children and adults who will be staying at Otis Air Force Base (story, Page 1), various lemonade stands have been seen around town from the bike path in the Center to the path's intersection with Seasons Four. Even the Battle Green Inn is pitching in offering rooms to those affected.

With all this devastation in the country, why then, did folks find it necessary to "rally" for and against what has already been rallied, argued, debated several times?

At least this week, keep in mind there is a bigger picture than Lexington.


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: davidparker; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; parentalrights
Why take time to rally Parker again?

Because as of the night of the rally, David Parker was (and still now remains) BANNED from ALL Lexington Public School property.

He was not able to attend his son's first day of first grade! The Lexington schools have trampled on his rights and issued a (most likely illegal) restraining order barring him from setting foot on any school property. He cannot attend any school functions at his son's school, he cannot represent his point of view at school committee meetings, he cannot VOTE!

Lexington Massachusetts, birthplace of new tyranny.

Visit:

www.davidparkerfacts.org

for more information and to support the Parkers.

1 posted on 09/09/2005 3:07:22 PM PDT by lexfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

Their Lexington Minutemen tag is pretty ironic.


2 posted on 09/09/2005 3:11:54 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Calpernia; gidget7
Ping

Please help make sure all the proper keywords are added to the Parker threads. Thanks.

3 posted on 09/09/2005 3:19:04 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (Harry's Soapbox ( http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

I'll ping it out in a while.

And I shamefacedly admit I have been very lax on adding keywords, I'll try to remember to do it!

Thanks for the alert.


4 posted on 09/09/2005 3:24:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom
Ok, I read the David Parker fact sheet. I have a question why does he not take his child / ren out of school and home school.
It is not giving up, it is saving his child / ren.
If true as started, I am disgusted.
I was involved for years in the San Lorenzo Valley School District (Santa Cruz County) over fights with these egomaniac administrators over issues of race and homosexuality.
We had one teacher at the high school who decorated a Christmas tree with condoms, as an in your face gesture because I was able with the help of my friend on the education parent committee to stop the distribution of condoms on campus.
I understand the fight. The first concern needs to be for the safety of his child / ren. They will be punished. Fortunately my child was able to stand up to these bullies because she knew the California State Educations laws as well as or better than the school district.
Alright, to long ... I'll shut up now.
5 posted on 09/09/2005 3:35:46 PM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DirtyHarryY2K

Ditto what lj said!!


6 posted on 09/09/2005 3:55:02 PM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: roylene
I have a question why does he not take his child / ren out of school and home school.

That is the exact statement made by many on the other side, the ones who talk about "inclusive" schools and "welcoming all children" (see the article about the rally). These are PUBLIC schools that are financed by TAXPAYER dollars (including David Parker's). What the rest of the country doesn't realize is that this is a historic occasion where on the hallowed grounds of Lexington, MA, birthplace of American liberty, new patriots are taking a stand against this new tyranny foisted on parents and kids by those who would use the schools to foist their own views on everyone. All David Parker asked for was the notification and option to shield his child from discussions of sexuality, which just so happens to be the law. Not everyone can home school or put their kids in private school. More than that, people need to fight back, for their kids sakes, and for ALL kids. There are so many uninformed people on the sidelines that take for truth what they read in the papers or see/hear in the media.

We must fight for our rights:

www.davidparkerfund.org

help support the fight! Or it will be on your doorstep next.

7 posted on 09/09/2005 3:55:56 PM PDT by lexfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roylene

I believe he feels that leaving will not fix or bring much needed attention to the problem. His child would be safe, but what about all the others whose parents may not know.


8 posted on 09/09/2005 3:58:01 PM PDT by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom
I understand the fight. My husband and I were threatened, some one tried to burn our home down. I get it.
I am concerned over a kindergartner.
If the law says he can opt out his child, then I feel like I am not getting all the information.
If David is being belligerent and disruptive at these meetings (I am not saying he is), the school district will call in the authorities. I saw it done at my school board meetings. We found a local attorny to represent our cause, pro bono. It is very difficult to not be a screaming maniac when these school boards and administrators are such idiots but if thats the case they will not listen to you.
The Japanese have a great saying, "the first one to raise their voice has lost the argument'". It does his cause no good if he is not permitted to attend the meetings or see his child / ren teacher.
9 posted on 09/09/2005 4:07:31 PM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: roylene
If David is being belligerent and disruptive at these meetings (I am not saying he is), the school district will call in the authorities.

You can see interviews with David Parker on numerous sites. He's been on Fox multiple times and on the local news. He's the model of reasonableness and moderation in his demeanor and behavior. There isn't any question about his behavior being out of line in the least. That's what makes the other side's behavior even more egregious in comparison. All he's doing is taking a principled stand and asking respectfully, but firmly, that his rights as a parent and citizen be honored.

10 posted on 09/09/2005 5:28:12 PM PDT by lexfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

More on David Parker and his shameful treatment at the hands of knaves in Massachusetts. Keep you eyes on this issue. We'll be seeing more of this.

Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.


11 posted on 09/09/2005 5:52:50 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

David Parker should get an attorney who will sue on behalf of his child. His/Her rights are being violated.


12 posted on 09/09/2005 6:33:52 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: roylene
If the law says he can opt out his child, then I feel like I am not getting all the information.

That's just it...the school wouldn't agree to that. Discussing 'families' is not discussing sexuality and you, the parent, cannot opt out your child unless the discussion is about sexuality...the discussion of which they say doesn't begin till the 5th grade...

13 posted on 09/09/2005 6:48:32 PM PDT by CatQuilt (GLSEN is evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

The State will educate your child. You do not know what is best for your child. Only the State can properly determine what your child should know to be a productive member of the Communi/Party.

"We keep you alive to serve this ship, number 41."


14 posted on 09/09/2005 7:03:40 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roylene
It is very difficult to not be a screaming maniac when these school boards and administrators are such idiots but if thats the case they will not listen to you.

I was so pissed about what I experienced in the schools in the town that I grew up in that I ran for school committee when I was in my late '20s. I used the soapbox to tell parents what really happens in school. The only other thing I talked about was vouchers. Of course, vouchers are unconstitutional in Massachusetts, but the local newspapers never figured that out.

When our kids came along, we moved out of town 8-)

Didn't matter anyway though because we decided from the beginning to homeschool.

The situation is close to hopeless. The only way to break the teacher union/socialist/pervert deathgrip on gov't schooling is vouchers.

15 posted on 09/11/2005 4:17:52 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson