Posted on 07/28/2005 8:13:58 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
Ayes | Noes | PRES | NV | |
Republican | 202 | 27 | 2 | |
Democratic | 15 | 187 | ||
Independent | 1 | |||
TOTALS | 217 | 215 | 2 |
Aderholt Akin Alexander Bachus Baker Barrett (SC) Bartlett (MD) Barton (TX) Bass Bean Beauprez Biggert Bilirakis Bishop (UT) Blackburn Blunt Boehlert Boehner Bonilla Bonner Bono Boozman Bradley (NH) Brady (TX) Brown (SC) Brown-Waite, Ginny Burgess Burton (IN) Buyer Calvert Camp Cannon Cantor Carter Castle Chabot Chocola Cole (OK) Conaway Cooper Cox Crenshaw Cuellar Culberson Cunningham Davis (KY) Davis, Tom Deal (GA) DeLay Dent Diaz-Balart, L. Diaz-Balart, M. Dicks Doolittle Drake Dreier Duncan Ehlers Emerson English (PA) Everett Feeney Ferguson Fitzpatrick (PA) Flake Foley Forbes Fortenberry Fossella Franks (AZ) Frelinghuysen Gallegly Gerlach |
Gibbons Gilchrest Gillmor Gingrey Gohmert Goodlatte Granger Graves Green (WI) Hall Harris Hart Hastert Hastings (WA) Hayes Hayworth Hefley Hensarling Herger Hinojosa Hobson Hoekstra Hulshof Hyde Inglis (SC) Issa Istook Jefferson Jenkins Johnson (CT) Johnson (IL) Johnson, Sam Keller Kelly Kennedy (MN) King (IA) King (NY) Kingston Kirk Kline Knollenberg Kolbe Kuhl (NY) LaHood Latham LaTourette Leach Lewis (CA) Lewis (KY) Linder Lucas Lungren, Daniel E. Manzullo Marchant Matheson McCaul (TX) McCrery McKeon McMorris Meeks (NY) Mica Miller (FL) Miller, Gary Moore (KS) Moran (KS) Moran (VA) Murphy Musgrave Myrick Neugebauer Northup Nunes Nussle |
Ortiz Osborne Oxley Pearce Pence Peterson (PA) Petri Pickering Pitts Platts Poe Pombo Porter Price (GA) Pryce (OH) Putnam Radanovich Ramstad Regula Reichert Renzi Reynolds Rogers (AL) Rogers (KY) Rogers (MI) Rohrabacher Ros-Lehtinen Royce Ryan (WI) Ryun (KS) Saxton Schwarz (MI) Sensenbrenner Sessions Shadegg Shaw Shays Sherwood Shimkus Shuster Skelton Smith (TX) Snyder Sodrel Souder Stearns Sullivan Sweeney Tanner Terry Thomas Thornberry Tiahrt Tiberi Towns Turner Upton Walden (OR) Walsh Wamp Weldon (FL) Weldon (PA) Weller Westmoreland Whitfield Wicker Wilson (NM) Wilson (SC) Wolf Young (AK) Young (FL) |
Abercrombie Ackerman Allen Andrews Baca Baird Baldwin Barrow Becerra Berkley Berman Berry Bishop (GA) Bishop (NY) Blumenauer Boren Boswell Boucher Boustany Boyd Brady (PA) Brown (OH) Brown, Corrine Butterfield Capito Capps Capuano Cardin Cardoza Carnahan Carson Case Chandler Clay Cleaver Clyburn Coble Conyers Costa Costello Cramer Crowley Cubin Cummings Davis (AL) Davis (CA) Davis (FL) Davis (IL) Davis (TN) DeFazio DeGette Delahunt DeLauro Dingell Doggett Doyle Edwards Emanuel Engel Eshoo Etheridge Evans Farr Fattah Filner Ford Foxx Frank (MA) Garrett (NJ) Gonzalez Goode Gordon |
Green, Al Green, Gene Grijalva Gutierrez Gutknecht Harman Hastings (FL) Herseth Higgins Hinchey Holden Holt Honda Hooley Hostettler Hoyer Hunter Inslee Israel Jackson (IL) Jackson-Lee (TX) Jindal Johnson, E. B. Jones (NC) Jones (OH) Kanjorski Kaptur Kennedy (RI) Kildee Kilpatrick (MI) Kind Kucinich Langevin Lantos Larsen (WA) Larson (CT) Lee Levin Lewis (GA) Lipinski LoBiondo Lofgren, Zoe Lowey Lynch Mack Maloney Markey Marshall Matsui McCarthy McCollum (MN) McCotter McDermott McGovern McHenry McHugh McIntyre McKinney McNulty Meehan Meek (FL) Melancon Menendez Michaud Millender-McDonald Miller (MI) Miller (NC) Miller, George Mollohan Moore (WI) Murtha Nadler |
Napolitano Neal (MA) Ney Norwood Oberstar Obey Olver Otter Owens Pallone Pascrell Pastor Paul Payne Pelosi Peterson (MN) Pomeroy Price (NC) Rahall Rangel Rehberg Reyes Ross Rothman Roybal-Allard Ruppersberger Rush Ryan (OH) Sabo Salazar Sánchez, Linda T. Sanchez, Loretta Sanders Schakowsky Schiff Schwartz (PA) Scott (GA) Scott (VA) Serrano Sherman Simmons Simpson Slaughter Smith (NJ) Smith (WA) Solis Spratt Stark Strickland Stupak Tancredo Tauscher Taylor (MS) Thompson (CA) Thompson (MS) Tierney Udall (CO) Udall (NM) Van Hollen Velázquez Visclosky Wasserman Schultz Waters Watson Watt Waxman Weiner Wexler Woolsey Wu Wynn |
Davis, Jo Ann |
Taylor (NC) |
Russia has prtective trade laws and their economy is growing at a bout 10% per year for the last few years.
Oy veh...they also had 100% employment under the communist regime. They are much more open now than they were before.
Not a strawman, you just gave the exact same list of reasons why this would be good as the promoters of "free trade" with China gives
Baffled!
find later
don't understand the post.
LOL.. Explain to me how **FARMERS** were unable to **FEED** their families because of NAFTA.
I can't wait to hear this one... and I'll revert to my previous statement.. "I'm simply stunned at the ignorance of economics and history on here"
I'm not a "free trader". I happen to think that "free trade" is a great idea in theory, but will never work in practice. It follows the same model as pure democracy or pure capitalism.
If individual rights are protected, then tariffs, and revenue generated by tariffs are welcome.
If corporate "rights" (these are not officially recognized by the Constitution) are protected, then eliminating revenue generating tariffs are the name of the game.
I don't think I'm following you here. I don't think I'm talking about corporate rights, per se. I'm talking about fair trade across national borders. This should protect businesses regardless of whether they consist of one person selling fruit on a street corner, or a huge corporation. I don't think it comes down to any constitutional rights at all, it's more about protecting the security (in this case economic) of the country.
The country is made up of individuals, as are corporations. If the country's economy is suffering because of imbalance in trading practices, corporations suffer and therefore individuals suffer.
I am not talking about their communist government. I am talking about the past 5 years. They have protectionism and their economy is booming.
And this is CAFTA or NAFTA's fault?? Are you suggesting this wasn't happening before NAFTA?
Who will be able to afford to buy them? The average income for the people there is pretty low. Will we artificially lower the price of these Washington apples, so they can afford them? How will the producers of these apples make a profit selling below cost?
What else does America still produce that can be sold to these countries? Most of the goods that we consume are now made in foreign countries. Exactly what are we exporting that Chileans, Columbians, etc, want or can afford?
If I want hand crafted native artifacts, I can already get them, mostly at the swapmeet : (
Understood, but that really has nothing to do with CAFTA.
Sickening, isn't it? Talk about lockstep march into the abyss, by the GOP. Let's not forget that the Dems voted against this enmasse, just because the President wants it. I would like for his head to be examined at this point.
If Clinton wanted this, the roll call would be the absolute opposite.
Well yes it does. The CAFTA is enabling legislation. Just look at all the side agreements that are now part of the CAFTA. There will be more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.