Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAFTA live debate/vote thread
C-SPAN | July 27, 2005 | U.S. House of Representatives

Posted on 07/27/2005 5:42:46 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-764 next last
To: You Dirty Rats
Don't forget Ron Paul was in on it also

He's up now, his 30 page mini-novel of why he voted no will be out tomorrow.

41 posted on 07/27/2005 6:27:51 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

what percentage of Boeing aricraft come in as subassemblies from foreign countries? will that percentage increase, or decrease, in the coming years? ask yourself the same question regarding auto manufacturing. how long then, before Boeing's US operations simply consist of executives, management, and sales and marketing? you can apply the same to HP, blowing their white collar technology staffs away, already having moved manufacturing offshore. Great for them, great for their stockholders - and the workers who rely on Boeing and HP for their middle class jobs?


42 posted on 07/27/2005 6:28:02 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

Funny thing is that CAFTA is really not very important by itself. The countries involved are tiny compared to Mexico, much less the United States. The 'Rats see this as an opportunity to embarass the President and the protectionists see this as a chance to end any future free trade agreement.


43 posted on 07/27/2005 6:28:04 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Did he really just claim that the Bill will take away Flintstone's Chewables without a prescription?


44 posted on 07/27/2005 6:29:29 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

lol


45 posted on 07/27/2005 6:30:18 PM PDT by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Here's a good article about the sugar barons opposition.

CAFTA: Big Sugar, Big Lies

46 posted on 07/27/2005 6:30:23 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Protect what? Minimum wage jobs in the US like the textile industry who employ non HS graduates and whose products cost 3-4 times than they should. Why would we want to protect jobs like those? We should be aiming higher for ourselves.


47 posted on 07/27/2005 6:31:09 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Sugar lost to bananas on this deal.


48 posted on 07/27/2005 6:31:30 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Did he(Ron Paul) really just claim that the Bill will take away Flintstone's Chewables without a prescription?

Basically, yes.

49 posted on 07/27/2005 6:31:51 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut
10.16.3 says no such thing. You're either repeating or creating an utter falsehood, or creating it outright.

And you're spinning 10.5.2.

I think you're reading some crap article and repeating their spin instead of looking at the agreement for yourself.

Admit it. You haven't read the agreement. You just subscribe to a someone who does your thinking for you on CAFTA.

50 posted on 07/27/2005 6:32:44 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dane; You Dirty Rats

My husband had to turn it to another channel when Ron Paul was up there. How did explain that one about the vitamins? How does that relate to the bill?


51 posted on 07/27/2005 6:33:15 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

""what percentage of Boeing aricraft come in as subassemblies from foreign countries?""


What percent of airbus, toyota, mercedes, nissan, Komatsu is made in the USA???

EADS has a large planet at the mobile airport, all the above mentioned companies have large and growing facilites in the Southern USA. Being a Southern, I dont subscribe to your "manufacturing is dying" BS


52 posted on 07/27/2005 6:34:05 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

Reuters: "The White House has a harder time rounding up votes for CAFTA than for any other recent trade pact because of stiff opposition from many Republicans in textile and sugar-producing states who fear it will cause job losses."

Me: I'm all for cheaper sugar and clothes.


53 posted on 07/27/2005 6:34:43 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

If you're against CAFTA you're misinformed.


54 posted on 07/27/2005 6:35:38 PM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats are motivated mainly and perhaps almost wholly by envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade

OH GOD, it's bad enough we have Sonovich and DeWanker in Ohio, now Stephanie Tubbs Jones is up. At least we have Rob Portman.


55 posted on 07/27/2005 6:35:51 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: marajade

Ron Paul claims CAFTA will require presciptions for Vitamins.


56 posted on 07/27/2005 6:36:45 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (WE WILL WIN WITH W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All

Nafta, Cafta, Shafta?


57 posted on 07/27/2005 6:36:49 PM PDT by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: marajade

Why? Because he is a conservative that doesnt let the WSJ op ed pages or Limbaugh do the thinking for him. He is one of the very last mainstreet style Conservatives(even though he was registered Libertarian in the late 80s) left in congress


58 posted on 07/27/2005 6:37:25 PM PDT by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

I really don't think many people want to talk about our constitution. Most want to talk about 80% of 10%. </sarcasm>


59 posted on 07/27/2005 6:37:39 PM PDT by texastoo ("trash the treaties")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

To be honest I haven't read the bill but how is he claiming that?


60 posted on 07/27/2005 6:37:50 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-764 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson