Islam has one goal: the total submission of every living human to it. It is the Terminator of memes. It will NOT stop until it has achieved its goal- or it is totally destroyed. Your choice.
That's right bayou. You and Pitts make perfect sense for dhimmis.
In other words, the same situation we have now, except worse. Much, much, much worse.Great article until he hit this part. At least Tancredo flushed out some of our nuttier posters.
-Eric
I think it's a fine idea.
Tancredo let slip what we've all been thinking, but, given his position, he should have used more discretion.
Leonard Pitts on the other hand, is just an affirmative action hire who doesn't realize that he was not hired for his brains. He was hired for how he looks in the group photographs.
And under all those names - he was right, and Leonard Pitts was wrong.
It seems to me that if we were to actually bomb Mecca and Medina, it would prove Islam is a false religion.
And under the name Dick Durbin he compared our soldiers to Nazis. Under the name Howard Dean he said he'd let UBL have his day in court while Tom DeLay and Karl Rove should go to jail without such consideration. Under the name Derrick Z. Jackson he's refered to "our despicable, cowardly killing of innocent Iraqi civilians." Under the name Molly Ivins he claimed and had to retract the "fact" that the US killed more Iraqis than Saddam. Under the name Hillary Clinton he held up a newspaper and insinuated the President of the US knew about 9-11 before it happened. Under the name David Corn he outed Valeri Plame and is the first to blame someone else for it. Under the name The New York Times, ABC and dozens of others he claimed there was nothing criminal done in the Valerie Plame story, and then demanded a member of the other political party should be fired for those same acts they said were not even worthy of further investigation. Under the name Dan Rather he invented lies about a sitting president during an election. Under the name Ron Reagan Junior (among others) he attacked Rove for criminal actions yet found nothing of interest when Sandy Berger confessed to destruction of classified materials.
I could go on, but you get the point. There sure are a lot of yahoos around, but you seem to have ignored a big ol' pile of 'em!
Mr. Pitts, your constant framing of issues in terms of
beer and alcoholic beverages indicates a serious problem.
This combined with your obvious leftist social bent and your
discrimitory remarks in regards to certain members of our society which show definite repressed hostility make you
a prime candidate for rehabilitation.
Please seek help soon, or hospitalization may be ordered
by this court.
Pitts is just an angry black man. I've never read anything by him that I could even remotely agree with.
Sounds like he's a little jealous of others success, too. They must be racist that they make about 500 times more money than him.
Their blasts here will, for the most part, kill innocent people. Why should we be prevented from answering in turn?
Just as the atomic bombs dropped on Japan prevented what would most likely been horrific casualties on both sides, who can say that a small nuke device dropped on Mecca could not produce the same result?
I am not advocating anything. Just asking some questions.
Leonard Pitts - enough said. Automatic barf alert.
Frankly, I don't think bombing Mecca would be an unreasonable retaliation for a nuclear holocaust on our soil set off by Muslim terrorists. The only thing besides their bloody faith these folks hold as valuable is their oil, and I don't think we'd commit economic suicide by bombing their oil wells.
But then I suppose we could go and liberate another Muslim country in response to the nuked US cities, and tie up the rest of our military and remaining resources so that China could start an aggression against us while we're still dropping like flies from the radiation.
I wonder if people really understand that Tancredo was asked for a possible, (as in NOT A DEFINATE), response to a massive Islamic attack against multiple American cities using nuclear weapons, which would almost certainly mean that hundreds of thousands or millions of Americans would have been murdered in one fell swoop of the Islamic scimitar? What in blue blazes is everyone's problem with his response, is it fear?
Me thinks you protest much;)
For the most part, Leonard is a good boy but every now and then he fancies himself somewhat of a pundit and he unleashes his sling in the last-known trajectory of a soft target.
Most times he misses, his bosses move his desk a bit farther from the window and he goes back to his sandbox.
I doubt that Tancredo has ever been concerned with the perpetually disaffected and I doubt that he is any wiser of his own fall from popularity that Mr. Pitts is.
Old Leonard did have one good column in his career:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/2001-09-12-1.html
Host Pat Campbell had asked how we should respond if U.S. cities are ever struck by terrorists using nuclear devices."
Kill them all
Muslims would hate us with renewed fervor
What muslims?
Actually, you don't need to give any thought to the ramifications of such an action, because they should be self-evident to anyone smarter than the average hamster."
Where does this leave LEONARD PITTS and bayourod?
One out of six is a pretty dismal performance for a 'religion' which removes your head if you don't join up and removes your head if you quit. My guess is that ninety percent of those whose misfortune it was to be born into Islam would walk away tomorrow if they did not fear for their lives and the lives of their families. Islam is a criminal enterprise tenuously held together by the preponderance of ignorance and the threat of violence.