Nonsense from the Idiot Department

The Buffalo News ^ | 7/23/2005 | LEONARD PITTS

[D.P.Roberts]

Islam has one goal: the total submission of every living human to it. It is the Terminator of memes. It will NOT stop until it has achieved its goal- or it is totally destroyed. Your choice.

[axes_of_weezles]

That's right bayou. You and Pitts make perfect sense for dhimmis.

[E Rocc]

In other words, the same situation we have now, except worse. Much, much, much worse.

Great article until he hit this part. At least Tancredo flushed out some of our nuttier posters.

-Eric

[MissAmericanPie]

I think it's a fine idea.

[keithtoo]

Tancredo let slip what we've all been thinking, but, given his position, he should have used more discretion.

Leonard Pitts on the other hand, is just an affirmative action hire who doesn't realize that he was not hired for his brains. He was hired for how he looks in the group photographs.

[agere_contra]

Under the name Mona Charen, he once wrote a newspaper column advocating the expulsion of Muslims from America. Under the name Rush Limbaugh, he has a radio talk show on which he compared the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity prank. Under the name Ann Coulter, he calls for the racial profiling of travelers from the Middle East. And under the name Tom Tancredo, he is apparently a member of Congress.

And under all those names - he was right, and Leonard Pitts was wrong.

[wolfpat]

It seems to me that if we were to actually bomb Mecca and Medina, it would prove Islam is a false religion.

[Dr.Hilarious]

But the 9/11 attacks have unleashed yahooism on an unprecedented scale. Cliff is no longer confined to his bar stool. Under the name Mona Charen, he once wrote a newspaper column advocating the expulsion of Muslims from America. Under the name Rush Limbaugh, he has a radio talk show on which he compared the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib to a fraternity prank. Under the name Ann Coulter, he calls for the racial profiling of travelers from the Middle East. And under the name Tom Tancredo, he is apparently a member of Congress.

And under the name Dick Durbin he compared our soldiers to Nazis. Under the name Howard Dean he said he'd let UBL have his day in court while Tom DeLay and Karl Rove should go to jail without such consideration. Under the name Derrick Z. Jackson he's refered to "our despicable, cowardly killing of innocent Iraqi civilians." Under the name Molly Ivins he claimed and had to retract the "fact" that the US killed more Iraqis than Saddam. Under the name Hillary Clinton he held up a newspaper and insinuated the President of the US knew about 9-11 before it happened. Under the name David Corn he outed Valeri Plame and is the first to blame someone else for it. Under the name The New York Times, ABC and dozens of others he claimed there was nothing criminal done in the Valerie Plame story, and then demanded a member of the other political party should be fired for those same acts they said were not even worthy of further investigation. Under the name Dan Rather he invented lies about a sitting president during an election. Under the name Ron Reagan Junior (among others) he attacked Rove for criminal actions yet found nothing of interest when Sandy Berger confessed to destruction of classified materials.

I could go on, but you get the point. There sure are a lot of yahoos around, but you seem to have ignored a big ol' pile of 'em!

[tet68]

Mr. Pitts, your constant framing of issues in terms of
beer and alcoholic beverages indicates a serious problem.
This combined with your obvious leftist social bent and your
discrimitory remarks in regards to certain members of our society which show definite repressed hostility make you
a prime candidate for rehabilitation.

Please seek help soon, or hospitalization may be ordered
by this court.

[agere_contra]

It is the Terminator of memes

I like this phrase - its true. But of course Islam, like Communism, also kills for real. "Islam is defined by the wholesale murder of masses of innocent people" as some Freeper said earlier today.

[digger48]

Pitts is just an angry black man. I've never read anything by him that I could even remotely agree with.

Sounds like he's a little jealous of others success, too. They must be racist that they make about 500 times more money than him.

[upchuck]

So, how many terrorist nuclear devices must be detonated in the US before we decide to get serious about eliminating, once and for all, the Islamic terrorists?

Their blasts here will, for the most part, kill innocent people. Why should we be prevented from answering in turn?

Just as the atomic bombs dropped on Japan prevented what would most likely been horrific casualties on both sides, who can say that a small nuke device dropped on Mecca could not produce the same result?

I am not advocating anything. Just asking some questions.

[agere_contra]

Dr.Hilarious, you are on a roll! Well said.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Leonard Pitts - enough said. Automatic barf alert.

[Chgogal]

"Host Pat Campbell had asked how we should respond if U.S. cities are ever struck by terrorists using nuclear devices. "Well," said Tancredo, "what if you said something like, if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites."

Actually, you don't need to give any thought to the ramifications of such an action, because they should be self-evident to anyone smarter than the average hamster. We would become an international pariah. Muslims would hate us with renewed fervor, and Osama bin Laden would thank us for writing his recruitment material."

It's funny how responding in kind to FASCIST MUSLIM TERRORISTS (who declared war on the US in the 1998) makes the US the "international pariah. No one is condemning nuclear attacks by TERRORISTS. That seems to be expected behavior.

Well I personally think it is time for some real tough love aimed at the FASCIST TERRORISTS. Mr. LEONARD PITTS, go take a long walk off a short pier. Imagine the world with major US cities and US industrial complexes glowing in the dark, while the FASCIST MUSLIM TERRORIST and supporting governments, Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan congratulate themselves for a job well done.

Mr. Leonard Pitts, I would like to remind you that 60+ years ago other fascists know as Germany and Japan gave us the Blitz Krieg and Pearl Harbor. We the allies gave them back Dresden, Berlin, Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Try to that fit into your puny sized brain?

[TheCrusader]

I take the reason for Tancredo's constant thrashing on FR threads to be that he holds the unmitigated audacity to disagree with the President on the dangerously pourous southern border.

Frankly, I don't think bombing Mecca would be an unreasonable retaliation for a nuclear holocaust on our soil set off by Muslim terrorists. The only thing besides their bloody faith these folks hold as valuable is their oil, and I don't think we'd commit economic suicide by bombing their oil wells.

But then I suppose we could go and liberate another Muslim country in response to the nuked US cities, and tie up the rest of our military and remaining resources so that China could start an aggression against us while we're still dropping like flies from the radiation.

I wonder if people really understand that Tancredo was asked for a possible, (as in NOT A DEFINATE), response to a massive Islamic attack against multiple American cities using nuclear weapons, which would almost certainly mean that hundreds of thousands or millions of Americans would have been murdered in one fell swoop of the Islamic scimitar? What in blue blazes is everyone's problem with his response, is it fear?

[agere_contra]

Wouldn't need a small nuke really. A fuel-air bomb just to wipe out the big borg cube. That way we can savour the moment on camera.

Seriously: I get tired of real "lets just nuke'em" posters - who doesn't? But Tancredo was discussing retribution - nuclear weapons are our ultimate (mortal) sanction against the Ummah. We cannot rule out use of Nuclear weapons at the last extremity. Pitts doesn't think self-defence is moral: we do.

[mdittmar]

Me thinks you protest much;)

[dakine]

Follow the money...he/she/it has a financial interest....