Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer Confesses to Not Understanding Constitution
Front Page Mgazine ^ | 07/27/05 | Henry Mark Holzer

Posted on 07/27/2005 9:22:57 AM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: smoothsailing

You will note that he continually refers to our government as a democracy.


61 posted on 07/27/2005 11:19:42 AM PDT by Banjoguy (Tony Stuart : POS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Well said. I'll tell you one thing, since becoming a FR addict and political/news junkie, I have learned that "Senator" does not mean intelligent and definitely does not mean honest. So many are arrogant, self-centered and just plain stupid, e.g., Boxer, Biden, Murray, Cantwell, Durbin etc. I shudder when I think of the power they yield...


62 posted on 07/27/2005 11:21:20 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rattrap
I'd be willing to bet about 90% of our representatives don't understand the constitution no matter what side of the aisle.

True. I heard Senator Kay Baily Hutchison - (R) being interviewed on a radio station in San Antonio. She was totally clueless about what the Constitution said or meant.

63 posted on 07/27/2005 11:37:26 AM PDT by Tolkien (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

"I shudder when I think of the power they yield..."

You mean "wield." They would never yield one iota of their power, real or imaginary......


64 posted on 07/27/2005 11:37:58 AM PDT by SpinyNorman (Liberals are enablers for terrorists and other anti-American groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

That "judicial power" is the power to interpret and apply the Constitution and laws promulgated not by judges, but by legislators.


65 posted on 07/27/2005 11:40:24 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (http://www.busateripens.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It's an idiotic title. Schumer might very well have said something that indicates he doesn't understand the constitution, but there's no admission. An admission would be a quote like "I don't understand the separation of powers."


66 posted on 07/27/2005 11:41:58 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

The reason he calls it a democracy is because the dumba** doesn't know what a republic really is. What a pair he and fat Teddy make together!


67 posted on 07/27/2005 11:42:23 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman

Re#64 LOL. Nice catch. I'd call that a reverse Freudian slip where wishful thinking controlled my fingers...


68 posted on 07/27/2005 11:43:39 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Of course it is.The writer used it to get our attention.
69 posted on 07/27/2005 12:01:45 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Yeah,I noticed that.I live in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and you can only imagine how many folks here refer this as a state.


70 posted on 07/27/2005 12:05:46 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

..could be wishful thinking.


71 posted on 07/27/2005 1:11:18 PM PDT by Banjoguy (Tony Stuart : POS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

For all practical purposes, in the case of Pennsylvania being a commonwealth, there is no operational significance but in the case of a democracy versus a republic, there is a huge operational difference.


72 posted on 07/27/2005 1:14:55 PM PDT by Banjoguy (Tony Stuart : POS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"The Judiciary Committee and the full Senate are entitled to know from President Bush's nominee for an Associate Justiceship on the Supreme Court of the United States basically one thing: what does John Roberts believe is the constitutional function of courts in general, and the Supreme Court in particular—and of the judges who sit on those courts."

Mr. Holzer might have suggested one other thing the Judiciary Committe and full Senate, as well as 'We, the People,' are entitled to know from this or any nominee.

That critically important thing is: what does John Roberts believe to be the meaning of Article V of the United States Constitution and how does he believe that provision applies to the Supreme Court and sitting judges, the Senate and Congress (legislative branch), and the Executive branch?

By his answer, all citizens will be able to discern what he believes to be the meaning of the term "living constitution."

Clue:

"Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon them collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption or even knowledge of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives [the executive, judiciary, or legislature]; in a departure from it prior to such an act." - Alexander Hamilton

73 posted on 07/27/2005 1:48:42 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Leahy reminds me of someone's big dumb older brother jockhead. Dumb as a post but can sure heave that ball. Currently battling Barbara Boxer for the annual Senate Mensa award...after perennial winner Al Gore returned the trophy when he left Capitol Hill.

Go BOXER/Hillary in 08!


74 posted on 07/27/2005 1:52:52 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

I also favor drug and alcohol testing and bans against legislating while drunk...


75 posted on 07/27/2005 1:54:58 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

There are weasels on both sides of the aisle...


76 posted on 07/27/2005 2:02:03 PM PDT by metesky (This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
That "judicial power" is the power to interpret and apply the Constitution and laws promulgated not by judges, but by legislators.

I'd not use the word "interpret", but would just leave it apply, with the respect to the Constitution. It's not a document written by and for lawyers. It's language is simple and either proscriptive or prohibitive. The only place where it may need a bit of "interpretation", and I'd prefer some other word, would be to determine the original meaning of those terms of art, which were thought to be self explanatory, such as "Freedom of the Press, Freedom of speech, and so forth". (I would not include "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" in that list of terms of art that need clarification, it's perfectly understandable with nothing more than a dictionary of the time, if that)

77 posted on 07/27/2005 2:19:05 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy
Correct.

My point,poorly articulated,was the loss of proper meaning in our language.

78 posted on 07/27/2005 2:21:32 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: loveliberty2
Certainly an appropriate and important question.Glad you posted.

One of the best benefits of FR is the opportunity it provides for learning.I've learned from you today,ll2,and I appreciate it.

79 posted on 07/27/2005 2:31:50 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

bump


80 posted on 07/27/2005 3:26:24 PM PDT by perfect stranger ("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson