Posted on 07/26/2005 10:05:41 PM PDT by Sam Hill
Home | Project Activities | Writing & Interviews | Press Coverage |
For Immediate Release
September 22, 2004
Frank Grevils press contact is: Tom Clark tclark@tiscali.dk
home (+45) 4444 1343
work (+45) 4452 6447
mobile (+45) 4095 0574 or (+45) 6062 1763
We, the undersigned citizens of the United States and the United Kingdom, have recently come to learn of the criminal proceedings against our Danish fellow truth-teller, Mr. Frank Grevil.
As his case has been presented to us, Mr. Grevil is formally being accused of leaking three classified threat assessments to a Danish newspaper in January/February 2004, in order to substantiate claims made verbatim to the same newspaper. These documents demonstrated that his employer at the time, the Danish Defense Intelligence Service, provided unbalanced intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction prior to the decision of the Danish Parliament to join the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" in March 2003. These documents also showed how the Servicedue to its lack of sourcesbased its threat assessments almost entirely upon similar assessments provided by intelligence agencies in the United States and the United Kingdom, the content of which later turned out to be based on bad intelligence and in some cases even fabricated information.
We have learned that the Danish Parliament has recently taken actions to enhance parliamentary control over the intelligence service, which are clearly attributable to Mr. Grevil's revelations. This lends great credibility to his claims, which deserve in our opinion credit for serving the public interest rather than punishment.
What Mr. Grevil has undertaken reflects in many ways what we have done in our respective countries. With this letter, we want to draw attention to the important role that unauthorized truth-telling plays in a democratic state. In our experience, the proper chain of command often does not work to correct corruption, crimes, lies, cover-ups, or incompetence within state agencies. Disclosing documents without authorization is frequently the only way to expose these abuses or to substantiate verbal allegations about them to the press.
We strongly recommend reevaluating Mr. Grevil's case on the basis that his deed was done unselfishly and conscientiously, in order to strengthen democracy, and government transparency, and true national security.
SIGNATORIES
John H. Brown, Former Foreign Service Officer
Edward Costello, Former Special Agent (Counterintelligence), Federal Bureau of Investigation
Sibel Edmonds, Former Language Specialist, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Daniel Ellsberg, Former official, U.S. Departments of Defense and State
Katharine Gun, Former translator, GCHG, UK
Larry Johnson, Former Deputy Director for Anti-Terrorism Assistance, Transportation Security, and Special Operations, Department of State, Office of the Coordinator for Counter-Terrorism
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatowski (karen@militaryweek.com), recently retired from service in the Pentagons Office of Near East planning
Ray McGovern, Former Analyst, Central Intelligence Agency
Coleen Rowley, Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(Clarification of Coleen Rowley's Signature: "I have signed this letter in support of Danish Major Frank Grevil in my personal capacity and not as a representative of the FBI. I wish to further clarify my view that the propriety of 'unauthorized disclosures,' such as the one Major Grevil made, is limited to only the narrowest of circumstances, to dire situations involving truly unlawful, unconstitutional or deceptive actions on the part of higher government officials entailing life and death consequences, for example, the My Lai massacre or the Abu Ghraib torture incidents. In less serious situations, I believe that the proper and most constructive way of bringing concerns and problems to light is through chain of command and other institutional mechanisms such as Inspector Generals.")
Philip G. Vargas, Ph.D., J.D., Former Director, Privacy & Confidentiality Study, Commission on Federal Paperwork
Ann Wright, Retired Army Reserve Colonel, Former Deputy Ambassador, Mongolia
Maybe that's all it was.
OTOH there was the murder of the Starbucks (former) intern and the two young men who worked for her at Starbucks. Mary Caitlin Mahoney known as Caity had been a WH intern who worked closely with Doris Matsui. (Think Asian money...)
Drudge posted that Spikey Mikey was spiking a story he had on WH sexual harrassment of an intern with the initial "M". IIRC Caity M. and the two young men were murdered within the week and MSM said the motive was robbery. However, her car had been disabled beforehand (to make sure she couldn't get away?) and the thief (thieves) forgot to take the money.
A lot of that sort of information was coming out and then all of a sudden the Clintons brought in Mueller and he pinned it all on some pitiful flunky and the case was "solved".
Maybe he's OK, but I just about choked when President Bush appointed him head of the FBI.
Very good, Sam. If these people are going to campaign all over the World to get people to break the law, then I see no reason why we can't show to the World what they are doing.
Kwiatkowski is another crazy among the signatories. A net needs to be thrown over this whole gang.
A question. If these people have so much information and so many inside sources, why do they repeatedly implore other agents to help them out?
And I'd be willing to bet that Valerie Plame had been a source at one time.
There is no such title, Deputy Ambassador. It is Deputy Chief of Mission (DCM). If Wright provided that title, she is an idiot beyond signing the letter.
"Is she not the one who got the terrorist coming in at the Canada/US border to bomb LAX? I may be all wet .. she may be the one who was nagging her superiors about Moussaoui's activities..."
I don't think she had anything to do with the LAX story. But yes, she reportedly sent some memo to Mueller in which she supposedly alerted him to some suspicious terrorist activities.
As I recall, the memo was vastly overblown. It was almost impossible to read. Not to mention the fact that that is not quite the way to get things done. That is, if you think you know something, you don't send an email to the head man (or CEO) and expect instant action.
Here's a Time Magazine article about her FBI Memo:
TIME Magazine: The Bombshell Memo
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020603/memo.html
Yeah, the hypocrisy of these people is evident. They whine about national security laws being broken, while advocating that people break the national security laws. But what's truly "strange" is that no one in the media will call them on it.
You mean this one? ---
Additionally, he has been decorated as a Commander in the Order of the Equatorial Star by the Government of Gabon and as an Admiral in the El Paso Navy by the El Paso County Commissioners.
"the ACLU stands ready to provide pro bono legal counsel"
Yeah, the ACLU stands ready to help Gitmo inmates, too. I didn't know that breaking the law, as is advocated in this letter, was now a "civil liberty". The ACLU really is in the hands of left-wing nuts.
Underlying all these "appeals for truth telling" is the Wilson/Plame meme that the intelligence was cooked. Could these two have had anything to do with this?
"Additionally, he has been decorated as a Commander in the Order of the Equatorial Star by the Government of Gabon and as an Admiral in the El Paso Navy by the El Paso County Commissioners."
Maybe we should call him Admiral Joe Wilson--the fourth.
What a complete pompous ass.
"Underlying all these "appeals for truth telling" is the Wilson/Plame meme that the intelligence was cooked. Could these two have had anything to do with this?"
They certainly have been used to promote the theory. I wouldn't be surprised if Wilson didn't make up his story to fit this campaign.
But it's really an old charge--for all wars. It's been a favorite of the American-haters we have here, since their glory days of the Vietnam War.
What I love about them is their implicit but constant claim that only they know the true facts. But notice that they never list any facts. Nada. Zilch. They don't know a damn thing.
Most of them haven't been near any "intelligence" for more than twenty years.
"Why are they butting into something in Denmark?"
Think about what they are doing. They are advocating that someone in Denmark violate Danish law. Maybe they can be extradited to Denmark. Suits me ;-)
ppaul posted a link to a series titled "The Terrorist Within" on 6/24/04. This was the (surprisingly!)terrific series on Ahmed Ressam, the millenium bomber, published by the Seattle Times.
The key info on the Immigration officer is in chapter 12...but if you have time to read it, it is a real eye opener on how the Clinton Administration had NOTHING to do with breaking this case.
Outing intel? It's what the left has always been about. And using same to line their own bloody pockets and knowing who and where to invest. Of course the rank and file lefties don't understand this.
Just looked at your profile .... where have you been, Sam?
You just joined 2 weeks ago....were you here previously under another name?
I've been around before, but I've lost my name and sign-in info.
This Wilson business got me riled up enough to sign up again.
Welcome back ;).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.