Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cindy Sheehan: "My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel."
Cindy's Usenet Posts ^ | Various | Cindy Sheehan

Posted on 08/10/2005 1:47:20 PM PDT by Sam Hill

From: SCINDY...@aol.com
  To: ter...@mweb.co.th ; bullyard@googlegroups.com
 

  Cc: skee...@ksc.th.com ; jwa...@cox.net ; h...@bfranklin.edu ; steppenwo...@msn.com ; Kurn...@netscape.net ; m...@loxinfo.co.th ; TQMN...@aol.com ; zpbr...@cox.net ; sharinpa...@hotmail.com ; v...@netium.com.br
  Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:41 AM
  Subject: Re: Fw: Nightline Tonight Mon., March 14, 2005
 

  That was my son's unit. He was killed on that day 04/04/04. Here is a letter that I wrote to NightLine about the broadcast:
  Love
 

  Cindy Sheehan
 

  March 15, 2005
 

  To Whom it May Concern:
 

  Imagine my distress when I turned Night Line on last night and I was confronted with the gory details of my son's murder in Sadr City, Baghdad, Iraq on 04/04/04. Imagine, also, my sorrow and rage at the side of the story that you presented to the American public.

[SNIP]

  I was on the Night Line Townhall Meeting in Washington, DC on 01/27/05. After I spoke (which I think was a fluke), Ted Koppel dismissed me as being "emotional." First of all, how can I approach this discussion without emotions, MY SON WAS KILLED, AND KILLED FOR LIES? Second of all, that show was not fair and balanced and I think the conclusion "Should we stay" was foregone.
 

  The show last night was also not fair and balanced. To see all the wives being interviewed who had not lost their husbands and to hear what "hard work" it is to be left behind when their husbands are at war. How hard to you think it is to have a child killed in an illegal and immoral war? In this "wonderful" group of families left behind, we had exactly ONE of the wives call us..she is Diane Rose who was my son's Colonel, Frank Rose's wife. The last time we heard from Diane was in October and we feel we have been left behind by anyone connected to the 2-5 Cavalry. Is support only given if your loved one stays alive? One wife was quoted as saying that Sundays were the hardest for the families left behind. My son was killed on Palm Sunday last year..how does anybody think Sundays are for my family?
 

  Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by a George Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11. We were told that we were attacked on 9/11 because the terrorists hate our freedoms and democracy...not for the real reason, becuase the Arab-Muslims who attacked us hate our middle-eastern foreign policy. That hasn't changed since America invaded and occupied Iraq...in fact it has gotten worse.
 

  It would be so amazing if your show would put me, or another parent who lost their child on who disagrees with the war and this administration: to have just an entire show..without presenting the false side of the debate. That would take a lot of courage and integrity. I hope your program will exhibit these qualities.
 

  I also think that Mr. Koppel owes me an apology for the rude way I was treated on his show. After I expressed myself about the war being based on lies and that the troops should be brought home immediately because the war was based on lies, I was not thanked for my comments, or my son's sacrifice. He just said to keep the discussion away from emotions. Then, the wife of a soldier who was killed was allowed to speak and she praised the policies of this deplorable and despicable administration, and she was thanked and praised by the panel.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiisrael; antisemite; antisemitewhome; antisemitiscm; antisemitism; antizionist; cindybuchanan; cindyonhercross; cindysheehan; communism; communist; dramaqueen; driveninsanebygrief; jewhater; jewhatingmoonbat; kookaid; koolaid; leftwingantisemite; leftwingracist; liberalantisemitism; liberalfascism; liberalkoolaid; moonbat; mothersheehan; sheehan; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 981-1,000 next last
To: iconoclast

Sounds fair to me. And trust me, I'm Jewish and I don't like how easily 'anti-semite' is thrown around by some people. (Foxman, I'm looking your way. *shakes a fist*) I do think that Jews have historically gotten more than their fair share of misery from other people, though. And I think we're seeing a slight resurgence. Nothing too serious, though, so long as there are decent people who have learned to stand up for themselves and their friends and their morals and values. Which is why I love FR.

A country should always take care of its own national interests first, but it should protect its long term interests. Nor should it do anything grossly immoral. Also, for the record, I'm Canadian and we have 5 parties. Which effectively means we have 1 party which rules like tyrants and are never threatened because all the other votes are split and there's no other 'centrist' (by Canadian standards) party. Past a certain point, or with an apathetic or highly partisan population, more parties just hurts you. Look at Italy and Spain, which have tens of parties. I believe Italy has 50+ in fact.


421 posted on 08/10/2005 5:02:01 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Bill O'Reilly just reported that Cindy is posting messages on Michael Moore's web site.


422 posted on 08/10/2005 5:02:23 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: G32
So why exactly are you taking this woman's side?

Elementary my dear G32.

I did and would still support a vigorous war against Jihadist Muslims (possibly more vigorous than we are capable of at the moment) but I am and have been from day one been opposed to this tragic craziness in Iraq.

