Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

He didn't avoid serving in Nam, or use his family's influence...

He chose a more dangerous mission..

If the Soviets launched their bombers (when he served the bulk of the Soviet nuclear arsenal), the plan was to send our interceptors to catch them over the bering strait and the air space between there and the lower 48 states, and splash them into the ocean there before any substantial damage could be done.. If you had to eject, your life expectency in the polar north pacific was 3-5 minutes, AT MOST....

LETS MAKE IT CLEAR TO THE LEFT, HE CHOSE A MORE DANGEROUS MISSION--THAN BEING SHOT AT IN THE MEKONG DELTA or phantom trips to Cambodia that nobody knows about... That he did not have to actually splash any Soviet bombers is irrelevant, that was their job if the time came...


12 posted on 07/27/2005 12:57:25 AM PDT by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote" Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Schwaeky

Paul Hackett talks like he lead troops in combat in Iraq.

Granted anywhere in Iraq is dangerous and you are always suseptible to an IED but Hackett was a civil affairs officer he makes it like he was an infantry soldier.


14 posted on 07/27/2005 1:42:47 AM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson