Posted on 09/03/2005 3:35:13 PM PDT by Chief Engineer
An Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of the Welfare State
Sep 02, 2005 by Robert Tracinski
It has taken four long days for state and federal officials to figure out how to deal with the disaster in New Orleans. I can't blame them, because it has also taken me four long days to figure out what is going on there. The reason is that the events there make no sense if you think that we are confronting a natural disaster.
If this is just a natural disaster, the response for public officials is obvious: you bring in food, water, and doctors; you send transportation to evacuate refugees to temporary shelters; you send engineers to stop the flooding and rebuild the city's infrastructure. For journalists, natural disasters also have a familiar pattern: the heroism of ordinary people pulling together to survive; the hard work and dedication of doctors, nurses, and rescue workers; the steps being taken to clean up and rebuild.
Public officials did not expect that the first thing they would have to do is to send thousands of armed troops in armored vehicle, as if they are suppressing an enemy insurgency. And journalists--myself included--did not expect that the story would not be about rain, wind, and flooding, but about rape, murder, and looting.
But this is not a natural disaster. It is a man-made disaster.
The man-made disaster is not an inadequate or incompetent response by federal relief agencies, and it was not directly caused by Hurricane Katrina. This is where just about every newspaper and television channel has gotten the story wrong.
The man-made disaster we are now witnessing in New Orleans did not happen over the past four days. It happened over the past four decades. Hurricane Katrina merely exposed it to public view.
The man-made disaster is the welfare state.
For the past few days, I have found the news from New Orleans to be confusing. People were not behaving as you would expect them to behave in an emergency--indeed, they were not behaving as they have behaved in other emergencies. That is what has shocked so many people: they have been saying that this is not what we expect from America. In fact, it is not even what we expect from a Third World country.
When confronted with a disaster, people usually rise to the occasion. They work together to rescue people in danger, and they spontaneously organize to keep order and solve problems. This is especially true in America. We are an enterprising people, used to relying on our own initiative rather than waiting around for the government to take care of us. I have seen this a hundred times, in small examples (a small town whose main traffic light had gone out, causing ordinary citizens to get out of their cars and serve as impromptu traffic cops, directing cars through the intersection) and large ones (the spontaneous response of New Yorkers to September 11).
So what explains the chaos in New Orleans?
To give you an idea of the magnitude of what is going on, here is a description from a Washington Times story:
"Storm victims are raped and beaten; fights erupt with flying fists, knives and guns; fires are breaking out; corpses litter the streets; and police and rescue helicopters are repeatedly fired on.
"The plea from Mayor C. Ray Nagin came even as National Guardsmen poured in to restore order and stop the looting, carjackings and gunfire....
"Last night, Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco said 300 Iraq-hardened Arkansas National Guard members were inside New Orleans with shoot-to-kill orders.
" 'These troops are...under my orders to restore order in the streets,' she said. 'They have M-16s, and they are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will.' "
The reference to Iraq is eerie. The photo that accompanies this article shows National Guard troops, with rifles and armored vests, riding on an armored vehicle through trash-strewn streets lined by a rabble of squalid, listless people, one of whom appears to be yelling at them. It looks exactly like a scene from Sadr City in Baghdad.
What explains bands of thugs using a natural disaster as an excuse for an orgy of looting, armed robbery, and rape? What causes unruly mobs to storm the very buses that have arrived to evacuate them, causing the drivers to drive away, frightened for their lives? What causes people to attack the doctors trying to treat patients at the Super Dome?
Why are people responding to natural destruction by causing further destruction? Why are they attacking the people who are trying to help them?
My wife, Sherri, figured it out first, and she figured it out on a sense-of-life level. While watching the coverage last night on Fox News Channel, she told me that she was getting a familiar feeling. She studied architecture at the Illinois Institute of Chicago, which is located in the South Side of Chicago just blocks away from the Robert Taylor Homes, one of the largest high-rise public housing projects in America. "The projects," as they were known, were infamous for uncontrollable crime and irremediable squalor. (They have since, mercifully, been demolished.)
What Sherri was getting from last night's television coverage was a whiff of the sense of life of "the projects." Then the "crawl"--the informational phrases flashed at the bottom of the screen on most news channels--gave some vital statistics to confirm this sense: 75% of the residents of New Orleans had already evacuated before the hurricane, and of the 300,000 or so who remained, a large number were from the city's public housing projects. Jack Wakeland then gave me an additional, crucial fact: early reports from CNN and Fox indicated that the city had no plan for evacuating all of the prisoners in the city's jails--so they just let many of them loose. There is no doubt a significant overlap between these two populations--that is, a large number of people in the jails used to live in the housing projects, and vice versa.
There were many decent, innocent people trapped in New Orleans when the deluge hit--but they were trapped alongside large numbers of people from two groups: criminals--and wards of the welfare state, people selected, over decades, for their lack of initiative and self-induced helplessness. The welfare wards were a mass of sheep--on whom the incompetent administration of New Orleans unleashed a pack of wolves.
All of this is related, incidentally, to the apparent incompetence of the city government, which failed to plan for a total evacuation of the city, despite the knowledge that this might be necessary. But in a city corrupted by the welfare state, the job of city officials is to ensure the flow of handouts to welfare recipients and patronage to political supporters--not to ensure a lawful, orderly evacuation in case of emergency.
No one has really reported this story, as far as I can tell. In fact, some are already actively distorting it, blaming President Bush, for example, for failing to personally ensure that the Mayor of New Orleans had drafted an adequate evacuation plan. The worst example is an execrable piece from the Toronto Globe and Mail, by a supercilious Canadian who blames the chaos on American "individualism." But the truth is precisely the opposite: the chaos was caused by a system that was the exact opposite of individualism.
What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state. What we consider "normal" behavior in an emergency is behavior that is normal for people who have values and take the responsibility to pursue and protect them. People with values respond to a disaster by fighting against it and doing whatever it takes to overcome the difficulties they face. They don't sit around and complain that the government hasn't taken care of them. They don't use the chaos of a disaster as an opportunity to prey on their fellow men.
But what about criminals and welfare parasites? Do they worry about saving their houses and property? They don't, because they don't own anything. Do they worry about what is going to happen to their businesses or how they are going to make a living? They never worried about those things before. Do they worry about crime and looting? But living off of stolen wealth is a way of life for them.
The welfare state--and the brutish, uncivilized mentality it sustains and encourages--is the man-made disaster that explains the moral ugliness that has swamped New Orleans. And that is the story that no one is reporting.
Source: TIA Daily -- September 2, 2005
So it might not?
When A is accompanied by B and not A is accompanied by not B it is an indication of causal relationship, but not a proof. Especially in soft disciplines like economy, political science or sociology.
For example A and B might have common cause C, or relationship might be reversed.
For example more widespread education (C) might reduce poverty and induce society to introduce welfare system. Or more affluence can make welfare more affordable. (Third World countries do not have welfare because they are too poor to fund it).
I would agree with this to an extent, but there is a caveat. This is the first time in our nation's history that we have elevated these sort of people and glorified their way of life by subsidizing it to the extent that nobody really has to work for a living anymore. If you don't have money, whine long enough and loud enough and some government agency will step in and help you out.
We have always had lazy and criminal types in our midst, but now, we make it easy for them to exist in comfort instead of being outcasts forced to find their own way.
Welfare breeds dependency.
Dependency breeds a mindset that stifles individualism and creativity, even in survival situations.
Dependency breeds a trait where, when faced with chaos and difficult decisions to make, the welfare midset causes one to only look to others for help, instead of taking charge and helping each other. In New Orleans, we saw everybody look to each other to help them, but realized the only people around them were looking at each other for help. This is when total chaos occurred.
If this was a mass of people brought up to think and act responsibly, we would have seen people helping each other (no matter how dire the situation), not raping and murdering each other.
Welfare is tragic. It breeds hell fron one generation to the next. We must find a way to end welfare as we know it.
Okay ;)
We'll compromise.
Socialistic, poverty pimps!
How's that?
;)
Welfare breeds poverty!
---
FYI, in pictures:
http://www.neoperspectives.com/summary.htm
Laser sharp commentary. I can't understand why it would be pulled. Yes, it is about racism: the virulent racism of the left. It should be studied and appreciated for its truth.
In fairness, my comments did push some buttons. It addressed the same issues, but was interpreted by the mode to be over the line. I disagree, but that's the way it is when you have a person officiating. You won't in all instances agree.
Thanks for the comments. I am in agreement with you.
>>This guy is right on
Ditto to that.
This article should be read by EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the world! Thanks so much for posting it!
I'm not saying it's the only source, but it is a source.
BTTT
Are they registered to vote?
What is missing is a sense of belonging, now that the social order has collapsed it may never be properly restored.
The people running wild had nothing to begin with and now they've lost even that.
ping
One of the things that everyone is missing, is that these people have been living in the projects all their lives.
Why? Because the federal government (HUD) hasn't got the balls to set a time limit on almost free rent for the "poor". Some of these people, I would venture to say, are living in the exact same homes/apartments that their grandparents lived in - and maybe even great grandparents.
If this is ever going to be cleaned up and people are really given a chance to better themselves, then HUD and the Congress have to step up to the plate and set limits to the length of time able bodied people (seniors and disabled exempt) are allowed to "life free".
The illustrious mayor ignored the pleas to use the school buses. He wanted Greyhound buses. (???) Then he lashed out at the feds for not being "creative." Oh, so much finger-pointing and CYA!
I couldn't bring up your URL page. You have an interesting personal perspective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.