Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veteran of Iraq, Running in Ohio, Is Harsh on Bush
NY Times ^ | July 27, 2005 | JAMES DAO

Posted on 07/26/2005 11:33:15 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
"The Democratic Party is wrong on this," he said. "We don't want government dictating a woman's right to choose. How do I tell people it's O.K. to dictate their gun ownership?"

This gyrene could be a real fly in the ointment.

1 posted on 07/26/2005 11:33:16 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Political Junkie Too

ping


2 posted on 07/26/2005 11:38:41 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He fits right in with Hillary and the new demoRAT "Centrist" party. Not !


3 posted on 07/26/2005 11:54:07 PM PDT by John Lenin (Hillary Clinton: Voted 6th most evil person of the last millennium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Didn't John Kerry serve as well? McCain endured a North Vietnamese prison cell, but I wouldn't take his word for anything. Heck, wasn't Benedict Arnold one of our bravest commanders, right up until his final treason?

Bravery doesn't innoculate you from stupidity.
4 posted on 07/26/2005 11:56:14 PM PDT by farmer18th ("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

He is against parental notification, for partial birth abortion, he is for raising social security taxes.

Besides gun rights he is a typical liberal democrat. He uses the dem talking points on iraq that it was a diversion.

The Ohio dem party needs an ass kicking for the charade they put on in the recount. They are sore losers, the whole bunch of them from kucinich to marcy kuptur to sherrod brown what a classless party.


5 posted on 07/26/2005 11:56:46 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You would never guess that from watching his TV commercials... I've only seen one, (it is repeatedly constantly) and it shows one of the President's speeches, then seques into Hackett talking about how the President inspired him to serve a tour of duty in Iraq.

But in reality, he doesn't agree with the President at all...

I haven't seen one ad from Jean Schmidt yet... perhaps her polls show her so far out in front that she doesn't need to advertise...

6 posted on 07/26/2005 11:57:48 PM PDT by carton253 (It's better to have a gun and not need it than not have a gun and need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
calling President Bush a "chicken hawk"

Calling the President a child molester is a new, vile low for democrats.

7 posted on 07/27/2005 12:07:55 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: vanbc

Paul L. Hackett: calling President Bush a "chicken hawk" for not serving in Vietnam and harshly criticizing the decision to invade Iraq.

The term "chicken hawk" is completely ignorant. After all, does one have to join the police to expect the bank to be protected?

It's a dullards lame argument.


9 posted on 07/27/2005 12:20:22 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

is this guy frank lautenberg's adopted son?


10 posted on 07/27/2005 12:47:23 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Especially since W *did* volunteer for VN duty.

It's not his fault that the USAF won air superiority, so that the type of plane he flew was no longer needed!


11 posted on 07/27/2005 12:47:35 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He didn't avoid serving in Nam, or use his family's influence...

He chose a more dangerous mission..

If the Soviets launched their bombers (when he served the bulk of the Soviet nuclear arsenal), the plan was to send our interceptors to catch them over the bering strait and the air space between there and the lower 48 states, and splash them into the ocean there before any substantial damage could be done.. If you had to eject, your life expectency in the polar north pacific was 3-5 minutes, AT MOST....

LETS MAKE IT CLEAR TO THE LEFT, HE CHOSE A MORE DANGEROUS MISSION--THAN BEING SHOT AT IN THE MEKONG DELTA or phantom trips to Cambodia that nobody knows about... That he did not have to actually splash any Soviet bombers is irrelevant, that was their job if the time came...


12 posted on 07/27/2005 12:57:25 AM PDT by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote" Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vanbc; ncountylee
Urban Dictionary
13 posted on 07/27/2005 12:58:12 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Schwaeky

Paul Hackett talks like he lead troops in combat in Iraq.

Granted anywhere in Iraq is dangerous and you are always suseptible to an IED but Hackett was a civil affairs officer he makes it like he was an infantry soldier.


14 posted on 07/27/2005 1:42:47 AM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

He'll get his ass kicked, and then be the new Max Cleland Poster Boy for the 'rats. What a maroon.


15 posted on 07/27/2005 1:54:04 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; RaceBannon; IGOTMINE; patton; Squantos; xzins
harshly criticizing the decision to invade Iraq... [u]ntil four months ago, he was serving in the Marines, commanding a civil affairs unit in Iraq.

Apparently publicly selling out your fellow servicemembers upon return from combat duty is an immediate qualification for office in the Dem party.

16 posted on 07/27/2005 4:12:20 AM PDT by Coop (www.heroesandtraitors.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

I'll not question the service of anyone who commanded troops in Iraq; especially a SpecOps unit.

I am from this district in Ohio, and I will not vote for Hackett for the same reason as I'd not vote for any liberal, but there is (at present) absolutely no negative information about his command time.

I have no problem with any civilian citizen disagreeing with the WAY a war is conducted. I have problems with soldiers speaking publicly against decisions that have been made...their job is to salute the flagpole and carry on.

I have problems with civilians who attempt to undermine their nation's direction by betraying the soldiers who are faithfully fighting that war for them.

Personally, I believe the war in Iraq is a just war, is a necessary war, and will be seen, once we win, as a history-changing war, settling the long islamo-fascist designs toward world domination.


17 posted on 07/27/2005 4:38:35 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
The Ohio dem party needs an ass kicking for...

This Dem's comment calling Prez a "chickenhawk" really ticks me off.

President Bush DID serve bravely, perhaps as bravely as some soldier who commanded a civilian brigade, or whatever it was he did in Iraq.

18 posted on 07/27/2005 4:41:15 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"...commanding a civil affairs unit in Iraq. ...a 43-year-old lawyer..." Those words alone speak volumes. He's a stinkin lieburral lawyer. That's about all you need to know. A "civil affairs unit" commander is a looonnnngg way from a Spec Ops commander.
19 posted on 07/27/2005 4:45:03 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (So I took the $250,000 and bought chairs for the standing army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Civil Affairs, Psyops, Aviation, SF, Ranger, Delta, etc. are all units under the Special Operations command. Go to the following or other USASOC links:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/ca-psyop.htm

A Civil Affairs unit would have been working directly with the Iraqis working on assistance to the population and on intel. The Units of the Civil Affairs & PsyOps Command are:

Units
4th PSYOP GP (AR)
96th Civil Affairs Battalion (Airborne)
Reserve Units
2nd PSYOP GP (AR)
7th PSYOP GP (AR)


350th CA Command
351st CA Command
352nd CA Command
353rd CA Command


361st CA Brigade


412th CA Battalion
451st CA Battalion
Facilities
Fort Bragg, NC


20 posted on 07/27/2005 4:53:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson