Vandals Set Flags, Soldier's Family's Car On Fire

WCPO TV ^ | 7/24/2005 | Becky Freemal

[GoBucks2002]

Are any of you big enough to admit you were WRONG to jump to premature, unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions?

I would be interested in knowing what their motivations were. Plenty of teens have strong opinions on the war in Iraq. Nearly every high school kid I knew became convinced last year that Kerry had to win because Bush was going to draft them.

Now where did they get THAT idea? Perhaps from the WRONG people who spread around ignorant slander .

[MikefromOhio]

but the vandals were a couple of juvenile delinquents:

So what? There is a thing called FUNDAMENTAL RESPECT. Apparently these kids don't have it. Neither do the Liberals. YOU do the math. Maybe these kids will grow out of it. Some do, some don't.

[MizSterious]

I'm sorry, but this makes no difference in my opinion of these weasels. What I've read on this thread is not "ignorant slander" (mind you, I haven't read every single post), but honest opinions expressed by people properly outraged at his horrible incident.

Bad enough that these dorks damaged property--far worse that they made things worse for an already grieving family. How dare they!

Jail 'em, and lose the key.

[MizSterious]

Agree with all you say. I don't care if they were 15 or 50. I don't see where the poster has any business demanding apologies from anyone here. As for "insulting conclusions"--the real insult was what those juvenile weasels did to that grieving family. A further insult was the post demanding an apology for Freepers rightly criticizing the incident.

[JRios1968]

"...but the vandals were a couple of juvenile delinquents..."

Funny, that's how a lot of the folks the Dims are courting as potential voters start out in life...need I remind you which party is behind the effort to make felons eligible to vote? And what are the odds that these two "delinquents" are public school troublemakers?

[Red6]

“The victims will get nothing and when the culprits are caught it’ll be “ahhh, It’s no big deal.” ---I said in post #47 last paragraph.

And the answer is: Ah, they’re just juveniles 13 and 15 years old, show restraint.

What exactly am I supposed to admit I was wrong on? Does it matter that they were 13 and 15? I would say you’re doing EXACTLY what I said people like you would do; rationalize and excuse it.

You liberals are all the same. You’re hypocrites, ever last one of you.

You’re against the death penalty, but if it was your wife that was raped and then murdered you’d see it different.

Prostitution should be legalized, but you’d never want your daughter to be one.

Drugs should be legalized, but you don’t want your son using them.

They should tax the rich! But you don’t consider yourself that.

Give us national health care! But allow me to use any Dr I want, allow me the choice and decision in prescription, provider of service etc.

You see, the liberal mind is one that is “conveniently” liberal as long as it fits into their personal best interest. It’s in reality a way of thinking that is WITHOUT responsibility for your fellow man and own actions. You have done exactly what I said people like you would do - Rationalize and downplay it.

Maybe you need to tell us that these kids had a hard life, a rough upbringing? That would really convince me to be more lenient.

So, what is your answer to this problem? As a liberal, it will be hard for you to stay focused. Don’t attack me, I didn’t burn a flag under a pregnant woman’s car whose husband just deceased. Now, what should we do with these kids in your perfect world? Make them write, “I won’t burn our flag under a widows car anymore” 10 times?

Red6

[JRios1968]

Now, what should we do with these kids in your perfect world? Make them write, “I won’t burn our flag under a widows car anymore” 10 times?

That would work...but make them write it in 10-ft tall letters...in a prairie...using kids' safety scissors...in the middle of summer...without water or bathroom breaks.

[WFTR]

Are any of you big enough to admit you were WRONG to jump to premature, unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions? Are any of you willing to retract and apologize for all the ignorant slander you hurled around here about how it must have been Democrats/liberals that did it?

Where in your article does it say that these kids weren't "evil, America-hating liberals?" Where does it say that they weren't either liberals or Democrats? I never really believed that there was an organized conspiracy to commit this crime, but I've always suspected that they were influenced by left-wing views on the war and the military. (With some liberals, I wouldn't be surprised by an organized effort to do this kind of thing, but if it were organized, we'd have seen more incidents already.) I asked whether anyone really believed that the kids weren't influenced by these views, and I found that people were split about 50/50 on the question.

I never did any vandalism as a teenager, so I'm not sure what kids are thinking when they do these things. However, I'd guess that there had to be something that influenced these kids to decide that of all the hurtful, stupid things that they could do, burning flags at the home of a wounded or killed veteran was the choice that they'd make. We still don't know what that influence was. I strongly suspect that if these kids had burned the gay pride flags outside the home of a homosexual activist who'd died of AIDS and the media discovered that they were from a fundamentalist Christian family, their family's religious beliefs would have been mentioned numerous times.

Bill

[stockpirate]

They haven't deleted your account yet for not understanding who trained these teens to break the law and attack the family of a dead soldier.

[Lady Jag]

Ohio Len, it is often amazingly easy to determine that someone is an idiot by reading just a few of their words.

GoBucks, tell Lenny what I mean.

[FMBass]

“Are any of you big enough to admit you were WRONG to jump to premature, unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions? Are any of you willing to retract and apologize for all the ignorant slander you hurled around here about how it must have been Democrats/liberals that did it?”

Yo, OhioLen – I see that you have been a member since 6/18/2005.
Good Luck.

[Chi-townChief]

Yeah - I'm willing to back off and reserve judgment until they state why they did it.

[Wormwood]

Oh and BTW Red6, your "lynching" comment was disgusting and totally out of bounds. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Actually, hanging in the public square is a tradition I would love to see revived.

[yooling]

Hey Lenny, What part of my post (#2 on this thread) should I apologize for? I stand by my comment. The only thing that the news story says is that the crime was perpetrated by teen-aged America-hating leftist scumbags.

[stockpirate]

Now where did they get THAT idea? Perhaps from the WRONG people who spread around ignorant slander

He resembles that remark.

[Zacs Mom]

"Are any of you big enough to admit you were WRONG to jump to premature, unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions? Are any of you willing to retract and apologize for all the ignorant slander you hurled around here about how it must have been Democrats/liberals that did it?"

Hmmmmmmm ~ you've been signed up at FR for a little over a month (6/18/05) and your profile pages reads:

"Leftist, Progressive, Liberal, Democrat.
Not a traitor, not a troll."

Yo, Mr. Leftist, Progressive, Liberal, Democrat, Not a traitor, not a troll,
if you are genuinely concerned about "unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions"; and folks being "willing to retract and apologize" for "ignorant slander" they've "hurled around" ~

Why do you notice the splinter in your brother's eye,
but do not perceive the wooden beam in your own eye?
Matthew 7

[stockpirate]

Are any of you big enough to admit you were WRONG to jump to premature, unwarranted and incredibly insulting conclusions?

I am surprised that your account has not been deleted.

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

Spineless US Senate would rather protect Hanoi Kerry
than deal with the anti war crowd.

Anyone who thinks Hanoi Kerry isn't behind the anti war crowd needs to get a clue.

It's time to support our troops and ignore the jelly fish in the US Senate!

There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate

He is there illegally!

WAKEUP AMERICA!

For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

Why is Kerry still in the US Senate?
This is in violation of
U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html

And the FBI has proof of his treason.

Hanoi Kerry Timeline of a traitor
includes FBI files

May 1970
Kerry and Julia traveled to Paris, France and met with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam (PRG), the political wing of the Vietcong, and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a "fact-finding" mission.

(U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.)

http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html

a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war,
or with any offense punishable by death,
may be tried at any time without limitation.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm#*%20843.%20ART.%2043.%20STATUTE%20OF%20LIMITATIONS

Distribute these url's!

Links to Anti Kerry sites
212 LINKS
News reports,
Viper's Vietnam Veterans Page

http://members.aol.com/ga1449ga/links/links.html


EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!

MUST SEE WEBSITE!!!!

http://www.kerrystreason.com/index.html

Full details on these url's!

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

Did you see this...?
(The 'Kerry's Promise Counter')
http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=6628
Polipundit even tells you how to install it on your own page!

Swift Boat Veteran For Truth John O'Neill Comments on Kerry's 180 'Release'
6/7/05
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418592/posts

John Kerry was dishonorably dismissed from the Navy:
(statement from lawyers there at the time)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1406760/posts

Why does Hanoi Kerry continue to refuse to sign
form SF 180 and release his military records to the public?
Sam Sewell 09 June 2005

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article4388.html

[Squantos]

Deadly force is applicable with regards to arson....be it flag or not....arson is a crime. Don't go after flag burners. Treat them as the criminal arsonists they are vs any "expression" of freedom of speech anti-american turdpolisher they propose it to be.....

Sad no one caught the cowardly criminal murdering trash in the act....