[upchuck]

So, how many terrorist nuclear devices must be detonated in the US before we decide to get serious about eliminating, once and for all, the Islamic terrorists?

Their blasts here will, for the most part, kill innocent people. Why should we be prevented from answering in turn?

Just as the atomic bombs dropped on Japan prevented what would most likely been horrific casualties on both sides, who can say that a small nuke device dropped on Mecca could not produce the same result?

I am not advocating anything. Just asking some questions.

[agere_contra]

Wouldn't need a small nuke really. A fuel-air bomb just to wipe out the big borg cube. That way we can savour the moment on camera.

Seriously: I get tired of real "lets just nuke'em" posters - who doesn't? But Tancredo was discussing retribution - nuclear weapons are our ultimate (mortal) sanction against the Ummah. We cannot rule out use of Nuclear weapons at the last extremity. Pitts doesn't think self-defence is moral: we do.

[arnoldpalmerfan]

The WFLA host, Mr. Campbell, asked asked Cong. Tancredo about a scenario in which Islamic terrorists exploded nuclear devices in six (6) seven (7) or eight (8) U.S. cities.