Posted on 07/27/2005 9:22:57 AM PDT by smoothsailing
Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution
By Henry Mark Holzer
FrontPageMagazine.com
July 27, 2005
United States Senator "Chuck" Schumer's broke his own stupidity record the other day following President Bush's announcement of John Roberts nomination to the Supreme Court.
In a tag-team appearance with Senator Pat Leahy (D. Vt.), ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committee, Schumer confessed to the Nation that neither he, Leahy, nor the Democrat party for whom he spoke, understands a fundamental principle of American constitutionalism: separation of powers. Indeed, ever since Schumer confessed, his echo has been heard as Democrat functionaries (e.g., Kennedy, Biden, Durbin, Pelosi) have made the same confession that they, too, do not understand one of the three basic pillars upon which our Republic stands.
All of them, and for that matter most of the media, have been demanding that judicial nominee Roberts "answer questions." That Roberts explain his position on abortion, that he reveal where he stands on affirmative action, that he disclose how he would rule on capital punishment, that he divulge his stand on eminent domainthat, in effect, he make known the platform on which he is running for a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States.
From the perspective of the Democrats, this is entirely understandable, even defensiblebecause they do not understand Separation of Powers, and thus the Constitution's mandated role for a judge in the American system of government, believing instead that the judiciary is simply another political branch. The Democrats see judgesWarren, Brennan, Douglas, Blackmun, Stevens, Ginsburgas legislators, promulgating from the bench their own social, economic, and even moral, programs, not interpreting the Constitution and laws passed by the politically accountable actual legislature, i.e., Congress.
John Roberts is not a candidate for the Nowhereville Town Council, where the voters would want to know (and would have a right to know) where he stands on building a new senior citizen center, or whether Walmart can open a superstore. He is not even running for a senate seat in Vermont, where voters have questions about dairy subsidies, or in New York, where Long Islanders want to know about shore erosion.
He is a nominee to a judgeship where his task is not to legislate (Article I of the Constitution), but rather to serve under Article III: "The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . . ." That "judicial power" is the power to interpret and apply the Constitution and laws promulgated not by judges, but by legislators.
It is bad enough that the Democrats don'tor won'tunderstand this, but apparently they've succeeded in selling their bogus view of American constitutionalism to the American people. Last Friday, the Associated Press reported that "Just over half of all Americansand a solid majority of womenwant to know John Roberts' position on abortion . . . ." Not just the "pro-choice" side, but also those who oppose abortion.
The fact is that no one is entitled to know what John Roberts thinks about abortionor gay marriage, capital punishment, gun control, self-incrimination, free speech, warrantless searches, compulsory process, the commerce clauseor the price of tea in China.
The Judiciary Committee and the full Senate are entitled to know from President Bush's nominee for an Associate Justiceship on the Supreme Court of the United States basically one thing: what does John Roberts believe is the constitutional function of courts in general, and the Supreme Court in particularand of the judges who sit on those courts.
Until the Republicans extricate themselves from the judges-as-legislators mindset the Democrats have engineeredand in the process educate the American people about Separation of Powers, as the doctrine applies to John Robertsthey are playing the Democrats' game, and perhaps holding a losing hand.
Another political dipsh*t who doesn't know his a** from a hole in the ground yet is elected to office to govern everyone else. Does anyone else see something amiss here?
When Al D'Amato called him a p*tzhead, Schumer never denied it!
Powerful article, one of the best I've read.
ping
As the article says very well, these guys don't understand the Constitution.
Oh, they understand it. They just don't care...
I do believe this is the first time that Chuckie's ever told the truth.
Seems like that should have been obvious. Never been outside of NYC or the Beltway. What do you expect?
**Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution**
The what is he doing in Congress let alone on the Judiciary Committee?
New Yorkers, unelect him!
I have heard Biden, Reid, and Schumer all say in the last month or so, that the reason it is so important to get the "right" Supreme Court justice is because the Supreme Court MAKES LAW!!!
Yeppers...they all said it...I noted it...and laughed!
what does John Roberts believe is the constitutional function of courts in general, and the Supreme Court in particularand of the judges who sit on those courts.
Until the Republicans extricate themselves from the judges-as-legislators mindset the Democrats have engineeredand in the process educate the American people about Separation of Powers, as the doctrine applies to John Robertsthey are playing the Democrats' game, and perhaps holding a losing hand.
Well said and entirely correct!
The jackasses don't understand ANY of it.
YIKES!
All nationally elected officials should have to take a proctored comprehensive test on the Constitution and pass with 90% or better in order to be put on the ticket.
Wonder how many could pass the written test imigrants have to pass to become citizens? I venture to say we would be shocked.
He doesn't have very nice legs either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.