Posted on 08/15/2005 5:55:06 AM PDT by OESY
A major domestic battle looms this fall, when tax reform-- a centerpiece of the president's bold domestic agenda-- will finally be on the table. The President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform is expected to release its findings by the end of September. After the political shellacking the White House took on Social Security, the administration will be strongly tempted to take a conciliatory path that supports only superficial reforms, essentially preserving the status quo of our hideous income tax code.
Such a course would have perilous consequences, economically and politically. In fact, the administration has an opportunity here to boldly retake the initiative, to recover lost political support and thrust an already decent economy into high gear and, at the same time, make America better able to meet intensifying competition from China, India and others. How? By junking the entire federal income tax code and starting over with a flat tax. A growing number of countries are doing this -- and so should we.
The current system is beyond redemption, a beast whose complexity, confusion and outright unfairness have corrupted our economy and society. Americans waste more than $200 billion and over six billion hours each year filling out tax forms. They engage in all kinds of useless economic activity intended to take advantage of the code's complicated maze of deductions and to reduce taxes -- from deducting donations of old socks to making unwanted investments. The waste of brainpower -- at a time of increasing global competition -- is incalculable.
The code corrupts our system of government by encouraging the crassest political conduct and by creating a massive, intrusive federal bureaucracy. One-sixth of the private-sector employees in Washington are employed by the lobbying industry. One-half of their efforts are directed at wrangling changes in the tax code....
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
The other part of this will be the elimination of paper money
greater than 10$. Everything over that would be done via credit cards or one time use money orders.
Which is why we'll never be rid of the tax code.
The current tax debate is simple to explain:
The current code allows the very richest to shelter their earnings in ways that are unavailable to Joe Sixpack, and for the poorest to get a totally free ride. Vast amounts of time and money are spent to keep this disfunctional system alive. In addition, a corrupt and overreaching federal bureaucracy (the IRS) is a mechanism used to keep the sheeple under tight control.
The "flat" tax is what our current system started out to be. Forget that our Founders wanted excises and duties to pay for the cost of government; any attempt to go to a flat tax will result in the same mess we have now - eventually.
Lastly, the Fair Tax - the rich don't like it because they will lose their comfortable tax shelters, and will have to foot a huge tax bite when they spend money for their luxuries. The little guy ought to love it, because they maintain their free ride. The middle class will love it because it gets the IRS off their back, and will allow them to save money tax free.
It really is that simple. If you love freedom, hate the IRS, and are ready for a positive change for America... support the Fair Tax (HR 25, SB 25).
And whyever would THAT be done?? There is no reason for it, and I am absolutely opposed to it.
The "flat tax" will NOT abolish the IRS, and the "Fair Tax" (national sales tax) is a better way of reforming the tax code.
Flat Tax ~ Bump!
I expect a national sales tax in addition to an income tax. Both have great possibilities for social engineering. For example, food could be slightly taxed and tobacco and alcohol taxed at a high rate. Likewise, fatty food could be taxed at a slightly higher rate than leafy green vegetables. "American" companies could be taxed at a lower rate than "foreign" companies. (A Ford assembled in Mexico vs a Toyota assembled in Alabama for example.)
No, I am not very rich, but I am in the middle class. Yes, we will face the tax when we go to the mall. However, we will get to keep every last cent of our paychecks, and we (as well as every taxpayer) will have our taxes rebated up to the poverty line.
The choice will once again be ours: hmmmm... do I buy that $130 pair of Nikes, or do I buy the $30 pair of Keds and bank the rest?
Sure, when there is a "consumption tax" you are going to pay when you consume. The rebate will subsidise groceries, etc. but EVERYONE will pay the freight for nonessentials - rich, middle class, poor.
Why would that be?
I find myself leaning slightly to the flat tax system, mindful of the fact that is how the current mess started.
I am concerned that the fair tax system would end up being a hidden tax. I also wonder how it would ever pass, seeing that the opposed would be able to claim it is an inherently unfair system as lower incomes spend all their income, paying tax on all their income, while upper incomes are able to save a portion, thus that portion being untaxed. I really do need to do some more reading and educate myself more on both systems.
Leftists typically push for unwieldy laws and big, complicated, burocracies and government; then they spend countless effort getting around these laws. They seem to feel that enacting a law to solve a problem actually solves the problem; thinking beyond this is of no concern to them.
The unwieldy tax system is an excellent example. I don't know how many Leftists have explained to me how they get around the tax laws. One woman, who works for the Democrat Party, explained countless times that she has a "creative accountant" and that I should employ him. I didn't follow her advice about this any more than I would about anything else.
Ever been to Stinson Beach? Notice how many "No Dogs Allowed" signs are posted. I've never seen so many dogs on a beach.
If everyone in California spent as much time in productive work that they spend trying to get around the state's cumbersome laws, the state could be operating in the black, and they could afford to construct some good new roads, including much needed east-west arteries.
The Left loves complicated laws--the more and the more cumbersome, the better, because it makes graft and corruption easy.
The increase in tax revenues resulting from Bush's tax cut and pressure from the growing economies of India and China strengthen Forbes' argument; however, the Left remains the big problem and obstruction. Let's hope the American people see the wisdom of Forbes' advice and the foolishness of allowing the Left to weaken the economy any more than it already has.
You seriously need to read and understand a little about the Fair Tax before you attempt any further comment.
I like the idea of a flat tax, and have no idea what am adequate rate would be. To me, though, if you want to sell the idea of tax reform to an apathetic audience, you eliminate payroll deductions and have workers write a check every month for their tax burden. There would be clamor for reform within three months, especially when those that actually have to pay taxes see those that do not. This would also lead to demands for shrinking the size of the government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.