423 posted on 08/10/2005 5:03:46 PM PDT by iconoclast (Wastin' away again in hearts-and-minds'ville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Yep .. here's a link


http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index.php


424 posted on 08/10/2005 5:04:01 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

The rant is fine. Actually, you probably know this already, but popular interest in the Kabbalah isn't new. There was a similar spate of gentile interest in the 19th century. I seem to remember Conan Doyle even worked it into one of the Sherlock Holmes stories.


425 posted on 08/10/2005 5:05:46 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (Proudly neocon since 1982!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

Didn't say that at all. But Buchanan questions our entry into WW2 and has never met a former Nazi he didn't want to defend. He also 'jokingly' refers to President Bush's advisors as the 'Amen Corner', I wonder what that means?


426 posted on 08/10/2005 5:07:13 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Someone explain to me how the US is doing anything in Iraq that is of benefit to Israel. Use any brand of tin foil.

I could argue that Israel is immeasurably worse off then before.


427 posted on 08/10/2005 5:08:17 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Islam is to Peace as Rape is to Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast

"So why exactly are you taking this woman's side?

Elementary my dear G32."

If you are taking Sheehan (and Bin Laden's) side, where do you suggest Israel go when it/they leave Palestine?

Bin Laden--and presumably Sheehan--says "into the sea." What say you, deep thinker?


428 posted on 08/10/2005 5:09:04 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Nobody considers Israel to be the 51rst state. Saying that, is akin to saying that we consider England to be the 51rst state.

Your mistake, is that you either don't understand American foreign policy, or has a very twisted idea of what it is and what it is not.

Cindy Sheehan is posting on Michael Moore's web site. She is mouthing Code Pink and other subversives' propaganda.

429 posted on 08/10/2005 5:09:40 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
I will try to post some.

Please don't. Her insanity may be contageous.

430 posted on 08/10/2005 5:10:06 PM PDT by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
What the hell is a 'neo-con' anyway? I can't stand that word. Can't being conservative simply mean being an old-fashioned conservative anymore?

Nope...That would be a Paleocon...They're as rare as a white buffalo now days...

A paleo is a Barry Goldwater type...That would be anti-Nafta, Cafta, WTO and New World Order...No illegal alien amnesty for Paleocons...A whole different critter than Neocons.

431 posted on 08/10/2005 5:10:20 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: daybreakcoming
Yes, she WANTS to be "a martyr for the cause"; the cause being impeaching the president and besmirching the GOP and America.
432 posted on 08/10/2005 5:11:05 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
OK...who is THIS woman who O'Reilly has on? Elaine Chesterson. She sounds to me like she has been coopted by the same moonbat group.

I am suspicious. George Bush"marched into the rook" and he "trotted out some explanations." Sounds to me like because she hated Bush, everything she saw and heard was distorted by her attitude.

433 posted on 08/10/2005 5:11:33 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Karl Rove is Plame-proof.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: ariamne
I'd prefer Israel to some of the states we have, frankly. (no, not naming names!)

If we could only swap their geographic locations I'd be 100% with you! ;-)

434 posted on 08/10/2005 5:11:57 PM PDT by iconoclast (Wastin' away again in hearts-and-minds'ville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Cindy backed out so he has another whackjob on to take her place. This woman met privately with President Bush.....he was respectful...he hugged her...but she is convinced that he doesn't care one bit about all the death and destruction HE caused. Oh, and the Iraqi people have no freedom...we're building military bases there....excuse me while I go bash my head against the wall....


435 posted on 08/10/2005 5:12:57 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Cindy backed out so O'Reilly decides to put up a clone of her. I turned it off.


436 posted on 08/10/2005 5:13:08 PM PDT by hipaatwo (Thinking of a good tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Well, Bill dug another one up---she is talking about President Bush like Sheehan, sorta...

She just said that when Bush met her, he walked up NOSE to NOSE, and said "I'm George Bush, President of the United States, and I understand you have something to say to me"...

Then, she said he had the nerve to try to explain WHY he went to war in Iraq....and then ASKED if he could hug her...

She said she let him hug her, BUT, she looked in his eyes and "could tell their is NO CONCSIENCE there...none!
437 posted on 08/10/2005 5:13:37 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Free Republic is #1!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

"OK...who is THIS woman who O'Reilly has on? Elaine Chesterson. She sounds to me like she has been coopted by the same moonbat group."

I have no idea. Never watch BOR.


438 posted on 08/10/2005 5:13:39 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Yes, and she claimed that the President got right in her face and went "nose to nose" with her and said "I'm George Bush, President of the United States and I understand that you have something to say to me".

Then her story got very vague about what actually was said.

O'R is asking her more questions........

439 posted on 08/10/2005 5:13:56 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: jdm; A. Pole
Was wondering how FReepers defined the word.

I'd sum up neocon by saying they seem socially liberal and fiscally conservative.

And I'd say they care less for the nation state and its borders and more for industrializing the entire world to make business more efficient.

To paraphrase Karl Marx (with whom the neocons seem to often bear a kind of resemblance) . . .

. . . the neocon motto might be,

"Buy from each country according to its industries, sell to each country according to its needs."

I suspect that some neocons see the nation state, like America, as an outdated concept, to be replaced by globalism.

440 posted on 08/10/2005 5:14:10 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 981-1,000 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson